Secretory breast carcinoma: a multicenter clinicopathologic study of 80 cases with emphasis on prognostic analysis and chemotherapy benefit.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07583-5
Mengyang Qi, Shuang Gao, Zhe Zhang, Ronggang Lang, Zhidong Huang, Jinhui Wang, Xiaolong Qian, Kuisheng Chen, Hong Liu
{"title":"Secretory breast carcinoma: a multicenter clinicopathologic study of 80 cases with emphasis on prognostic analysis and chemotherapy benefit.","authors":"Mengyang Qi, Shuang Gao, Zhe Zhang, Ronggang Lang, Zhidong Huang, Jinhui Wang, Xiaolong Qian, Kuisheng Chen, Hong Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07583-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) and to determine chemotherapy benefits stratified by different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SBCs and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma patients (TN-IDCs) were enrolled from three cancer centers between January 2011 and December 2020. SBCs were further divided into two subgroups: those with triple negativity (TN-SBCs) and those without (non-TN-SBCs). Clinicopathologic characteristics were thoroughly compared among the three subgroups associated with triple negativity. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were performed for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 SBCs and 310 TN-IDCs were included in the study. The TN-SBC subgroup consisted of 35 individuals (43.75%) with mild clinical behaviors and a satisfying prognosis in comparison to non-TN-SBCs and TN-IDCs. In SBCs, N stage (N1 vs. N0: HR = 11.176, 95% CI 0.843-148.132, p = 0.067; N2-3 vs. N0: HR = 30.409, 95% CI 1.378-671.169, p = 0.031), LNR (HR = 23.894, 95% CI 1.614-353.835, p = 0.021), and histological grade (HR = 28.634, 95% CI 2.745-298.703, p = 0.005) were significantly correlated with disease-free survival (DFS). Patients in high LNR group receiving chemotherapy achieved a prolonged DFS (p = 0.025), while chemotherapy did not confer a survival benefit in TN-SBCs of our interest (p = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TN-SBC is a unique entity with low malignant potential. Advanced N stage, high LNR, and advanced histological grade are adverse determinants of DFS in SBC. Adjuvant chemotherapy provides superior DFS in high LNR SBCs rather than TN-SBCs, hence it is recommended for high LNR SBCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"451-461"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07583-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) and to determine chemotherapy benefits stratified by different subgroups.

Methods: SBCs and triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma patients (TN-IDCs) were enrolled from three cancer centers between January 2011 and December 2020. SBCs were further divided into two subgroups: those with triple negativity (TN-SBCs) and those without (non-TN-SBCs). Clinicopathologic characteristics were thoroughly compared among the three subgroups associated with triple negativity. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were performed for survival analysis.

Results: A total of 80 SBCs and 310 TN-IDCs were included in the study. The TN-SBC subgroup consisted of 35 individuals (43.75%) with mild clinical behaviors and a satisfying prognosis in comparison to non-TN-SBCs and TN-IDCs. In SBCs, N stage (N1 vs. N0: HR = 11.176, 95% CI 0.843-148.132, p = 0.067; N2-3 vs. N0: HR = 30.409, 95% CI 1.378-671.169, p = 0.031), LNR (HR = 23.894, 95% CI 1.614-353.835, p = 0.021), and histological grade (HR = 28.634, 95% CI 2.745-298.703, p = 0.005) were significantly correlated with disease-free survival (DFS). Patients in high LNR group receiving chemotherapy achieved a prolonged DFS (p = 0.025), while chemotherapy did not confer a survival benefit in TN-SBCs of our interest (p = 0.12).

Conclusion: TN-SBC is a unique entity with low malignant potential. Advanced N stage, high LNR, and advanced histological grade are adverse determinants of DFS in SBC. Adjuvant chemotherapy provides superior DFS in high LNR SBCs rather than TN-SBCs, hence it is recommended for high LNR SBCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分泌性乳腺癌:80例多中心临床病理研究,重点分析预后和化疗效果。
目的:探讨分泌性乳腺癌(SBC)的临床病理特点及预后,确定不同亚组的化疗效果。方法:2011年1月至2020年12月,从三个癌症中心招募sbc和三阴性浸润性导管癌患者(tn - idc)。sbc进一步分为两组:三阴性(tn - sbc)组和无(non- tn - sbc)组。比较三阴性亚组的临床病理特征。采用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险模型进行生存分析。结果:共纳入80例sbc和310例tn - idc。TN-SBC亚组35例(43.75%),与非TN-SBC和TN-IDCs相比,临床行为轻微,预后满意。在SBCs中,N期(N1 vs. N0: HR = 11.176, 95% CI 0.843-148.132, p = 0.067;N2-3 vs. N0: HR = 30.409, 95% CI 1.378 ~ 671.169, p = 0.031)、LNR (HR = 23.894, 95% CI 1.614 ~ 353.835, p = 0.021)、组织学分级(HR = 28.634, 95% CI 2.745 ~ 298.703, p = 0.005)与无病生存(DFS)显著相关。接受化疗的高LNR组患者获得了延长的DFS (p = 0.025),而化疗并未给我们感兴趣的tn - sbc患者带来生存益处(p = 0.12)。结论:TN-SBC是一种独特的低恶性潜能肿瘤。晚期N期、高LNR和高组织学分级是SBC患者DFS的不利决定因素。辅助化疗对高LNR sbc的DFS优于tn - sbc,因此推荐用于高LNR sbc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Preferences of patients with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer for adjuvant endocrine treatment: an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis study from Germany. Did the COVID-19 consortium recommendations impact the treatment of breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic? Unveiling the role of PANoptosis-related genes in breast cancer: an integrated study by multi-omics analysis and machine learning algorithms. Triaging mammography with artificial intelligence: an implementation study. Diet quality and cardiometabolic health in breast cancer survivors: the Pathways Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1