Romantic Relationships Matter More to Men than to Women.

IF 16.6 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X24001365
Iris V Wahring, Jeffry A Simpson, Paul A M Van Lange
{"title":"Romantic Relationships Matter More to Men than to Women.","authors":"Iris V Wahring, Jeffry A Simpson, Paul A M Van Lange","doi":"10.1017/S0140525X24001365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women are often viewed as more romantic than men, and romantic relationships are assumed to be more central to the lives of women than to those of men. Despite the prevalence of these beliefs, some recent research paints a different picture. Using principles and insights based on the interdisciplinary literature on mixed-gender relationships, we advance a set of four propositions relevant to differences between men and women and their romantic relationships. We propose that relative to women: (a) men expect to obtain greater benefits from relationship formation and thus strive more strongly for a romantic partner, (b) men benefit more from romantic relationship involvement in terms of their mental and physical health, (c) men are less likely to initiate breakups, and (d) men suffer more from relationship dissolution. We offer theoretical explanations based on differences between men and women in the availability of social networks that provide intimacy and emotional support. We discuss implications for friendships in general and friendships between men and women in particular.</p>","PeriodicalId":8698,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-64"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24001365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Women are often viewed as more romantic than men, and romantic relationships are assumed to be more central to the lives of women than to those of men. Despite the prevalence of these beliefs, some recent research paints a different picture. Using principles and insights based on the interdisciplinary literature on mixed-gender relationships, we advance a set of four propositions relevant to differences between men and women and their romantic relationships. We propose that relative to women: (a) men expect to obtain greater benefits from relationship formation and thus strive more strongly for a romantic partner, (b) men benefit more from romantic relationship involvement in terms of their mental and physical health, (c) men are less likely to initiate breakups, and (d) men suffer more from relationship dissolution. We offer theoretical explanations based on differences between men and women in the availability of social networks that provide intimacy and emotional support. We discuss implications for friendships in general and friendships between men and women in particular.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恋爱关系对男人比对女人更重要。
女性通常被认为比男性更浪漫,而浪漫关系被认为是女性生活中比男性更重要的部分。尽管这些观点普遍存在,但最近的一些研究描绘了一幅不同的画面。利用基于跨学科文献的原则和见解,我们提出了一套关于男女之间差异及其浪漫关系的四个命题。我们提出,相对于女性:(a)男性期望从关系的形成中获得更大的利益,因此更强烈地争取一个浪漫的伴侣;(b)男性从浪漫关系的参与中获得更多的精神和身体健康;(c)男性不太可能主动提出分手;(d)男性更容易受到关系破裂的影响。我们根据男性和女性在提供亲密关系和情感支持的社会网络可用性方面的差异提供理论解释。我们讨论了一般意义上的友谊,尤其是男女之间的友谊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
353
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.
期刊最新文献
Adopt process-oriented models (if they're more useful). Almost, but not quite there: Research into the emergence of higher-order motivated behavior should fully embrace the dynamic systems approach. Beyond reductionism: Understanding motivational energization requires higher-order constructs. Connecting theories of personality dynamics and mental computational processes. Definitional devils and detail: On identifying motivation as an animating dynamic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1