Comparative analysis of horizontal and pipe drains in earth dams: optimizing seepage control and stability (case study)

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-12065-4
Hicham Charrak, Hosni Abderrahmane Taleb, Hamza Loualbia, Salah Eddine Bouguerba
{"title":"Comparative analysis of horizontal and pipe drains in earth dams: optimizing seepage control and stability (case study)","authors":"Hicham Charrak,&nbsp;Hosni Abderrahmane Taleb,&nbsp;Hamza Loualbia,&nbsp;Salah Eddine Bouguerba","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12065-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a comparative analysis of horizontal and pipe drains in earth dams, focusing on optimizing seepage control and stability. Using the Kreireche dam in Algeria as a case study, we employed GeoSlope software (SEEP/W and SLOPE/W) to conduct numerical simulations across 20 different scenarios, varying drain configurations and hydraulic conditions. Results indicate that pipe drains significantly outperform horizontal drains in managing seepage and enhancing dam stability. Pipe drains with larger diameters (2 m) reduced pore pressure by 15–20% compared to horizontal drains, demonstrating superior seepage control. Optimal drain placement within the range of X/B = 0.2 to 0.4 led to maximum safety factors, highlighting the importance of drain positioning. Statistical analysis using RMS, MAE, and MSE metrics showed that pipe drains consistently provided more reliable seepage and exit gradient control compared to horizontal drains. Increasing pipe drain diameter from 1 m to 2 m improved discharge seepage prediction consistency, reducing normalized RMS and MAE by 18.5% and 17.3%, respectively. Pipe drains exhibited 64.2% lower normalized RMS values for exit gradient predictions compared to horizontal drains, indicating more effective erosion risk mitigation. This study provides important insights for enhancing drainage system design in earth dams, resulting in increased stability and long-term performance of these crucial water management structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12065-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of horizontal and pipe drains in earth dams, focusing on optimizing seepage control and stability. Using the Kreireche dam in Algeria as a case study, we employed GeoSlope software (SEEP/W and SLOPE/W) to conduct numerical simulations across 20 different scenarios, varying drain configurations and hydraulic conditions. Results indicate that pipe drains significantly outperform horizontal drains in managing seepage and enhancing dam stability. Pipe drains with larger diameters (2 m) reduced pore pressure by 15–20% compared to horizontal drains, demonstrating superior seepage control. Optimal drain placement within the range of X/B = 0.2 to 0.4 led to maximum safety factors, highlighting the importance of drain positioning. Statistical analysis using RMS, MAE, and MSE metrics showed that pipe drains consistently provided more reliable seepage and exit gradient control compared to horizontal drains. Increasing pipe drain diameter from 1 m to 2 m improved discharge seepage prediction consistency, reducing normalized RMS and MAE by 18.5% and 17.3%, respectively. Pipe drains exhibited 64.2% lower normalized RMS values for exit gradient predictions compared to horizontal drains, indicating more effective erosion risk mitigation. This study provides important insights for enhancing drainage system design in earth dams, resulting in increased stability and long-term performance of these crucial water management structures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土坝水平排水与管道排水的对比分析:优化渗流控制与稳定性(案例研究)
本文对土坝水平排水管和管道排水管进行了对比分析,重点研究了土坝渗流控制和稳定性的优化问题。以阿尔及利亚的Kreireche大坝为例,我们使用GeoSlope软件(SEEP/W和SLOPE/W)进行了20种不同情况下的数值模拟,包括不同的排水配置和水力条件。结果表明,管道排水在控制渗流和提高大坝稳定性方面明显优于水平排水。与水平排水管相比,直径较大(2米)的管道排水管降低了15-20%的孔隙压力,显示出更好的防渗能力。X/B = 0.2 ~ 0.4范围内的最佳排水管位置安全系数最大,突出了排水管位置的重要性。使用RMS、MAE和MSE指标进行的统计分析表明,与水平排水管相比,管道排水管始终提供更可靠的渗流和出口梯度控制。将管道排水直径从1 m增加到2 m,提高了排水渗流预测的一致性,使归一化RMS和MAE分别降低了18.5%和17.3%。与水平排水管相比,管道出口梯度预测的标准化均方根值降低了64.2%,表明更有效地缓解了侵蚀风险。本研究为加强土坝排水系统设计提供了重要见解,从而提高了这些关键水管理结构的稳定性和长期性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Geochemistry and machine learning: methods and benchmarking Spatial analysis of flood susceptibility in Coastal area of Pakistan using machine learning models and SAR imagery Review of aquifer storage and recovery opportunities and challenges in India Determining prospective zones for groundwater recharge using remote sensing, GIS, and AHP modelling techniques: an investigation of the Mandi district in Himachal Pradesh, India Improving water infiltration in croplands mitigates the effects of extreme rainfall events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1