Development and Validation of the Self-Management Questionnaire for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Who Underwent Endovascular Revascularization.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2024-12-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S493159
Meihong Shi, Xi Yang, Pan Song, Huarong Xiong, Dan Wang, Xiaoyan Quan, Xinjun Liu, Xiuying Hu, Jia Zhou
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Self-Management Questionnaire for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Who Underwent Endovascular Revascularization.","authors":"Meihong Shi, Xi Yang, Pan Song, Huarong Xiong, Dan Wang, Xiaoyan Quan, Xinjun Liu, Xiuying Hu, Jia Zhou","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S493159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To develop and psychometrically validate the Self-management Questionnaire for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Patients Who Underwent Endovascular Revascularization (LESQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed the LESQ and validated it in a Chinese population. A three-round cross-sectional descriptive survey in six hospitals in China, involving samples of 271, 269, and 623 participants, respectively. The surveys were conducted between February 2021 to March 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final version of the LESQ, with 22 items, was divided into three domains using exploratory factor analysis: medical management, rehabilitation exercise management, and daily life management. The questionnaire had good internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach's α of 0.953 and good retest reliability, with the coefficients of 0.917, respectively. The content validity of the LESQ was 0.939. The three domains of the questionnaire were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The optimal cut-off points were 52 and 70, respectively, using latent profile analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The LESQ is a new self-report questionnaire for measuring self-management ability with good reliability and validity through validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":"15 ","pages":"301-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11669539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S493159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To develop and psychometrically validate the Self-management Questionnaire for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease Patients Who Underwent Endovascular Revascularization (LESQ).

Methods: We developed the LESQ and validated it in a Chinese population. A three-round cross-sectional descriptive survey in six hospitals in China, involving samples of 271, 269, and 623 participants, respectively. The surveys were conducted between February 2021 to March 2022.

Results: The final version of the LESQ, with 22 items, was divided into three domains using exploratory factor analysis: medical management, rehabilitation exercise management, and daily life management. The questionnaire had good internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach's α of 0.953 and good retest reliability, with the coefficients of 0.917, respectively. The content validity of the LESQ was 0.939. The three domains of the questionnaire were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The optimal cut-off points were 52 and 70, respectively, using latent profile analysis.

Discussion: The LESQ is a new self-report questionnaire for measuring self-management ability with good reliability and validity through validation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢动脉疾病行血管内重建术患者自我管理问卷的编制与验证。
前言:编制下肢动脉疾病行血管内重建术(LESQ)患者自我管理问卷,并进行心理计量学验证。方法:我们开发了LESQ并在中国人群中进行了验证。一项在中国六家医院进行的三轮横断面描述性调查,分别涉及271、269和623名参与者。该调查于2021年2月至2022年3月进行。结果:经探索性因子分析,LESQ终版共22项,分为医疗管理、康复运动管理和日常生活管理三个领域。问卷具有良好的内部一致性信度,Cronbach's α为0.953,重测信度较好,其系数分别为0.917。LESQ的内容效度为0.939。通过验证性因子分析对问卷的三个域进行确认。潜在剖面分析的最佳分界点分别为52和70。讨论:LESQ是一种新型的自我管理能力测评自述问卷,经验证具有良好的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Content Validity of the COVID-19 Symptoms Daily Diary. Is It Time Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Had a Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure? A Review. Utilities Associated with the Treatment of Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD): A Time Trade-off (TTO) Study in the UK and Canada. "Time to Be Young?" - A Qualitative Study Exploring the Impact of Attending a Course for Young Carers Who Have a Parent with Dementia. The Role of Medical Helicopter and Ground Medical Crews in Polytrauma Management: An Evaluative Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1