Dillan Cunha Amaral , Jaime Guedes , Matheus Ribeiro Barbosa Cruz , Lídia Cheidde , Matheus Nepomuceno , Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães , Rodrigo Brazuna , Denisse J. Mora-Paez , Ping Huang , Reza Razeghinejad , Joel S. Schuman , Jonathan S. Myers
{"title":"GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Use and Incidence of Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Dillan Cunha Amaral , Jaime Guedes , Matheus Ribeiro Barbosa Cruz , Lídia Cheidde , Matheus Nepomuceno , Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães , Rodrigo Brazuna , Denisse J. Mora-Paez , Ping Huang , Reza Razeghinejad , Joel S. Schuman , Jonathan S. Myers","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2024.12.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In patients with diabetes, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) may protect against microvascular alterations and oxidative stress, both of which have been implicated in glaucoma. Multiple studies suggest a possible relation between GLP-1 RA use and the development of glaucoma. This study is a systematic review of the published literature regarding the incidence of glaucoma development in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 RAs compared with a control group.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from July 1991 to May 2024 for studies comparing the incidence of glaucoma development in GLP-1 RA users versus nonusers. We calculated the pooled hazard ratio for the GLP-1 RA group and control individuals using a random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred ninety-four studies were identified, of which 5 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 156,042 participants based on routinely collected electronic data. The meta-analysis revealed no significant statistical difference in glaucoma incidence among GLP-1 RA users compared with control individuals (hazard ratio 0.779 [95% CI 0.585-11.036]; <em>P</em> = .086; I<sup>2</sup> = 86%). During the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, the inclusion of the study by Shao and associates yielded opposite effects, suggesting that SGLT-2 inhibitors might be as effective as, or potentially more effective than, GLP-1 RAs in preventing glaucoma. When this study was excluded from the analysis, the results demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of glaucoma among GLP-1 RA users compared with control individuals, with reduced heterogeneity (hazard ratio 0.71 [95% CI 0.60-0.85], I² = 29%). Studies had moderate bias concerns because of confounding factors and intervention classification.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This systematic meta-analysis found that GLP-1 RA use is associated with reduced glaucoma development in retrospective studies. Future well-designed, long-term studies focusing on GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors are needed to validate these findings and evaluate their effects on glaucoma progression and vision loss. The overall interpretation should be cautious.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"271 ","pages":"Pages 488-497"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939424005890","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
In patients with diabetes, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) may protect against microvascular alterations and oxidative stress, both of which have been implicated in glaucoma. Multiple studies suggest a possible relation between GLP-1 RA use and the development of glaucoma. This study is a systematic review of the published literature regarding the incidence of glaucoma development in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 RAs compared with a control group.
Design
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from July 1991 to May 2024 for studies comparing the incidence of glaucoma development in GLP-1 RA users versus nonusers. We calculated the pooled hazard ratio for the GLP-1 RA group and control individuals using a random-effects model.
Results
One hundred ninety-four studies were identified, of which 5 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 156,042 participants based on routinely collected electronic data. The meta-analysis revealed no significant statistical difference in glaucoma incidence among GLP-1 RA users compared with control individuals (hazard ratio 0.779 [95% CI 0.585-11.036]; P = .086; I2 = 86%). During the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, the inclusion of the study by Shao and associates yielded opposite effects, suggesting that SGLT-2 inhibitors might be as effective as, or potentially more effective than, GLP-1 RAs in preventing glaucoma. When this study was excluded from the analysis, the results demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of glaucoma among GLP-1 RA users compared with control individuals, with reduced heterogeneity (hazard ratio 0.71 [95% CI 0.60-0.85], I² = 29%). Studies had moderate bias concerns because of confounding factors and intervention classification.
Conclusion
This systematic meta-analysis found that GLP-1 RA use is associated with reduced glaucoma development in retrospective studies. Future well-designed, long-term studies focusing on GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors are needed to validate these findings and evaluate their effects on glaucoma progression and vision loss. The overall interpretation should be cautious.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.