Pub Date : 2024-08-28eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S423380
Elaine Iuanow, Emily A Pickup, Bilal Malik, Julie Doehrmann, Fernando A Huyke, Rachel Ducker, John Klock
Purpose: Breast cancer screening remains a challenge in the United States. Many women do not get a mammogram because of pain associated with the exam, radiation exposure, false-positive results, and additional costs. Others who may benefit from annual screening do not qualify because of young age and radiation risk. We hypothesize that a novel volumetric transmitted breast ultrasound, Quantitative Transmission (QT) Scan may encourage more women to have annual breast cancer screening. Assessing results from patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may predict the value of newer, more desirable screening technologies.
Participants and methods: Pre- and post-menopausal women who qualified for breast cancer screening were enrolled in a prospective trial of Quantitative Transmission (QT Scan) vs traditional mammography via Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Clinical Trials.gov NCT03052166. These women completed questionnaires to assess their experiences with QT Scan and DBT. Associations between QT Scan or DBT and differences in PRO scores were examined.
Results: A total of 430 subjects completed the PRO instrument analyzed. A total of 36 questions were asked, 34 were paired for both QT and DBT and two were asked regarding exclusively the QT Scan. Physical discomfort, perceptions of safety and low efficacy, false-positive results and additional out-of-pocket expenses were concerns identified as highest risk for opting out of screening mammography (differences between 2.1 and 2.9 indicate significant differences between means and standard deviations using the Cohen's d statistic). Student's T-test shows a significance level of <10 -10. Statistically significant differences in PROs between QT Scan and DBT were observed by 14 of the 17 paired experience questions (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Significant differences in PROs were found between QT scan and DBT, indicating women have significantly more negative experiences with traditional mammography via DBT and are less inclined to undergo screening mammography. Identification of PRO differences could be used to help identify a more desirable breast cancer screening modality.
目的:在美国,乳腺癌筛查仍然是一项挑战。许多妇女因为检查带来的疼痛、辐射、假阳性结果和额外费用而不做乳房 X 光检查。还有一些可能从年度筛查中获益的妇女由于年龄小和辐射风险而不符合条件。我们假设,一种新型的容积透射式乳腺超声检查--定量透射(QT)扫描--可能会鼓励更多妇女进行年度乳腺癌筛查。评估患者报告结果(PROs)可预测更新、更理想的筛查技术的价值:符合乳腺癌筛查条件的绝经前和绝经后妇女参加了定量透射(QT 扫描)与通过数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)进行的传统乳腺 X 线照相术的前瞻性试验,临床试验.gov NCT03052166。这些妇女填写了调查问卷,以评估她们对 QT 扫描和 DBT 的体验。结果:共有 430 名受试者完成了 PRO 工具的分析。共提出了 36 个问题,其中 34 个问题同时针对 QT 和 DBT,两个问题仅针对 QT 扫描。身体不适、对安全性和低效性的看法、假阳性结果和额外的自付费用被认为是选择不接受乳腺 X 线照相筛查的最大风险(2.1 和 2.9 之间的差异表示平均值和标准差之间存在显著差异,使用 Cohen's d 统计量)。学生 T 检验显示显著性水平为-10。在 17 个配对体验问题中,有 14 个问题观察到 QT 扫描和 DBT 在 PROs 方面存在统计学意义上的重大差异(p 结论:QT扫描和DBT之间的PROs存在显著差异,表明妇女对传统乳腺X光检查和DBT的负面体验明显更多,更不愿意接受乳腺X光筛查。识别PRO差异有助于确定更理想的乳腺癌筛查方式。
{"title":"Ultra-Low Frequency Transmitted Ultrasound Breast Imaging vs DBT (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis): A Patient-Reported Outcome Study.","authors":"Elaine Iuanow, Emily A Pickup, Bilal Malik, Julie Doehrmann, Fernando A Huyke, Rachel Ducker, John Klock","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S423380","DOIUrl":"10.2147/PROM.S423380","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Breast cancer screening remains a challenge in the United States. Many women do not get a mammogram because of pain associated with the exam, radiation exposure, false-positive results, and additional costs. Others who may benefit from annual screening do not qualify because of young age and radiation risk. We hypothesize that a novel volumetric transmitted breast ultrasound, Quantitative Transmission (QT) Scan may encourage more women to have annual breast cancer screening. Assessing results from patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may predict the value of newer, more desirable screening technologies.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Pre- and post-menopausal women who qualified for breast cancer screening were enrolled in a prospective trial of Quantitative Transmission (QT Scan) vs traditional mammography via Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Clinical Trials.gov NCT03052166. These women completed questionnaires to assess their experiences with QT Scan and DBT. Associations between QT Scan or DBT and differences in PRO scores were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 430 subjects completed the PRO instrument analyzed. A total of 36 questions were asked, 34 were paired for both QT and DBT and two were asked regarding exclusively the QT Scan. Physical discomfort, perceptions of safety and low efficacy, false-positive results and additional out-of-pocket expenses were concerns identified as highest risk for opting out of screening mammography (differences between 2.1 and 2.9 indicate significant differences between means and standard deviations using the Cohen's d statistic). Student's <i>T</i>-test shows a significance level of <10 <sup>-10</sup>. Statistically significant differences in PROs between QT Scan and DBT were observed by 14 of the 17 paired experience questions (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences in PROs were found between QT scan and DBT, indicating women have significantly more negative experiences with traditional mammography via DBT and are less inclined to undergo screening mammography. Identification of PRO differences could be used to help identify a more desirable breast cancer screening modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366257/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142110580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-17eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.2147/PROM.S454845
