Limited Efficacy of Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Rare RAS Variants: Analysis of the C-CAT Database.

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Current Issues in Molecular Biology Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.3390/cimb46120869
Shuhei Suzuki, Yosuke Saito, Koki Saito, Yuta Yamada, Koshi Takahashi, Ryosuke Kumanishi, Tadahisa Fukui, Takashi Yoshioka
{"title":"Limited Efficacy of Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Rare RAS Variants: Analysis of the C-CAT Database.","authors":"Shuhei Suzuki, Yosuke Saito, Koki Saito, Yuta Yamada, Koshi Takahashi, Ryosuke Kumanishi, Tadahisa Fukui, Takashi Yoshioka","doi":"10.3390/cimb46120869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition is crucial in treating RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, yet current testing methods may miss rare RAS variants affecting treatment efficacy. We analyzed 4122 colorectal cancer patients receiving anti-EGFR antibodies from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database, identifying 54 patients (1.3%) with rare RAS variants undetectable by standard testing. These patients showed significantly lower response rates to anti-EGFR therapy (28.3%) compared to RAS wild-type cases (44.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Disease control rates were also lower in rare variant cases (60.9%) versus wild-type cases (80.0%). Most common rare variants included <i>KRAS</i> Q22K, A59E, and A11_G12insGA. Comprehensive genomic profiling revealed additional alterations in <i>TP53</i> (90.7%), <i>APC</i> (87.0%), and non-V600E <i>BRAF</i> mutations (25.9%). Our findings suggest that rare RAS variants predict poor anti-EGFR therapy response, highlighting the potential benefit of comprehensive genomic profiling before treatment initiation. This study provides real-world evidence supporting the clinical relevance of rare RAS variants in treatment decision-making for colorectal cancer. Future studies should focus on developing cost-effective comprehensive testing strategies and evaluating alternative treatment approaches for patients with rare RAS variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10839,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Molecular Biology","volume":"46 12","pages":"14476-14486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46120869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition is crucial in treating RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, yet current testing methods may miss rare RAS variants affecting treatment efficacy. We analyzed 4122 colorectal cancer patients receiving anti-EGFR antibodies from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database, identifying 54 patients (1.3%) with rare RAS variants undetectable by standard testing. These patients showed significantly lower response rates to anti-EGFR therapy (28.3%) compared to RAS wild-type cases (44.6%, p = 0.003). Disease control rates were also lower in rare variant cases (60.9%) versus wild-type cases (80.0%). Most common rare variants included KRAS Q22K, A59E, and A11_G12insGA. Comprehensive genomic profiling revealed additional alterations in TP53 (90.7%), APC (87.0%), and non-V600E BRAF mutations (25.9%). Our findings suggest that rare RAS variants predict poor anti-EGFR therapy response, highlighting the potential benefit of comprehensive genomic profiling before treatment initiation. This study provides real-world evidence supporting the clinical relevance of rare RAS variants in treatment decision-making for colorectal cancer. Future studies should focus on developing cost-effective comprehensive testing strategies and evaluating alternative treatment approaches for patients with rare RAS variants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗egfr单克隆抗体在结直肠癌罕见RAS变异患者中的有限疗效:C-CAT数据库分析
表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)抑制在治疗RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌中至关重要,但目前的检测方法可能会遗漏影响治疗效果的罕见RAS变异。我们分析了来自癌症基因组学和高级治疗中心数据库的4122名接受抗egfr抗体的结直肠癌患者,确定了54名患者(1.3%)具有标准检测无法检测到的罕见RAS变异。这些患者对抗egfr治疗的应答率(28.3%)明显低于RAS野生型患者(44.6%,p = 0.003)。罕见变异病例的疾病控制率(60.9%)也低于野生型病例(80.0%)。最常见的罕见变异包括KRAS Q22K, A59E和A11_G12insGA。综合基因组分析显示TP53(90.7%)、APC(87.0%)和非v600e BRAF突变(25.9%)发生了额外的改变。我们的研究结果表明,罕见的RAS变异预示着较差的抗egfr治疗反应,强调了在治疗开始前进行全面的基因组分析的潜在益处。本研究提供了真实世界的证据,支持罕见的RAS变异与结直肠癌治疗决策的临床相关性。未来的研究应侧重于开发具有成本效益的综合检测策略,并评估罕见RAS变异患者的替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
Current Issues in Molecular Biology 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
380
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Issues in Molecular Biology (CIMB) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing review articles and minireviews in all areas of molecular biology and microbiology. Submitted articles are subject to an Article Processing Charge (APC) and are open access immediately upon publication. All manuscripts undergo a peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Screening of Anti-Hair Loss Plant Raw Materials Based on Reverse Network Pharmacology and Experimental Validation. Targeting SLC4A4: A Novel Approach in Colorectal Cancer Drug Repurposing. A Case of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Mutually Exclusive EGFR and KRAS Mutations. Impact of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists on Pathophysiology of Pediatric Immune Thrombocytopenia. The First Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Secale strictum subsp. africanum Stapf (Poaceae), the Putative Ancestor of the Genus Secale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1