N. I. Prasianakis, E. Laloy, D. Jacques, J. C. L. Meeussen, G. D. Miron, D. A. Kulik, A. Idiart, E. Demirer, E. Coene, B. Cochepin, M. Leconte, M. E. Savino, J. Samper-Pilar, M. De Lucia, S. V. Churakov, O. Kolditz, C. Yang, J. Samper, F. Claret
{"title":"Geochemistry and machine learning: methods and benchmarking","authors":"N. I. Prasianakis, E. Laloy, D. Jacques, J. C. L. Meeussen, G. D. Miron, D. A. Kulik, A. Idiart, E. Demirer, E. Coene, B. Cochepin, M. Leconte, M. E. Savino, J. Samper-Pilar, M. De Lucia, S. V. Churakov, O. Kolditz, C. Yang, J. Samper, F. Claret","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-12066-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Thanks to the recent progress in numerical methods and computer technology, the application fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning methods (ML) are growing at a very fast pace. The field of geochemistry for nuclear waste management has recently started using ML for the acceleration of numerical simulations of reactive transport processes, for the improvement of multiscale and multiphysics couplings efficiency, and for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis. Several case studies indicate that the use of ML based approaches brings an overall acceleration of geochemical and reactive transport simulations between one and four orders of magnitude. This paper presents a benchmarking exercise that aims at providing a set of reference data and models for developing and applying ML techniques for geochemical and reactive transport simulations. Several well-known geochemical speciation codes are used to generate systematically a consistent set of high-quality chemical equilibrium data, to be used as input for the training of several ML methods. Two benchmarks are formulated, each with multiple levels of gradually increasing degree of complexity. The first benchmark focuses on cement chemistry, while the second one considers uranium sorption on a clay mineral. The performance of different ML techniques is then evaluated in terms of their numerical efficiency and accuracy. A speedup of several orders of magnitude is observed. The benefits and the limitations of different ML based techniques are then analysed and highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12665-024-12066-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-12066-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thanks to the recent progress in numerical methods and computer technology, the application fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning methods (ML) are growing at a very fast pace. The field of geochemistry for nuclear waste management has recently started using ML for the acceleration of numerical simulations of reactive transport processes, for the improvement of multiscale and multiphysics couplings efficiency, and for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis. Several case studies indicate that the use of ML based approaches brings an overall acceleration of geochemical and reactive transport simulations between one and four orders of magnitude. This paper presents a benchmarking exercise that aims at providing a set of reference data and models for developing and applying ML techniques for geochemical and reactive transport simulations. Several well-known geochemical speciation codes are used to generate systematically a consistent set of high-quality chemical equilibrium data, to be used as input for the training of several ML methods. Two benchmarks are formulated, each with multiple levels of gradually increasing degree of complexity. The first benchmark focuses on cement chemistry, while the second one considers uranium sorption on a clay mineral. The performance of different ML techniques is then evaluated in terms of their numerical efficiency and accuracy. A speedup of several orders of magnitude is observed. The benefits and the limitations of different ML based techniques are then analysed and highlighted.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.