Efficacy of oral modafinil on accelerating consciousness recovery in adult patients with moderate to severe acute traumatic brain injury admitted to intensive care unit: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-03145-x
Z Zand, F Zand, N Asmarian, G Sabetian, M Masjedi, Z Beizavinejad, M Banifatemi, O Yousefi, R Taheri, A Niakan, H Khalili
{"title":"Efficacy of oral modafinil on accelerating consciousness recovery in adult patients with moderate to severe acute traumatic brain injury admitted to intensive care unit: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.","authors":"Z Zand, F Zand, N Asmarian, G Sabetian, M Masjedi, Z Beizavinejad, M Banifatemi, O Yousefi, R Taheri, A Niakan, H Khalili","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03145-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a leading cause of hospitalization and disability in young and middle-aged adults. This study aims to survey the efficacy of oral modafinil, a low-side-effect central nervous system stimulant, in the enhancement of consciousness recovery in moderate to severe TBI patients in the ICUs of a referral trauma center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All ICU patients meeting inclusion criteria between April 2021 and April 2023 were screened. Eligible patients had a motor Glasgow Coma Score(GCS) of 4 or 5 and did not receive continuous intravenous sedatives within 24 h before screening. They were randomly assigned to receive 200mg of enteral modafinil or placebo daily for 7 days. Motor GCS and total GCS scores, ICU/hospital stay duration, mechanical ventilation requirement, tracheal tube removal time, and tracheostomy needs were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the included 85 eligible patients, there was no significant difference between the modafinil and placebo groups in the median days between the intervention and the time of a 2-unit increase in total GCS (P = 0.25) or a 1-unit increase in motor GCS (P-value = 0.31). The group assignment also had no impact on the mean GCS (P-value = 0.533) and mean motor GCS (P-value = 0.167) over time. The only significant difference was in the proportion of patients with an increase in total GCS by 2 units, which was 54% for the modafinil vs. 32% for the placebo group (P-value = 0.04), and an increase in motor GCS by 1 unit, with 56% in the modafinil vs. 34% in the placebo group (P-value = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The administration of modafinil appears to be safe and beneficial for patients with severe TBI during their stay in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03145-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a leading cause of hospitalization and disability in young and middle-aged adults. This study aims to survey the efficacy of oral modafinil, a low-side-effect central nervous system stimulant, in the enhancement of consciousness recovery in moderate to severe TBI patients in the ICUs of a referral trauma center.

Materials and methods: All ICU patients meeting inclusion criteria between April 2021 and April 2023 were screened. Eligible patients had a motor Glasgow Coma Score(GCS) of 4 or 5 and did not receive continuous intravenous sedatives within 24 h before screening. They were randomly assigned to receive 200mg of enteral modafinil or placebo daily for 7 days. Motor GCS and total GCS scores, ICU/hospital stay duration, mechanical ventilation requirement, tracheal tube removal time, and tracheostomy needs were recorded.

Results: Among the included 85 eligible patients, there was no significant difference between the modafinil and placebo groups in the median days between the intervention and the time of a 2-unit increase in total GCS (P = 0.25) or a 1-unit increase in motor GCS (P-value = 0.31). The group assignment also had no impact on the mean GCS (P-value = 0.533) and mean motor GCS (P-value = 0.167) over time. The only significant difference was in the proportion of patients with an increase in total GCS by 2 units, which was 54% for the modafinil vs. 32% for the placebo group (P-value = 0.04), and an increase in motor GCS by 1 unit, with 56% in the modafinil vs. 34% in the placebo group (P-value = 0.04).

Conclusion: The administration of modafinil appears to be safe and beneficial for patients with severe TBI during their stay in the ICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服莫达非尼加速重症监护病房中重度急性颅脑损伤成年患者意识恢复的疗效:一项随机双盲临床试验
背景:外伤性脑损伤(TBI)是导致中青年住院和致残的主要原因。本研究旨在探讨口服低副作用中枢神经系统兴奋剂莫达非尼对转诊创伤中心icu中重度TBI患者意识恢复的促进作用。材料与方法:筛选2021年4月至2023年4月期间符合纳入标准的所有ICU患者。符合条件的患者运动格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为4或5,并且在筛选前24小时内未接受持续静脉注射镇静剂。他们被随机分配每天接受200毫克的莫达非尼或安慰剂,持续7天。记录运动GCS和总GCS评分、ICU/住院时间、机械通气需求、拔管时间和气管切开术需求。结果:在纳入的85例符合条件的患者中,莫达非尼组和安慰剂组在干预与总GCS增加2个单位(P = 0.25)或运动GCS增加1个单位(P值= 0.31)之间的中位天数无显著差异。随着时间的推移,分组分配对平均GCS (p值= 0.533)和平均运动GCS (p值= 0.167)也没有影响。唯一的显著差异是总GCS增加2个单位的患者比例,莫达非尼组为54%,安慰剂组为32% (p值= 0.04),运动GCS增加1个单位,莫达非尼组为56%,安慰剂组为34% (p值= 0.04)。结论:对重症脑外伤患者在ICU期间给予莫达非尼治疗是安全有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Anatomical and quantitative analysis of safe entry zones to the lower brainstem through the far-lateral approach. Fully endoscopic transvallecular transforaminal approach to the fourth ventricle epidermoids - cadaveric anatomy, surgical technique & case series. Single-layer spherical (SLS) vs single-layer (SL) Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device in the treatment of narrow-neck intracranial aneurysms: a propensity score-matched analysis. Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pilot study on the application of augmented reality navigation for sacral neuromodulation and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1