[Legacy Effects of Long-term Straw Returning on Straw Degradation and Microbial Communities of the Aftercrop].

Q2 Environmental Science 环境科学 Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202312205
Si-Hao Zhou, Mei-Qi Wang, Yao Song, Hong-Jin Niu, Jing-Wei Zhao, Rui-Nan Hou, Xiao-Bo Chen, Ya-Li Huang
{"title":"[Legacy Effects of Long-term Straw Returning on Straw Degradation and Microbial Communities of the Aftercrop].","authors":"Si-Hao Zhou, Mei-Qi Wang, Yao Song, Hong-Jin Niu, Jing-Wei Zhao, Rui-Nan Hou, Xiao-Bo Chen, Ya-Li Huang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202312205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Straw incorporation can improve soil fertility and soil structure. While numerous studies have explored the immediate impacts of straw return on soil properties and crop production, the legacy effects of long-term straw return remain less understood. In this study, the straw returning soil of a continuous 15 years (SS) and non-straw returning soil (NS) were collected from Dahe Experimental Station of Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences in China. The simulation experiments of subsequent straw return were carried out in pots by adding straw to the two types of soil (SS and NS), in which the degradation rate of straw was determined using the sandbag method, the number of culturable microorganisms was counted through a dilution coating plate, and microbial communities were characterized using high-throughput sequencing. The findings revealed that compared with that in NS, SS significantly increased the degradation rate of 15 d and 30 d straw by 14.16% and 26.57%; the number of soil culturable fungi in 0-60 days by 43.10%-185.92%; and the number of cellulose-degrading bacteria by 55.12%-92.04% at 0 d, 42 d, and 56 d. Additionally, after straw returning for seven days, the bacterial ACE index, fungal ACE index, and Chao1 index in SS were lower than those in NS, indicating that the microbial community richness in SS was significantly reduced. At the phylum level of bacteria, the relative abundances of Acidobacteria, Rokubacteria, and Planctomycetes in SS increased observably, with an increase of 25.92%-45.17%. The relative abundances of the phyla of fungi such as Olpidiomycota, Zoopagomycota, and Glomeromycota increased markedly, with an increase of 12.09%-176.00%. At the genus level of bacteria, the relative abundances of uncultured_bacterium_c_<i>Subgroup_6</i> and uncultured_bacterium_o_<i>Rokubacteriales</i> in SS increased significantly, with an increase of 28.91%-31.26%, and at the genus level of fungi, the relative abundances of <i>Paecilomyces</i>, <i>Penicillium,</i> and <i>Moesziomyces</i> were significantly increased by 2.98%-8.79%. Network analysis showed the SS bacterial network had a higher interaction degree and network connection, and the fungal network structure was more complex and stable than that of the NS. RDA results showed that soil microbial community composition was significantly correlated with straw degradation rate. SS showed obvious legacy effects on straw degradation, the number of soil culturable microorganisms, and population structure in a certain period, and the microbial flora of SS was more conducive to the degradation of the straws.