Magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection in preterm labor: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07891-7
Uzair Jafar, Ahmad Nawaz, Muhammad Zain Ahmad Zahid, Samavia Saddiqah, Fakiha Zainab, Shaharyar Naeem, M Uzair Siddique, Momina Butt, Andrea Etrusco, Mislav Mikuš, Antonio Simone Laganà
{"title":"Magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection in preterm labor: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Uzair Jafar, Ahmad Nawaz, Muhammad Zain Ahmad Zahid, Samavia Saddiqah, Fakiha Zainab, Shaharyar Naeem, M Uzair Siddique, Momina Butt, Andrea Etrusco, Mislav Mikuš, Antonio Simone Laganà","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07891-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antenatal magnesium sulfate has been reported to reduce the risk of neurological impairment in fetuses born to women at risk of preterm labor. However, the evidence to support its use is conflicting. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in women at risk of preterm labor as new research is available from RCTs giving insights into MgSO4 treatment among differing gestational age groups.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We searched various electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal from 1990 till 31st March 2024 to retrieve all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of magnesium sulfate in women at risk of preterm labor with or without intent of fetal neuroprotection We used the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) to assess the quality of the included randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct all statistical analyses using a random-effects model. Our Meta-analysis was registered with the PROSPERO International Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024532421).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our meta-analysis including eight RCTs showed that magnesium sulfate reduced the risk of cerebral palsy without a significant change in pediatric mortality. The change was evident in moderate to severe cerebral palsy. Magnesium sulfate showed no beneficial effect in most of the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis found antenatal magnesium sulfate reduces the risk of cerebral palsy with no difference in pediatric mortality between the magnesium or no magnesium treatment groups, which is a positive finding. However, there is still substantial heterogeneity between the studies, so there is a need for further exploration and discussion. The implications of this review include a concern for developing nations where resources and availability of magnesium sulfate are limited. Hence, further studies are needed to determine the exact dosage, timing, and whether maintenance dosage of magnesium sulfate is required or not and for how long.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07891-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Antenatal magnesium sulfate has been reported to reduce the risk of neurological impairment in fetuses born to women at risk of preterm labor. However, the evidence to support its use is conflicting. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of magnesium sulfate in women at risk of preterm labor as new research is available from RCTs giving insights into MgSO4 treatment among differing gestational age groups.

Study design: We searched various electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal from 1990 till 31st March 2024 to retrieve all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the use of magnesium sulfate in women at risk of preterm labor with or without intent of fetal neuroprotection We used the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) to assess the quality of the included randomized controlled trials. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct all statistical analyses using a random-effects model. Our Meta-analysis was registered with the PROSPERO International Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024532421).

Results: Our meta-analysis including eight RCTs showed that magnesium sulfate reduced the risk of cerebral palsy without a significant change in pediatric mortality. The change was evident in moderate to severe cerebral palsy. Magnesium sulfate showed no beneficial effect in most of the secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis found antenatal magnesium sulfate reduces the risk of cerebral palsy with no difference in pediatric mortality between the magnesium or no magnesium treatment groups, which is a positive finding. However, there is still substantial heterogeneity between the studies, so there is a need for further exploration and discussion. The implications of this review include a concern for developing nations where resources and availability of magnesium sulfate are limited. Hence, further studies are needed to determine the exact dosage, timing, and whether maintenance dosage of magnesium sulfate is required or not and for how long.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硫酸镁用于早产胎儿神经保护:随机对照试验的最新系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:据报道,产前硫酸镁可降低有早产风险妇女所生胎儿神经功能障碍的风险。然而,支持其使用的证据是相互矛盾的。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估硫酸镁对有早产风险的妇女的疗效和安全性,因为新的研究可以从随机对照试验中获得,从而深入了解不同胎龄人群的硫酸镁治疗。研究设计:我们搜索了各种电子数据库,包括MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov、和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台门户网站检索1990年至2024年3月31日期间调查硫酸镁在有或无胎儿神经保护目的的早产风险妇女中使用的所有随机对照试验(rct)。我们使用修订后的Cochrane风险偏倚工具(RoB 2.0)来评估纳入的随机对照试验的质量。采用RevMan 5.4软件,采用随机效应模型进行统计分析。我们的meta分析已在普洛斯彼罗国际系统评价登记册(CRD42024532421)注册。结果:我们的荟萃分析包括8项随机对照试验显示,硫酸镁降低了脑瘫的风险,但没有显著改变儿童死亡率。这种变化在中重度脑瘫中表现明显。硫酸镁在大多数次要结局中没有显示出有益作用。结论:本荟萃分析发现,产前硫酸镁可降低脑瘫的风险,在镁治疗组和无镁治疗组之间的儿童死亡率没有差异,这是一个积极的发现。但各研究之间仍存在较大的异质性,需要进一步探索和探讨。这篇综述的意义包括对发展中国家的关注,那里的硫酸镁资源和可用性有限。因此,需要进一步的研究来确定确切的剂量、时间、是否需要硫酸镁的维持剂量以及维持多长时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
The outcome of early perineal rehabilitation in obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a single-center experience. Comparison of complications and surgery outcomes in skin closure methods following cesarean sections. Impact of a new image enhancement technology on the nuchal translucency thickness. The effect of intrapartum deinfibulation on obstetric outcomes and postpartum sexual function in pregnant women with Type 3 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting. Unmet clinical needs in women with polycystic ovary syndrome regarding fertility and obesity: a cross-sectional study from the patient's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1