Vladimir V. Guryanov, Roman P. Mikhailov, Alexey V. Eliseev
{"title":"Present–day and future lightning frequency as simulated by four CMIP6 models","authors":"Vladimir V. Guryanov, Roman P. Mikhailov, Alexey V. Eliseev","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03587-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The lightning flash frequency (LFF, also referred to as lightning flash rate) in four models from the Coupled Models Intercomparison Project, phase 6 is examined. For the present day (PD, 1995–2014), the models exhibit very divergent simulation of LFF in terms of multi–annual averages, interannual variability, and temperature sensitivity. The global mean multi–annual average flash frequency differs by a factor of two between the models, and only two of four models are within the reasonable distance from the LIS/OTD (Lightning Imaging Sensor/Optical Transient Detector) satellite retrievals. The model–data and inter–model differences are even more pronounced at a regional scale and during northern summer. CMIP6 simulations show a general increase in lightning flash frequency from the present day to the late 21st century, especially for the simulations with higher anthropogenic <span>\\(\\textrm{CO}_2\\)</span> emissions into the atmosphere. LFF sensitivity coefficient <span>\\(\\beta\\)</span>, which is based on differences between PD and the late 21st century are positive over most continental areas with typical values from 10 to <span>\\(20 {\\% \\, \\textrm{K}^{-1}}\\)</span> for annual mean LFF and from 20 to <span>\\(60 {\\% \\, \\textrm{K}^{-1}}\\)</span> for JJA averages over the northern extra–tropical continents (and even up to <span>\\(100 {\\% \\, \\textrm{K}^{-1}}\\)</span> in some regions for individual models). At the global scale and for annual averages, this sensitivity is from 5 to <span>\\(17 {\\% \\, \\textrm{K}^{-1}}\\)</span>. In addition, this sensitivity is markedly different from its counterpart derived from the regression of LFF on surface air temperature for PD period. The latter counterpart is negative at the global scale and changes sign between different regions (i.e, it is positive over the North America south–east and is negative over the south–western part of North America and over the India Peninsula). These regional peculiarities are reasonably simulated by the models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"181 11","pages":"3351 - 3374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03587-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The lightning flash frequency (LFF, also referred to as lightning flash rate) in four models from the Coupled Models Intercomparison Project, phase 6 is examined. For the present day (PD, 1995–2014), the models exhibit very divergent simulation of LFF in terms of multi–annual averages, interannual variability, and temperature sensitivity. The global mean multi–annual average flash frequency differs by a factor of two between the models, and only two of four models are within the reasonable distance from the LIS/OTD (Lightning Imaging Sensor/Optical Transient Detector) satellite retrievals. The model–data and inter–model differences are even more pronounced at a regional scale and during northern summer. CMIP6 simulations show a general increase in lightning flash frequency from the present day to the late 21st century, especially for the simulations with higher anthropogenic \(\textrm{CO}_2\) emissions into the atmosphere. LFF sensitivity coefficient \(\beta\), which is based on differences between PD and the late 21st century are positive over most continental areas with typical values from 10 to \(20 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\) for annual mean LFF and from 20 to \(60 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\) for JJA averages over the northern extra–tropical continents (and even up to \(100 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\) in some regions for individual models). At the global scale and for annual averages, this sensitivity is from 5 to \(17 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\). In addition, this sensitivity is markedly different from its counterpart derived from the regression of LFF on surface air temperature for PD period. The latter counterpart is negative at the global scale and changes sign between different regions (i.e, it is positive over the North America south–east and is negative over the south–western part of North America and over the India Peninsula). These regional peculiarities are reasonably simulated by the models.
期刊介绍:
pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys.
Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata
Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences
Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research
Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences
See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.