Present–day and future lightning frequency as simulated by four CMIP6 models

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS pure and applied geophysics Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s00024-024-03587-w
Vladimir V. Guryanov, Roman P. Mikhailov, Alexey V. Eliseev
{"title":"Present–day and future lightning frequency as simulated by four CMIP6 models","authors":"Vladimir V. Guryanov,&nbsp;Roman P. Mikhailov,&nbsp;Alexey V. Eliseev","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03587-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The lightning flash frequency (LFF, also referred to as lightning flash rate) in four models from the Coupled Models Intercomparison Project, phase 6 is examined. For the present day (PD, 1995–2014), the models exhibit very divergent simulation of LFF in terms of multi–annual averages, interannual variability, and temperature sensitivity. The global mean multi–annual average flash frequency differs by a factor of two between the models, and only two of four models are within the reasonable distance from the LIS/OTD (Lightning Imaging Sensor/Optical Transient Detector) satellite retrievals. The model–data and inter–model differences are even more pronounced at a regional scale and during northern summer. CMIP6 simulations show a general increase in lightning flash frequency from the present day to the late 21st century, especially for the simulations with higher anthropogenic <span>\\(\\textrm{CO}_2\\)</span> emissions into the atmosphere. LFF sensitivity coefficient <span>\\(\\beta\\)</span>, which is based on differences between PD and the late 21st century are positive over most continental areas with typical values from 10 to <span>\\(20 {\\% \\, \\textrm{K}^{-1}}\\)</span> for annual mean LFF and from 20 to <span>\\(60 {\\% \\, \\textrm{K}^{-1}}\\)</span> for JJA averages over the northern extra–tropical continents (and even up to <span>\\(100 {\\% \\, \\textrm{K}^{-1}}\\)</span> in some regions for individual models). At the global scale and for annual averages, this sensitivity is from 5 to <span>\\(17 {\\% \\, \\textrm{K}^{-1}}\\)</span>. In addition, this sensitivity is markedly different from its counterpart derived from the regression of LFF on surface air temperature for PD period. The latter counterpart is negative at the global scale and changes sign between different regions (i.e, it is positive over the North America south–east and is negative over the south–western part of North America and over the India Peninsula). These regional peculiarities are reasonably simulated by the models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"181 11","pages":"3351 - 3374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03587-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lightning flash frequency (LFF, also referred to as lightning flash rate) in four models from the Coupled Models Intercomparison Project, phase 6 is examined. For the present day (PD, 1995–2014), the models exhibit very divergent simulation of LFF in terms of multi–annual averages, interannual variability, and temperature sensitivity. The global mean multi–annual average flash frequency differs by a factor of two between the models, and only two of four models are within the reasonable distance from the LIS/OTD (Lightning Imaging Sensor/Optical Transient Detector) satellite retrievals. The model–data and inter–model differences are even more pronounced at a regional scale and during northern summer. CMIP6 simulations show a general increase in lightning flash frequency from the present day to the late 21st century, especially for the simulations with higher anthropogenic \(\textrm{CO}_2\) emissions into the atmosphere. LFF sensitivity coefficient \(\beta\), which is based on differences between PD and the late 21st century are positive over most continental areas with typical values from 10 to \(20 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\) for annual mean LFF and from 20 to \(60 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\) for JJA averages over the northern extra–tropical continents (and even up to \(100 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\) in some regions for individual models). At the global scale and for annual averages, this sensitivity is from 5 to \(17 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\). In addition, this sensitivity is markedly different from its counterpart derived from the regression of LFF on surface air temperature for PD period. The latter counterpart is negative at the global scale and changes sign between different regions (i.e, it is positive over the North America south–east and is negative over the south–western part of North America and over the India Peninsula). These regional peculiarities are reasonably simulated by the models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由四个CMIP6模式模拟的现今及未来闪电频率
本文对耦合模式比对项目第6阶段的4个模式的闪电频率(LFF,也称为闪电速率)进行了研究。就目前而言(PD, 1995-2014),这些模式在多年平均值、年际变率和温度敏感性方面对LFF的模拟存在很大差异。全球平均多年平均闪光频率在不同模式之间相差两倍,并且四个模式中只有两个与LIS/OTD(闪电成像传感器/光学瞬变探测器)卫星检索的合理距离内。模式数据和模式间的差异在区域尺度和北部夏季更为明显。CMIP6模拟显示,从现在到21世纪后期,闪电频率普遍增加,特别是在大气中人为\(\textrm{CO}_2\)排放量较高的模拟中。LFF敏感性系数\(\beta\)(基于PD和21世纪后期的差异)在大多数大陆地区是正的,年平均LFF的典型值为10 ~ \(20 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\),北部热带外大陆的JJA平均LFF的典型值为20 ~ \(60 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\)(个别模式在某些地区甚至高达\(100 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\))。在全球尺度和年平均水平上,这种敏感性从5到\(17 {\% \, \textrm{K}^{-1}}\)。此外,该敏感性与PD期LFF对地表气温回归的敏感性有显著差异。后者在全球尺度上为负,并在不同地区之间变化(即,在北美东南部为正,在北美西南部和印度半岛为负)。这些区域特征被模型合理地模拟出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between TTI and Various Thunderstorm Related Parameters over Kerala, India Frequency-dependent Layered Q Model and Attenuation Tomography of the Himachal North-West Himalaya, India: Insight to Explore Crustal Variation Adaptive Window Approach for Curie Depth Calculation Based on Modified Centroid Method and the Application in the South China Block Modeling the Ventilation of the Vortex Periphery for Anticyclonic Quasi-Permanent Lofoten Vortex Stable Distribution of Fractional Fluctuations of Well Log Data in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1