Dusica Hadzi Boskovic, Jayne Smith-Palmer, Johannes Pöhlmann, Richard F Pollock, Steve Hwang, David Bruhn
Aim: Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS) have been linked with poor functional outcomes. A literature review was performed to identify instruments used to assess functional outcomes and quality of life in clinical trials and observational studies conducted in groups of people with NSS.
Methods: Literature search strings were designed using Medical Subject Headings combined with free-text terms and searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. For inclusion, articles were required to be published as full-text articles, in English, over the period 2011-2021, include at least one group or treatment arm of people with NSS and report either functional outcomes or quality of life (QoL).
Results: Literature searches identified a total of 3,268 unique hits. After two rounds of screening, 37 publications (covering 35 individual studies) were included in the review. A total of fourteen different instruments were used to assess functional outcomes and eleven different instruments were used to assess QoL. In studies in people with NSS, the most frequently used functional outcome measures were the Personal and Social Performance scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning. The most frequently used QoL instruments included the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life, the Heinrich Carpenter Quality of Life Scale, the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale and the EQ-5D.
Conclusion: A large number of measures have been used to assess functional outcomes and QoL in people with NSS, these include both generic and condition-specific as well as both interviewer-administered and self-reported instruments.
{"title":"Systematic Literature Review of Studies Reporting Measures of Functional Outcome or Quality of Life in People with Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia.","authors":"Dusica Hadzi Boskovic, Jayne Smith-Palmer, Johannes Pöhlmann, Richard F Pollock, Steve Hwang, David Bruhn","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S454845","DOIUrl":"10.2147/PROM.S454845","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS) have been linked with poor functional outcomes. A literature review was performed to identify instruments used to assess functional outcomes and quality of life in clinical trials and observational studies conducted in groups of people with NSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search strings were designed using Medical Subject Headings combined with free-text terms and searches were performed using the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases. For inclusion, articles were required to be published as full-text articles, in English, over the period 2011-2021, include at least one group or treatment arm of people with NSS and report either functional outcomes or quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Literature searches identified a total of 3,268 unique hits. After two rounds of screening, 37 publications (covering 35 individual studies) were included in the review. A total of fourteen different instruments were used to assess functional outcomes and eleven different instruments were used to assess QoL. In studies in people with NSS, the most frequently used functional outcome measures were the Personal and Social Performance scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning. The most frequently used QoL instruments included the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life, the Heinrich Carpenter Quality of Life Scale, the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale and the EQ-5D.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large number of measures have been used to assess functional outcomes and QoL in people with NSS, these include both generic and condition-specific as well as both interviewer-administered and self-reported instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141444105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Quality of life (QoL) is impaired in patients with acne vulgaris. The Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) that assesses QoL of acne patients was initially developed in English and is being currently used widely after being validated in different languages. This study was conducted to validate the CADI in Sinhala, a language used by the majority of Sri Lanka.
