Hicham Charrak, Hosni Abderrahmane Taleb, Hamza Loualbia, Salah Eddine Bouguerba
{"title":"Comparative analysis of horizontal and pipe drains in earth dams: optimizing seepage control and stability (case study)","authors":"Hicham Charrak, Hosni Abderrahmane Taleb, Hamza Loualbia, Salah Eddine Bouguerba","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12065-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a comparative analysis of horizontal and pipe drains in earth dams, focusing on optimizing seepage control and stability. Using the Kreireche dam in Algeria as a case study, we employed GeoSlope software (SEEP/W and SLOPE/W) to conduct numerical simulations across 20 different scenarios, varying drain configurations and hydraulic conditions. Results indicate that pipe drains significantly outperform horizontal drains in managing seepage and enhancing dam stability. Pipe drains with larger diameters (2 m) reduced pore pressure by 15–20% compared to horizontal drains, demonstrating superior seepage control. Optimal drain placement within the range of X/B = 0.2 to 0.4 led to maximum safety factors, highlighting the importance of drain positioning. Statistical analysis using RMS, MAE, and MSE metrics showed that pipe drains consistently provided more reliable seepage and exit gradient control compared to horizontal drains. Increasing pipe drain diameter from 1 m to 2 m improved discharge seepage prediction consistency, reducing normalized RMS and MAE by 18.5% and 17.3%, respectively. Pipe drains exhibited 64.2% lower normalized RMS values for exit gradient predictions compared to horizontal drains, indicating more effective erosion risk mitigation. This study provides important insights for enhancing drainage system design in earth dams, resulting in increased stability and long-term performance of these crucial water management structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12065-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of horizontal and pipe drains in earth dams, focusing on optimizing seepage control and stability. Using the Kreireche dam in Algeria as a case study, we employed GeoSlope software (SEEP/W and SLOPE/W) to conduct numerical simulations across 20 different scenarios, varying drain configurations and hydraulic conditions. Results indicate that pipe drains significantly outperform horizontal drains in managing seepage and enhancing dam stability. Pipe drains with larger diameters (2 m) reduced pore pressure by 15–20% compared to horizontal drains, demonstrating superior seepage control. Optimal drain placement within the range of X/B = 0.2 to 0.4 led to maximum safety factors, highlighting the importance of drain positioning. Statistical analysis using RMS, MAE, and MSE metrics showed that pipe drains consistently provided more reliable seepage and exit gradient control compared to horizontal drains. Increasing pipe drain diameter from 1 m to 2 m improved discharge seepage prediction consistency, reducing normalized RMS and MAE by 18.5% and 17.3%, respectively. Pipe drains exhibited 64.2% lower normalized RMS values for exit gradient predictions compared to horizontal drains, indicating more effective erosion risk mitigation. This study provides important insights for enhancing drainage system design in earth dams, resulting in increased stability and long-term performance of these crucial water management structures.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.