Developing a codebook for assessing auditory hallucination complexity using mixed methods.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1441919
Igor J Pietkiewicz, Radosław Tomalski, Anna M Hełka
{"title":"Developing a codebook for assessing auditory hallucination complexity using mixed methods.","authors":"Igor J Pietkiewicz, Radosław Tomalski, Anna M Hełka","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1441919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years there has been a notable expansion of psychotherapeutic approaches to treat people experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH). While many psychotherapists conceptualize voices as \"dissociative parts\" and apply therapeutic techniques derived from the field of dissociation, research investigating AVH from this perspective is limited. Despite the acknowledgment that voices encountered in dissociative identity disorder (DID) often exhibit high complexity and autonomy, there is a critical need for assessment tools capable of exploring voice complexity across different clinical groups. Such tools hold significant potential for aiding clinicians to identify patients who may benefit more from dissociation-based therapy approaches. This study aims to operationalize the concept of voice complexity (VC) by identifying its different dimensions and indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using concept mapping procedures, 12 healthcare professionals and two voice-hearers participated in brainstorming, and 24 people with clinical backgrounds performed sorting and rating tasks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven dimensions of VC were identified: System Complexity, Content Complexity, Voice's Interest Complexity, Interaction Complexity with Voice-Hearer, Voice's Own Life, Voice Influence, and Voice's Vocal Characteristics. A codebook for assessing VC with indicators for varying levels of complexity across these dimensions was developed and can be used with the Structured Clinical Interview for Voice-Hearers. Inter-rater reliability, measured by comparing the assessments of two interview transcripts by seven raters using Kendall's Coefficient, indicated substantial agreement in one interview (W = .613) and almost perfect agreement in the second (W = .805).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The new instrument has promise as an effective tool for comparative studies exploring VC in diverse clinical and non-clinical populations, with potential implications for clinical practice and future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"15 ","pages":"1441919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1441919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years there has been a notable expansion of psychotherapeutic approaches to treat people experiencing auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH). While many psychotherapists conceptualize voices as "dissociative parts" and apply therapeutic techniques derived from the field of dissociation, research investigating AVH from this perspective is limited. Despite the acknowledgment that voices encountered in dissociative identity disorder (DID) often exhibit high complexity and autonomy, there is a critical need for assessment tools capable of exploring voice complexity across different clinical groups. Such tools hold significant potential for aiding clinicians to identify patients who may benefit more from dissociation-based therapy approaches. This study aims to operationalize the concept of voice complexity (VC) by identifying its different dimensions and indicators.

Methods: Using concept mapping procedures, 12 healthcare professionals and two voice-hearers participated in brainstorming, and 24 people with clinical backgrounds performed sorting and rating tasks.

Results: Seven dimensions of VC were identified: System Complexity, Content Complexity, Voice's Interest Complexity, Interaction Complexity with Voice-Hearer, Voice's Own Life, Voice Influence, and Voice's Vocal Characteristics. A codebook for assessing VC with indicators for varying levels of complexity across these dimensions was developed and can be used with the Structured Clinical Interview for Voice-Hearers. Inter-rater reliability, measured by comparing the assessments of two interview transcripts by seven raters using Kendall's Coefficient, indicated substantial agreement in one interview (W = .613) and almost perfect agreement in the second (W = .805).

Discussion: The new instrument has promise as an effective tool for comparative studies exploring VC in diverse clinical and non-clinical populations, with potential implications for clinical practice and future research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发使用混合方法评估幻听复杂性的密码本。
近年来,心理治疗方法在治疗听觉言语幻觉(AVH)方面有了显著的扩展。虽然许多心理治疗师将声音概念化为“分离部位”,并应用来自分离领域的治疗技术,但从这个角度调查AVH的研究是有限的。尽管认识到在分离性身份障碍(DID)中遇到的声音通常表现出高度的复杂性和自主性,但仍然迫切需要能够探索不同临床群体中声音复杂性的评估工具。这些工具在帮助临床医生识别可能从基于分离的治疗方法中获益更多的患者方面具有重要的潜力。本研究旨在通过识别语音复杂性的不同维度和指标来实现语音复杂性的概念。方法:采用概念图绘制方法,选取12名卫生保健专业人员和2名听话者进行头脑风暴,24名具有临床背景的人员进行分类和评分任务。结果:确定了VC的7个维度:系统复杂性、内容复杂性、语音兴趣复杂性、与语音听众的交互复杂性、语音自身生活、语音影响和语音特征。开发了一个用于评估VC的代码本,该代码本具有跨这些维度的不同复杂程度的指标,可与语音听众的结构化临床访谈一起使用。评估者间信度,通过比较七个评估者使用肯德尔系数对两个访谈记录的评估来衡量,表明在一次访谈中有实质性的一致(W = .613),在第二次访谈中几乎完全一致(W = .805)。讨论:新仪器有望作为一种有效的工具,在不同的临床和非临床人群中进行VC的比较研究,对临床实践和未来的研究具有潜在的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Promoting resilience and sexual and reproductive health among adolescent migrants: a comprehensive approach. Challenging Case Report: Reevaluating autism diagnosis in a 7-year-old girl. Brief intermittent intense exercise as interoceptive exposure for panic disorder: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Scoping review of precision child and youth mental health research: dwelling in possibility. Sex-informed estrogen receptor modulation in schizophrenia: a male-focused ERβ/GPER1 framework for cognitive and negative symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1