Materials and methods: The CADI was translated into Sinhala, and lingually validated as per published guidelines. This CADI-Sinhala version and the Sinhala version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were simultaneously administered to 150 Sinhala-speaking young adults with acne. The clinical severity of acne was assessed using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS). The Cronbach's alpha and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine the internal consistency, reliability, and validity of the CADI-Sinhala. Construct validity was examined using a factor analysis.
Results: The study included 90% females and their mean age was 23 (SD, 2.5) years. The majority (97.3%) had acne of mild to moderate severity when measured by the GAGS. The CADI-Sinhala Scale showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.819 indicating high internal consistency and reliability. The mean item-total correlation coefficient was 0.74 (range, 0.42-0.87) with CADI Q3 having the lowest correlation. CADI Sinhala showed a strong and highly significant correlation with the Sinhala DLQI (Spearman's rho = 0.66; P< 0.001) indicating concurrent validity. The correlation with GAGS was of low intensity, although it was statistically significant (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: The CADI-Sinhala is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the QoL of Sinhala-speaking acne patients. This five-item tool will help clinicians to provide holistic treatment through improved understanding of patient's perspectives.
{"title":"Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Sinhala Translation of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI).","authors":"Achala Liyanage, Shamini Prathapan, Chathurika Jayarathne, Ludhmila Savani Ranaweera, Jennifer Perera","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S451537","DOIUrl":"10.2147/PROM.S451537","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) is impaired in patients with acne vulgaris. The Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) that assesses QoL of acne patients was initially developed in English and is being currently used widely after being validated in different languages. This study was conducted to validate the CADI in Sinhala, a language used by the majority of Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The CADI was translated into Sinhala, and lingually validated as per published guidelines. This CADI-Sinhala version and the Sinhala version of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were simultaneously administered to 150 Sinhala-speaking young adults with acne. The clinical severity of acne was assessed using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS). The Cronbach's alpha and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine the internal consistency, reliability, and validity of the CADI-Sinhala. Construct validity was examined using a factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 90% females and their mean age was 23 (SD, 2.5) years. The majority (97.3%) had acne of mild to moderate severity when measured by the GAGS. The CADI-Sinhala Scale showed a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.819 indicating high internal consistency and reliability. The mean item-total correlation coefficient was 0.74 (range, 0.42-0.87) with CADI Q3 having the lowest correlation. CADI Sinhala showed a strong and highly significant correlation with the Sinhala DLQI (Spearman's rho = 0.66; P< 0.001) indicating concurrent validity. The correlation with GAGS was of low intensity, although it was statistically significant (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CADI-Sinhala is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the QoL of Sinhala-speaking acne patients. This five-item tool will help clinicians to provide holistic treatment through improved understanding of patient's perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11088832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140912639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Natalia Warren, Steven L Maskin, V. Gurupur, Deidre Rector, Diana Adelman, Susan Howell, John McAree, Ruthie Dibble, Celia Carlisano, David Maconi, Dirk Schrotenboer, Maria Jaimes, Nancy Marte, Theresa Carlisano, Claire Toland, Jongik Chung, Sandra Cremers, Glenn Corbin
Introduction Although affecting an estimated 35% of the population, Dry Eye is not well understood by patients and the medical community. As a result, both in research and clinical settings, diagnostic and treatment protocols tend to be non-specific, ad hoc, and inadequate, with a narrow industry-driven focus. The purpose of this convening was to propose a research roadmap that orients Dry Eye researchers toward a comprehensive patient-centered approach to diagnosing and treating Dry Eye, Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and related comorbidities with a goal of improving clinical outcomes for Dry Eye/MGD patients. Methods Sixteen participants, including Dry Eye/MGD patients, caregivers, and patient advocates together with a group of experts in Dry Eye, MGD and other fields identified gaps in research on Dry Eye and MGD diagnostic and treatment approaches (age range 20–80; male to female ratio of 7:11; patients: 7). During a 2-day virtual convening, participants were assigned to topic-specific focus-group sessions to discuss and develop research questions pertaining to Dry Eye and MGD. The research questions were compiled into a proposed patient-centered roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD research. Two additional participants contributed to the proposed roadmap following the convening. Results The focus groups identified over 80 patient-centered research questions important to patients and other stakeholders and compiled these into a proposed research roadmap. Conclusion The convened stakeholders aim to establish a cohesive and comprehensive patient-centered approach to treating Dry Eye, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, and comorbidities. The research roadmap will serve as a reference for researchers, educational institutions, clinicians, and others evaluating diagnostic and treatment protocols in Dry Eye and MGD.
