Florian Manneville, Barthélemy Sarda, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Sandrine Péneau, Bernard Srour, Julia Baudry, Benjamin Allès, Yann Le Bodo, Serge Hercberg, Mathilde Touvier, Chantal Julia
{"title":"Acceptability patterns of hypothetic taxes on different types of foods in France.","authors":"Florian Manneville, Barthélemy Sarda, Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot, Sandrine Péneau, Bernard Srour, Julia Baudry, Benjamin Allès, Yann Le Bodo, Serge Hercberg, Mathilde Touvier, Chantal Julia","doi":"10.1017/S1368980024002556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify patterns of food taxes acceptability among French adults and to investigate population characteristics associated with them.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional data from the NutriNet-Santé e-cohort. Participants completed an <i>ad hoc</i> web-based questionnaire to test patterns of hypothetical food taxes acceptability (i.e. overall perception combined with reasons for supporting or not) on eight food types: fatty foods, salty foods, sugary foods, fatty and salty foods, fatty and sugary products, meat products, foods/beverages with unfavourable front-of-pack nutrition label and 'ultra-processed foods'. Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics and dietary intakes (24-h records) were self-reported. Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns of food taxes acceptability.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults (<i>n</i> 27 900) engaged in the French NutriNet-Santé e-cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of participants in favour of taxes ranged from 11·5 % for fatty products to 78·0 % for ultra-processed foods. Identified patterns were (1) 'Support all food taxes' (16·9 %), (2) 'Support all but meat and fatty products taxes' (28·9 %), (3) 'Against all but UPF, Nutri-Score and salty products taxes' (26·5 %), (4) 'Against all food taxes' (8·6 %) and (5) 'No opinion' (19·1 %). Pattern 4 had higher proportions of participants with low socio-economic status, BMI above 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and who had consumption of foods targeted by the tax above the median.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results provide strategic information for policymakers responsible for designing food taxes and may help identify determinants of support for or opposition to food taxes in relation to individual or social characteristics or products taxed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980024002556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To identify patterns of food taxes acceptability among French adults and to investigate population characteristics associated with them.
Design: Cross-sectional data from the NutriNet-Santé e-cohort. Participants completed an ad hoc web-based questionnaire to test patterns of hypothetical food taxes acceptability (i.e. overall perception combined with reasons for supporting or not) on eight food types: fatty foods, salty foods, sugary foods, fatty and salty foods, fatty and sugary products, meat products, foods/beverages with unfavourable front-of-pack nutrition label and 'ultra-processed foods'. Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics and dietary intakes (24-h records) were self-reported. Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns of food taxes acceptability.
Setting: NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort study.
Participants: Adults (n 27 900) engaged in the French NutriNet-Santé e-cohort.
Results: The percentage of participants in favour of taxes ranged from 11·5 % for fatty products to 78·0 % for ultra-processed foods. Identified patterns were (1) 'Support all food taxes' (16·9 %), (2) 'Support all but meat and fatty products taxes' (28·9 %), (3) 'Against all but UPF, Nutri-Score and salty products taxes' (26·5 %), (4) 'Against all food taxes' (8·6 %) and (5) 'No opinion' (19·1 %). Pattern 4 had higher proportions of participants with low socio-economic status, BMI above 30 kg/m2 and who had consumption of foods targeted by the tax above the median.
Conclusions: Results provide strategic information for policymakers responsible for designing food taxes and may help identify determinants of support for or opposition to food taxes in relation to individual or social characteristics or products taxed.
期刊介绍：
Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