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 1","pages":"532-542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202312205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Straw incorporation can improve soil fertility and soil structure. While numerous studies have explored the immediate impacts of straw return on soil properties and crop production, the legacy effects of long-term straw return remain less understood. In this study, the straw returning soil of a continuous 15 years (SS) and non-straw returning soil (NS) were collected from Dahe Experimental Station of Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences in China. The simulation experiments of subsequent straw return were carried out in pots by adding straw to the two types of soil (SS and NS), in which the degradation rate of straw was determined using the sandbag method, the number of culturable microorganisms was counted through a dilution coating plate, and microbial communities were characterized using high-throughput sequencing. The findings revealed that compared with that in NS, SS significantly increased the degradation rate of 15 d and 30 d straw by 14.16% and 26.57%; the number of soil culturable fungi in 0-60 days by 43.10%-185.92%; and the number of cellulose-degrading bacteria by 55.12%-92.04% at 0 d, 42 d, and 56 d. Additionally, after straw returning for seven days, the bacterial ACE index, fungal ACE index, and Chao1 index in SS were lower than those in NS, indicating that the microbial community richness in SS was significantly reduced. At the phylum level of bacteria, the relative abundances of Acidobacteria, Rokubacteria, and Planctomycetes in SS increased observably, with an increase of 25.92%-45.17%. The relative abundances of the phyla of fungi such as Olpidiomycota, Zoopagomycota, and Glomeromycota increased markedly, with an increase of 12.09%-176.00%. At the genus level of bacteria, the relative abundances of uncultured_bacterium_c_Subgroup_6 and uncultured_bacterium_o_Rokubacteriales in SS increased significantly, with an increase of 28.91%-31.26%, and at the genus level of fungi, the relative abundances of Paecilomyces, Penicillium, and Moesziomyces were significantly increased by 2.98%-8.79%. Network analysis showed the SS bacterial network had a higher interaction degree and network connection, and the fungal network structure was more complex and stable than that of the NS. RDA results showed that soil microbial community composition was significantly correlated with straw degradation rate. SS showed obvious legacy effects on straw degradation, the number of soil culturable microorganisms, and population structure in a certain period, and the microbial flora of SS was more conducive to the degradation of the straws.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秸秆长期还田对秸秆降解和后茬微生物群落的影响[j]。
秸秆还田可以改善土壤肥力和土壤结构。虽然许多研究已经探讨了秸秆还田对土壤性质和作物生产的直接影响,但长期秸秆还田的遗留效应仍然知之甚少。本研究采集了河北省农林科学院大河试验站连续15年秸秆还田土壤(SS)和非秸秆还田土壤(NS)。采用盆栽法,在SS和NS两种土壤中添加秸秆,进行后续秸秆还田模拟实验,采用沙袋法测定秸秆降解速率,通过稀释涂布板计数可培养微生物数量,采用高通量测序对微生物群落进行表征。研究结果显示,相比之下,在NS,党卫军显著增加15 d和30 d秸秆的降解率14.16%和26.57%;土壤可培养真菌的数量0-60天43.10% -185.92%;cellulose-degrading细菌数量的55.12% -92.04%,0 d, 42 d, 56 d。此外,稻草七天回来后,细菌ACE指数,真菌ACE指数和SS Chao1指数低于NS,表明SS微生物群落丰富度显著降低。在菌门水平上,SS中酸性菌、Rokubacteria和plantomycetes的相对丰度显著增加,增幅为25.92% ~ 45.17%。Olpidiomycota、Zoopagomycota、Glomeromycota等真菌门类的相对丰度显著增加,增幅为12.09% ~ 176.00%。细菌属水平上,SS中未培养菌群(uncultured_bacterium_c_Subgroup_6)和未培养菌群(uncultured_bacterium_o_Rokubacteriales)的相对丰度显著增加,增幅为28.91% ~ 31.26%;真菌属水平上,拟青霉(Paecilomyces)、青霉(Penicillium)和Moesziomyces的相对丰度显著增加2.98% ~ 8.79%。网络分析表明,SS细菌网络具有更高的相互作用程度和网络连通性,真菌网络结构比NS更复杂和稳定。RDA结果表明,土壤微生物群落组成与秸秆降解率呈显著相关。在一定时期内,SS对秸秆降解、土壤可培养微生物数量和种群结构具有明显的遗留效应,且SS的微生物区系更有利于秸秆的降解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Key Problems and Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Reduction in China's Wastewater Treatment Industry]. [Legacy Effects of Long-term Straw Returning on Straw Degradation and Microbial Communities of the Aftercrop]. [Mechanisms of Rhizosphere Microorganisms in Regulating Plant Root System Architecture in Acidic Soils]. [Meta-analysis of the Occurrence Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Microplastics in Agricultural Soil in China]. [Meta-analysis on the Effects of Organic Fertilizer Application on Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Soils].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1