Compensating elastic faults in a torque-assisted knee exoskeleton: functional evaluation and user perception study.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1186/s12984-024-01531-6
Rodrigo J Velasco-Guillen, Adna Bliek, Josep M Font-Llagunes, Bram Vanderborght, Philipp Beckerle
{"title":"Compensating elastic faults in a torque-assisted knee exoskeleton: functional evaluation and user perception study.","authors":"Rodrigo J Velasco-Guillen, Adna Bliek, Josep M Font-Llagunes, Bram Vanderborght, Philipp Beckerle","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01531-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wearable robots are often powered by elastic actuators, which can mimic the intrinsic compliance observed in human joints, contributing to safe and seamless interaction. However, due to their increased complexity, when compared to direct drives, elastic actuators are susceptible to faults, which pose significant challenges, potentially compromising user experience and safety during interaction. In this article, we developed a fault-tolerant control strategy for torque assistance in a knee exoskeleton and investigated user experience during a walking task while emulating faults. We implemented and evaluated the torque control scheme, based on impedance control, for a mechanically adjustable compliance actuator with nonlinear torque-deflection characteristics. Conducted functional evaluation experiments showed that the control strategy is capable of providing support during gait based on a torque profile. A user study was conducted to evaluate the impact of fault severity and compensation on the perception of support, stiffness, comfort, and trust while walking with the exoskeleton. Results from the user study revealed significant differences in participants' responses when comparing support and stiffness levels without fault compensation. In contrast, no significant differences were found when faults were compensated, indicating that fault tolerance can be achieved in practice. Meanwhile, comfort and trust measurements do not seem to depend directly on torque support levels, pointing to other influencing factors that could be considered in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"21 1","pages":"230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01531-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wearable robots are often powered by elastic actuators, which can mimic the intrinsic compliance observed in human joints, contributing to safe and seamless interaction. However, due to their increased complexity, when compared to direct drives, elastic actuators are susceptible to faults, which pose significant challenges, potentially compromising user experience and safety during interaction. In this article, we developed a fault-tolerant control strategy for torque assistance in a knee exoskeleton and investigated user experience during a walking task while emulating faults. We implemented and evaluated the torque control scheme, based on impedance control, for a mechanically adjustable compliance actuator with nonlinear torque-deflection characteristics. Conducted functional evaluation experiments showed that the control strategy is capable of providing support during gait based on a torque profile. A user study was conducted to evaluate the impact of fault severity and compensation on the perception of support, stiffness, comfort, and trust while walking with the exoskeleton. Results from the user study revealed significant differences in participants' responses when comparing support and stiffness levels without fault compensation. In contrast, no significant differences were found when faults were compensated, indicating that fault tolerance can be achieved in practice. Meanwhile, comfort and trust measurements do not seem to depend directly on torque support levels, pointing to other influencing factors that could be considered in future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补偿弹性故障的扭矩辅助膝关节外骨骼:功能评估和用户感知研究。
可穿戴机器人通常由弹性致动器驱动,可以模仿人类关节的固有顺应性,有助于安全无缝的交互。然而,由于其复杂性的增加,与直接驱动相比,弹性执行器容易出现故障,这构成了重大挑战,可能会影响用户体验和交互过程中的安全性。在本文中,我们开发了一种容错控制策略,用于膝关节外骨骼的扭矩辅助,并在模拟故障的同时研究了行走任务中的用户体验。我们实现并评估了基于阻抗控制的力矩控制方案,用于具有非线性力矩-挠度特性的机械可调顺应致动器。功能评估实验表明,该控制策略能够在基于扭矩分布的步态中提供支持。进行了一项用户研究,以评估故障严重程度和补偿对外骨骼行走时支撑力、刚度、舒适度和信任度的影响。用户研究的结果显示,当比较没有故障补偿的支持和刚度水平时,参与者的反应有显著差异。相比之下,在对故障进行补偿时,没有发现明显的差异,这表明在实践中可以实现容错。同时,舒适性和信任度测量似乎并不直接依赖于扭矩支持水平,这表明在未来的研究中可以考虑其他影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Neural modifications of transtibial prosthesis (TTP) users: an event-related potentials study. EEG-fMRI neurofeedback versus motor imagery after stroke, a randomized controlled trial. Efficacy of high- versus moderate-intensity spatially distributed sequential stimulation in subjects with spinal cord injury: an isometric study. Customization of manual wheelchair components: a state-of-the-art review. Wearable fall risk assessment by discriminating recessive weak foot individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1