Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in advanced solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1475502
Jiahui Cao, Xinyao Ding, Jianan Ji, Lin Zhang, Chengyan Luo
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in advanced solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jiahui Cao, Xinyao Ding, Jianan Ji, Lin Zhang, Chengyan Luo","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1475502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficacy and safety of re-administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced solid tumors lacks consensus and is of great concern to clinicians. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of ICIs rechallenges in advanced solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and screened the relevant literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meanwhile, we conducted a meta-analysis of objective response rates (ORR), disease control rates (DCR), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) for reuse of ICIs using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis, and the results revealed that those who discontinued ICIs therapy and reused ICIs had an ORR of 21.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.6, 25.7] and a DCR of 55.8% (95% CI: 50.0, 61.5). The overall incidence for grade ≥ 3 irAEs was 16.7% (95% CI: 11.8, 22.2). In the subgroup analysis, patients with renal cell carcinoma presented superior efficacy with an ORR of 30.9%, which was higher than that of melanoma (24.3%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (10.1%). Patients who have been treated with single-agent ICIs, re-treatment with a combination of ICIs directing different targets presents better outcomes, with ORR of 22.5% and DCR of 38%, respectively, compared with those patients who continue to use a single agent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with advanced solid tumors who have relapsed or progressed after prior treatment with ICIs may benefit from ICIs rechallenge, with a comparable incidence of grade ≥ 3 irAEs to those previously treated with ICIs.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023407409.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"14 ","pages":"1475502"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1475502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of re-administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced solid tumors lacks consensus and is of great concern to clinicians. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of ICIs rechallenges in advanced solid tumors.

Methods: We systematically searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and screened the relevant literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meanwhile, we conducted a meta-analysis of objective response rates (ORR), disease control rates (DCR), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) for reuse of ICIs using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method.

Results: Sixty eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis, and the results revealed that those who discontinued ICIs therapy and reused ICIs had an ORR of 21.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.6, 25.7] and a DCR of 55.8% (95% CI: 50.0, 61.5). The overall incidence for grade ≥ 3 irAEs was 16.7% (95% CI: 11.8, 22.2). In the subgroup analysis, patients with renal cell carcinoma presented superior efficacy with an ORR of 30.9%, which was higher than that of melanoma (24.3%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (10.1%). Patients who have been treated with single-agent ICIs, re-treatment with a combination of ICIs directing different targets presents better outcomes, with ORR of 22.5% and DCR of 38%, respectively, compared with those patients who continue to use a single agent.

Conclusion: Patients with advanced solid tumors who have relapsed or progressed after prior treatment with ICIs may benefit from ICIs rechallenge, with a comparable incidence of grade ≥ 3 irAEs to those previously treated with ICIs.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023407409.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫检查点抑制剂在晚期实体瘤中的有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在晚期实体瘤中的疗效和安全性缺乏共识,是临床医生非常关注的问题。本研究旨在探讨ICIs再灌注治疗晚期实体瘤的疗效和不良反应。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和中国知网数据库,按照纳入和排除标准筛选相关文献。同时,我们采用Freeman-Tukey双反正弦变换方法对ICIs重复使用的客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)进行了meta分析。结果:meta分析纳入了60项符合条件的研究,结果显示,停止使用ICIs治疗并重新使用ICIs的患者ORR为21.6%[95%可信区间(CI): 17.6, 25.7], DCR为55.8% (95% CI: 50.0, 61.5)。≥3级irae的总发生率为16.7% (95% CI: 11.8, 22.2)。在亚组分析中,肾细胞癌患者的ORR为30.9%,优于黑色素瘤(24.3%)和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)(10.1%)。与继续使用单一药物的患者相比,接受单一药物ICIs治疗的患者,再接受针对不同靶点的联合ICIs治疗的结果更好,ORR分别为22.5%,DCR为38%。结论:在先前接受过ICIs治疗后复发或进展的晚期实体瘤患者可能从ICIs再挑战中获益,其≥3级irae的发生率与先前接受过ICIs治疗的患者相当。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42023407409。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making regarding hyperbaric oxygen-assisted cancer treatment among related healthcare professionals. Machine learning model for predicting malnutrition risk in lung cancer patients after thoracoscopic resection: a multi-center study. The efficacy and safety of radiotherapy and immunotherapy with or without anlotinib in driver gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Bisphosphonates in breast cancer radiotherapy: associations with skeletal complications and treatment outcomes - a retrospective cohort study. Deep learning radiomics models based on contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound for predicting distant metastasis in rectal cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1