{"title":"Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD PCORI-Funded Research","authors":"Natalia Warren, Steven L Maskin, V. Gurupur, Deidre Rector, Diana Adelman, Susan Howell, John McAree, Ruthie Dibble, Celia Carlisano, David Maconi, Dirk Schrotenboer, Maria Jaimes, Nancy Marte, Theresa Carlisano, Claire Toland, Jongik Chung, Sandra Cremers, Glenn Corbin","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S438290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S438290","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Although affecting an estimated 35% of the population, Dry Eye is not well understood by patients and the medical community. As a result, both in research and clinical settings, diagnostic and treatment protocols tend to be non-specific, ad hoc, and inadequate, with a narrow industry-driven focus. The purpose of this convening was to propose a research roadmap that orients Dry Eye researchers toward a comprehensive patient-centered approach to diagnosing and treating Dry Eye, Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and related comorbidities with a goal of improving clinical outcomes for Dry Eye/MGD patients. Methods Sixteen participants, including Dry Eye/MGD patients, caregivers, and patient advocates together with a group of experts in Dry Eye, MGD and other fields identified gaps in research on Dry Eye and MGD diagnostic and treatment approaches (age range 20–80; male to female ratio of 7:11; patients: 7). During a 2-day virtual convening, participants were assigned to topic-specific focus-group sessions to discuss and develop research questions pertaining to Dry Eye and MGD. The research questions were compiled into a proposed patient-centered roadmap for Dry Eye and MGD research. Two additional participants contributed to the proposed roadmap following the convening. Results The focus groups identified over 80 patient-centered research questions important to patients and other stakeholders and compiled these into a proposed research roadmap. Conclusion The convened stakeholders aim to establish a cohesive and comprehensive patient-centered approach to treating Dry Eye, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, and comorbidities. The research roadmap will serve as a reference for researchers, educational institutions, clinicians, and others evaluating diagnostic and treatment protocols in Dry Eye and MGD.","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141026253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) is a validated score that assesses functional outcomes after lower limb arthroplasty, with fewer ceiling effects than other scores. The aim is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the HAAS into a Chinese version (HAAS-C) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of HAAS-C in patients after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods: A total of 104 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis who had undergone TKA at least 12 months prior were recruited. A forward and backward translation procedure was performed for developing a culturally acceptable HAAS-C. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) within a 10-day interval. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlations between HAAS-C and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQoL Group's five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and Oxford knee score (OKS).
Results: HAAS-C demonstrated adequate Internal consistency reliability, as indicated by Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.75. Test-retest reliability yielded excellent results, with an ICC value of 0.98. Content validity indices were high, with a scale-level validity index of 0.9 and item-level validity indices greater than or equal to 0.8. HAAS-C showed a strong correlation with WOMAC (r = 0.69), a moderate correlation with EQ-5D-5L (r = 0.43), and OKS (r = 0.53) while exhibiting no floor or ceiling effects.
Conclusion: The validated HAAS-C questionnaire is a valid instrument for assessing patients undergoing TKA in mainland China.
