The association of reduced ejection fraction with the outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.039
Kirthi S Bellamkonda, Cheryl Zogg, Nihar Desai, David Strosberg, David H Stone, Raul J Guzman, Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar
{"title":"The association of reduced ejection fraction with the outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.","authors":"Kirthi S Bellamkonda, Cheryl Zogg, Nihar Desai, David Strosberg, David H Stone, Raul J Guzman, Cassius Iyad Ochoa Chaar","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is estimated that 20% of patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair suffer from cardiomyopathy. This study examines the impact of reduced ejection fraction (EF) on the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and compares the different types of cardiomyopathies causing reduction of EF. Our hypothesis is that reduction in EF is associated with higher mortality after EVAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the Vascular Quality Initiative database for EVAR from 2003 to 2020. Patients presenting with symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm or rupture were excluded. Patients were excluded if age, sex, mortality, and EF were not available. Patients were stratified into categories in two separate analyses. The first analysis examines differences between <30% EF, 30% to 50% EF, and EF >50%, and the second analysis examined differences between ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with reduced EF. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, and outcomes were compared. Statistical comparisons were performed using χ<sup>2</sup> analysis for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Multivariable comparison was performed to find characteristics impacting mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 26,037 patients included and 20,127 (77.3%) had a normal EF (>50%), 4885 (18.7%) patients had a moderately reduced EF of 30% to 50%, and only 1025 (3.9%) patients had a severely reduced EF (<30%). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between patients with very reduced (1.9%) and reduced EF (1.7%), but was significantly higher than patients with normal EF (0.8%) (P < .001). There was a nearly two-fold increase in 30-day mortality for ischemic cardiomyopathy (1.1% vs 2.0%; P = .024) compared with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, but there was no difference in long-term mortality between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elective EVAR in patients with reduced EF is associated with higher 30-day mortality compared with patients with a normal EF, but the overall mortality rate in the Vascular Quality Initiative falls within the acceptable range of Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Among patients with reduced EF, the type of cardiomyopathy seems to have a more important association with 30-day mortality than the severity of cardiomyopathy does.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is estimated that 20% of patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair suffer from cardiomyopathy. This study examines the impact of reduced ejection fraction (EF) on the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and compares the different types of cardiomyopathies causing reduction of EF. Our hypothesis is that reduction in EF is associated with higher mortality after EVAR.

Methods: We examined the Vascular Quality Initiative database for EVAR from 2003 to 2020. Patients presenting with symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm or rupture were excluded. Patients were excluded if age, sex, mortality, and EF were not available. Patients were stratified into categories in two separate analyses. The first analysis examines differences between <30% EF, 30% to 50% EF, and EF >50%, and the second analysis examined differences between ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with reduced EF. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, and outcomes were compared. Statistical comparisons were performed using χ2 analysis for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Multivariable comparison was performed to find characteristics impacting mortality.

Results: There were 26,037 patients included and 20,127 (77.3%) had a normal EF (>50%), 4885 (18.7%) patients had a moderately reduced EF of 30% to 50%, and only 1025 (3.9%) patients had a severely reduced EF (<30%). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between patients with very reduced (1.9%) and reduced EF (1.7%), but was significantly higher than patients with normal EF (0.8%) (P < .001). There was a nearly two-fold increase in 30-day mortality for ischemic cardiomyopathy (1.1% vs 2.0%; P = .024) compared with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, but there was no difference in long-term mortality between the two groups.

Conclusions: Elective EVAR in patients with reduced EF is associated with higher 30-day mortality compared with patients with a normal EF, but the overall mortality rate in the Vascular Quality Initiative falls within the acceptable range of Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Among patients with reduced EF, the type of cardiomyopathy seems to have a more important association with 30-day mortality than the severity of cardiomyopathy does.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射血分数降低与血管内腹主动脉瘤修复预后的关系。
目的:估计接受选择性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术的患者中有20%患有心肌病。本研究探讨了射血分数(EF)降低对血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)结果的影响,并比较了引起EF降低的不同类型心肌病。我们的假设是EF的减少与EVAR后较高的死亡率有关。方法:我们检查血管质量倡议(VQI)数据库2003-2020年的EVAR。排除出现症状性AAA或破裂的患者。如果年龄、性别、死亡率和EF无法获得,则排除患者。患者在两个单独的分析中被分为不同的类别。第一个分析检查了50% EF之间的差异,第二个分析检查了EF减少患者中缺血性心肌病(ICM)和非缺血性心肌病(NICM)之间的差异。比较患者的人口统计学、合并症、手术特征和结果。分类变量采用卡方分析,连续变量采用方差分析进行统计比较。进行多变量比较以发现影响死亡率的特征。结果:纳入的26,037例患者中,20,127例(77.3%)患者的EF值为正常(50%),4,885例(18.7%)患者的EF值为中度降低(30-50%),只有1,025例(3.9%)患者的EF值严重降低。结论:EF值降低患者的选择性EVAR与EF值正常患者的30天死亡率相关,但VQI的总死亡率在SVS指南的可接受范围内。在EF降低的患者中,心肌病类型与30天死亡率的关系似乎比心肌病的严重程度更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
The great gender dilemma in complex aortic repair: Why do women fare worse with FEVAR? Controversies in the management strategy for symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion. Endovascular strategies for the short distance between the lowest renal artery and aortic bifurcation. How do we afford the BEST care for females with chronic limb-threatening ischemia? How should failed infrarenal endovascular aortic repair with a short renal artery to bifurcation distance be managed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1