{"title":"Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the High Activity Arthroplasty Score.","authors":"Dongping Wan, Shihang Cao, Xinrui Li, Qiang Zan, Shuxin Yao, Jianbing Ma, Lei Shang, Chao Xu","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S451710","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S451710","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The High Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS) is a validated score that assesses functional outcomes after lower limb arthroplasty, with fewer ceiling effects than other scores. The aim is to translate and cross-culturally adapt the HAAS into a Chinese version (HAAS-C) and to evaluate the psychometric properties of HAAS-C in patients after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 104 patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis who had undergone TKA at least 12 months prior were recruited. A forward and backward translation procedure was performed for developing a culturally acceptable HAAS-C. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) within a 10-day interval. Construct validity was assessed by examining the correlations between HAAS-C and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQoL Group's five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and Oxford knee score (OKS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HAAS-C demonstrated adequate Internal consistency reliability, as indicated by Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.75. Test-retest reliability yielded excellent results, with an ICC value of 0.98. Content validity indices were high, with a scale-level validity index of 0.9 and item-level validity indices greater than or equal to 0.8. HAAS-C showed a strong correlation with WOMAC (<i>r</i> = 0.69), a moderate correlation with EQ-5D-5L (<i>r</i> = 0.43), and OKS (<i>r</i> = 0.53) while exhibiting no floor or ceiling effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The validated HAAS-C questionnaire is a valid instrument for assessing patients undergoing TKA in mainland China.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11069113/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140857404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Healthcare provided in medical facilities should prioritize the needs of families, as it enhances the quality of care for the patients. Family satisfaction gauges how effectively healthcare professionals address the perceived needs and expectations of family members. Numerous factors, including information dissemination, communication, family dynamics, patient characteristics, hospital facilities, and the caregiving process, serve as predictors of family satisfaction. Thus, this study seeks to evaluate the satisfaction of families with the care received by patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study involving 400 participants was conducted across multiple centers from March to June 2023. Multicollinearity was assessed by examining variance inflation factors (VIF), while the goodness-of-fit was evaluated using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify factors correlated with family satisfaction. Variables with a p-value below 0.2 in the bivariable logistic regression were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Adjusted Odds Ratios (AORs) with 95% Confidence Intervals were computed to indicate the strength of association. In the multivariable analysis, variables with a p-value less than 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. Results: The overall family satisfaction with the care provided in the intensive care unit was 58.6%, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 55.882% to 61.241%. Families expressed higher satisfaction levels with patient care (64.8%) and professional care (67.4%). However, they reported lower satisfaction levels regarding care provided for families (52.2%), the ICU environment (56.8%), and involvement of families in decision-making (55.8%). Lack of formal education (AOR: 1.949, 95% CI: 1.005, 4.169), completion of primary education (AOR: 2.581, 95% CI: 1.327, 5.021), and completion of grades 9–12 (AOR: 2.644, 95% CI: 1.411, 4.952) were found to be significantly associated with overall family satisfaction. Conclusion and recommendation: The overall level of satisfaction is satisfactory. To enhance service quality and family satisfaction, healthcare providers should prioritize effective and regular communication with family members. Keeping them well informed about the patient’s condition and treatment plan is essential.
{"title":"Family Satisfaction with Care Provided in Intensive Care Unit; a Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"T. Liyew, A. Mersha, B. Admassie, N. Arefayne","doi":"10.2147/prom.s453246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/prom.s453246","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Healthcare provided in medical facilities should prioritize the needs of families, as it enhances the quality of care for the patients. Family satisfaction gauges how effectively healthcare professionals address the perceived needs and expectations of family members. Numerous factors, including information dissemination, communication, family dynamics, patient characteristics, hospital facilities, and the caregiving process, serve as predictors of family satisfaction. Thus, this study seeks to evaluate the satisfaction of families with the care received by patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study involving 400 participants was conducted across multiple centers from March to June 2023. Multicollinearity was assessed by examining variance inflation factors (VIF), while the goodness-of-fit was evaluated using the Hosmer and Lemeshow test. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized to identify factors correlated with family satisfaction. Variables with a p-value below 0.2 in the bivariable logistic regression were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Adjusted Odds Ratios (AORs) with 95% Confidence Intervals were computed to indicate the strength of association. In the multivariable analysis, variables with a p-value less than 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. Results: The overall family satisfaction with the care provided in the intensive care unit was 58.6%, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 55.882% to 61.241%. Families expressed higher satisfaction levels with patient care (64.8%) and professional care (67.4%). However, they reported lower satisfaction levels regarding care provided for families (52.2%), the ICU environment (56.8%), and involvement of families in decision-making (55.8%). Lack of formal education (AOR: 1.949, 95% CI: 1.005, 4.169), completion of primary education (AOR: 2.581, 95% CI: 1.327, 5.021), and completion of grades 9–12 (AOR: 2.644, 95% CI: 1.411, 4.952) were found to be significantly associated with overall family satisfaction. Conclusion and recommendation: The overall level of satisfaction is satisfactory. To enhance service quality and family satisfaction, healthcare providers should prioritize effective and regular communication with family members. Keeping them well informed about the patient’s condition and treatment plan is essential.","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140791939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: A time-motion study is a scientific method for recording time spent on various tasks in a narrow range of specialized work settings, beginning with initial enrollment in ART provision. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the time motion of patient satisfaction with antiretroviral therapy services in Central Ethiopia.
Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 422 patients from June 14 to July 30, 2021. We used a simple random sampling technique to select the participants. Structural input-related qualitative data were collected using an in-depth interview and used for concurrent triangulation with quantitative. Quantitative data were collected using a standardized and pre-tested questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify independent predictors of time motion and patient satisfaction. The degree of association between the outcome and independent variables was assessed by using an odds ratio with a 95% CI.
Results: The time motion of patient satisfaction study found that 53.1% (224/422) of the study participants were satisfied. As independent predictors, time spent (time motion) waiting to be seen by a health professional (AOR = 0.228, 95% CI = 0.079-0.661), patient-provider interaction (AOR = 3.72, 95% CI = 2.111-5.771), perceived privacy (AOR = 2.912, 95% CI = 1.76-2.78), sex (AOR = 2.499, 95% CI = 1.556-4.009), and income class (AOR = 0.228, 95% CI = 0.073-0.707) were associated with outcome variable.
Conclusion: The study found low patient satisfaction with ART services, indicating the need for further improvement to enhance patient-centered services with the given time motion. Therefore, further research is needed to assess the intensity and reach of the information through an analysis of pre- and post-intervention that provides a complete picture of conceptualizations of time motion studies.
背景:时间运动研究是一种科学方法,用于记录从最初加入抗逆转录病毒疗法服务开始的一系列专业工作环境中各种任务所花费的时间。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚中部地区患者对抗逆转录病毒疗法服务满意度的时间运动:方法:我们在 2021 年 6 月 14 日至 7 月 30 日期间对 422 名患者样本进行了基于设施的横断面研究。我们采用简单随机抽样技术选取参与者。通过深入访谈收集了与结构输入相关的定性数据,并与定量数据进行了同步三角测量。定量数据采用标准化的预试问卷收集,并使用 SPSS 24.0 版进行分析。采用双变量和多变量逻辑回归来确定时间运动和患者满意度的独立预测因素。结果与自变量之间的关联程度通过赔率和 95% CI 进行评估:患者满意度的时间运动研究发现,53.1%(224/422)的研究参与者表示满意。771)、隐私感(AOR = 2.912,95% CI = 1.76-2.78)、性别(AOR = 2.499,95% CI = 1.556-4.009)和收入等级(AOR = 0.228,95% CI = 0.073-0.707)与结果变量相关:研究发现,患者对抗病毒疗法服务的满意度较低,这表明需要进一步改进,在给定的时间内加强以患者为中心的服务。因此,需要进一步开展研究,通过对干预前后的分析来评估信息的强度和覆盖范围,从而全面了解时间运动研究的概念。
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction with Antiretroviral Therapy Services in Hadiya Zone, Central Ethiopia Using the Donebidean Model: A Time-Motion Study.","authors":"Abayneh Halili, Belay Echafo Lubago, Feleke Doyore Agide","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S452389","DOIUrl":"10.2147/PROM.S452389","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A time-motion study is a scientific method for recording time spent on various tasks in a narrow range of specialized work settings, beginning with initial enrollment in ART provision. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the time motion of patient satisfaction with antiretroviral therapy services in Central Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 422 patients from June 14 to July 30, 2021. We used a simple random sampling technique to select the participants. Structural input-related qualitative data were collected using an in-depth interview and used for concurrent triangulation with quantitative. Quantitative data were collected using a standardized and pre-tested questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 24.0. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to identify independent predictors of time motion and patient satisfaction. The degree of association between the outcome and independent variables was assessed by using an odds ratio with a 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time motion of patient satisfaction study found that 53.1% (224/422) of the study participants were satisfied. As independent predictors, time spent (time motion) waiting to be seen by a health professional (AOR = 0.228, 95% CI = 0.079-0.661), patient-provider interaction (AOR = 3.72, 95% CI = 2.111-5.771), perceived privacy (AOR = 2.912, 95% CI = 1.76-2.78), sex (AOR = 2.499, 95% CI = 1.556-4.009), and income class (AOR = 0.228, 95% CI = 0.073-0.707) were associated with outcome variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found low patient satisfaction with ART services, indicating the need for further improvement to enhance patient-centered services with the given time motion. Therefore, further research is needed to assess the intensity and reach of the information through an analysis of pre- and post-intervention that provides a complete picture of conceptualizations of time motion studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10929262/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140111050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hugo Bothorel, Anthony Pernoud, P. Christofilopoulos
{"title":"Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation into French of the Harris Hip Score and the Modified Harris Hip Score","authors":"Hugo Bothorel, Anthony Pernoud, P. Christofilopoulos","doi":"10.2147/prom.s439707","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/prom.s439707","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140084245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The provision of intensive care services is advancing globally. However, in resource-limited settings, it is lagging far behind and intensive care unit mortality is still higher due to various reasons. This study aimed to assess determinants of mortality among medical patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
Methods: A five-year facility-based retrospective Cohort Study was conducted. A total of 546 medical patients admitted to the intensive care unit from March 2017 to February 2022 were included. Document review using a structured questionnaire was implemented to collect data. Data entered into Epi Data were analyzed by STATA and summarized using frequency tables and graphs. Binary and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify determinants of mortality.
Results: The overall mortality was 35.9%. Approximately half of the deaths were attributed to septic shock, congestive heart failure, severe community-acquired pneumonia, and stroke. The most common immediate cause of death was cardio-respiratory arrest. Source of admission, GCS level at admission, duration of ICU stay, treatment with inotropes, septic shock, and retroviral infection status were found to have a statistically significant association with ICU mortality.
Conclusion and recommendations: This study revealed a significantly higher mortality rate among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Early identification and admission of patients to the intensive care unit are important factors that could decrease mortality. Patient selection is essential since some patients with a high likelihood of mortality might not benefit from intensive care unit admission in an area with high resource limitations.
背景:在全球范围内,重症监护服务正在不断发展。然而,在资源有限的环境中,重症监护室的服务却远远落后,而且由于各种原因,重症监护室的死亡率仍然较高。本研究旨在评估入住重症监护室的内科病人死亡率的决定因素:方法:开展了一项为期五年的基于设施的回顾性队列研究。共纳入 2017 年 3 月至 2022 年 2 月期间入住重症监护室的 546 名内科患者。使用结构化问卷进行文件审查以收集数据。输入 Epi Data 的数据由 STATA 进行分析,并使用频率表和图表进行总结。进行二元和多元逻辑回归分析,以确定死亡率的决定因素:总死亡率为 35.9%。大约一半的死亡原因是脓毒性休克、充血性心力衰竭、严重社区获得性肺炎和中风。最常见的直接死因是心肺骤停。研究发现,入院来源、入院时的 GCS 水平、重症监护室住院时间、肌注治疗、脓毒性休克和逆转录病毒感染状况与重症监护室死亡率有显著的统计学关联:本研究显示,重症监护室住院患者的死亡率明显较高。及早发现患者并将其送入重症监护室是降低死亡率的重要因素。患者的选择至关重要,因为在资源高度紧张的地区,一些死亡率较高的患者可能无法从入住重症监护室中获益。
{"title":"Determinants of Mortality of Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit at Debre Berhan Comprehensive Specialized Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ermiyas Endewunet Melaku, Besufekad Mulugeta Urgie, Firmayie Dessie, Ali Seid, Zenebe Abebe, Aklile Semu Tefera","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S450502","DOIUrl":"10.2147/PROM.S450502","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The provision of intensive care services is advancing globally. However, in resource-limited settings, it is lagging far behind and intensive care unit mortality is still higher due to various reasons. This study aimed to assess determinants of mortality among medical patients admitted to the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A five-year facility-based retrospective Cohort Study was conducted. A total of 546 medical patients admitted to the intensive care unit from March 2017 to February 2022 were included. Document review using a structured questionnaire was implemented to collect data. Data entered into Epi Data were analyzed by STATA and summarized using frequency tables and graphs. Binary and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify determinants of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mortality was 35.9%. Approximately half of the deaths were attributed to septic shock, congestive heart failure, severe community-acquired pneumonia, and stroke. The most common immediate cause of death was cardio-respiratory arrest. Source of admission, GCS level at admission, duration of ICU stay, treatment with inotropes, septic shock, and retroviral infection status were found to have a statistically significant association with ICU mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendations: </strong>This study revealed a significantly higher mortality rate among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Early identification and admission of patients to the intensive care unit are important factors that could decrease mortality. Patient selection is essential since some patients with a high likelihood of mortality might not benefit from intensive care unit admission in an area with high resource limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139973013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}