Should endoscopic submucosal dissection be offered to patients with early colorectal cancer?

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2024.109030
Attila Ulkucu, Metincan Erkaya, Kamil Erozkan, Brogan Catalano, David Liska, Daniela Allende, Scott R Steele, Joshua Sommovilla, Emre Gorgun
{"title":"Should endoscopic submucosal dissection be offered to patients with early colorectal cancer?","authors":"Attila Ulkucu, Metincan Erkaya, Kamil Erozkan, Brogan Catalano, David Liska, Daniela Allende, Scott R Steele, Joshua Sommovilla, Emre Gorgun","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.109030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection is increasingly used to treat early-stage colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection in this setting and the determinants of lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed patients who underwent colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for early-stage colorectal cancer at a tertiary center between 2011 and 2023. The primary outcome was the identification of high-risk pathologic features predictive of lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing oncologic colon resection following endoscopic submucosal dissection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 1,398 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, and 83 (6%) had colorectal cancer. Twenty-four patients (29%) were closely monitored after endoscopic submucosal dissection, and 59 (71%) underwent oncologic colon resection because of high-risk pathologies of the endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen. In the oncologic colon resection group, the mean age was 62.7 years (±10.2), with 56% male predominance, and 14% showed positive lymph nodes in the final pathology. Analysis comparing patients with and without lymph node metastasis showed significant differences in sex, lesion size, submucosal invasion depth, and budding scores. Multivariate analysis showed that lesions with a submucosal invasion depth ≥2.00 mm of the endoscopic submucosal dissection resection specimen had higher odds of lymph node metastasis (odds ratio 18.7, P = .028), whereas lesions with a diameter >20 mm were associated with a lower likelihood of lymph node metastasis (odds ratio 0.07, P = .036).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the oncologic safety of early-stage endoscopic submucosal dissection as a viable treatment option for carefully selected patients with colorectal cancer. After tissue resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection, if the lesion size is less than 20 mm, depth of invasion up to 2 mm may be considered safe in the absence of other high-risk pathologic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"109030"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.109030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection is increasingly used to treat early-stage colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection in this setting and the determinants of lymph node metastasis.

Methods: We reviewed patients who underwent colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for early-stage colorectal cancer at a tertiary center between 2011 and 2023. The primary outcome was the identification of high-risk pathologic features predictive of lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing oncologic colon resection following endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Results: We reviewed 1,398 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, and 83 (6%) had colorectal cancer. Twenty-four patients (29%) were closely monitored after endoscopic submucosal dissection, and 59 (71%) underwent oncologic colon resection because of high-risk pathologies of the endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen. In the oncologic colon resection group, the mean age was 62.7 years (±10.2), with 56% male predominance, and 14% showed positive lymph nodes in the final pathology. Analysis comparing patients with and without lymph node metastasis showed significant differences in sex, lesion size, submucosal invasion depth, and budding scores. Multivariate analysis showed that lesions with a submucosal invasion depth ≥2.00 mm of the endoscopic submucosal dissection resection specimen had higher odds of lymph node metastasis (odds ratio 18.7, P = .028), whereas lesions with a diameter >20 mm were associated with a lower likelihood of lymph node metastasis (odds ratio 0.07, P = .036).

Conclusion: The study highlights the oncologic safety of early-stage endoscopic submucosal dissection as a viable treatment option for carefully selected patients with colorectal cancer. After tissue resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection, if the lesion size is less than 20 mm, depth of invasion up to 2 mm may be considered safe in the absence of other high-risk pathologic factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期结直肠癌患者是否应进行内镜下粘膜剥离?
背景:内镜下粘膜夹层越来越多地用于治疗早期结直肠癌。本研究评估了内镜下粘膜下解剖在这种情况下的可行性和淋巴结转移的决定因素。方法:我们回顾了2011年至2023年在三级中心接受结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离治疗早期结直肠癌的患者。主要结果是确定内镜下粘膜下夹层术后行肿瘤结肠切除术患者的高危病理特征,预测淋巴结转移。结果:我们回顾了1398例接受内镜粘膜下剥离的患者,其中83例(6%)患有结直肠癌。24例(29%)患者在内镜下粘膜下剥离后接受密切监测,59例(71%)患者因内镜下粘膜下剥离标本的高危病理而行肿瘤性结肠切除术。肿瘤性结肠切除术组平均年龄62.7岁(±10.2岁),男性占56%,最终病理淋巴结阳性占14%。对有无淋巴结转移患者的分析显示,在性别、病变大小、粘膜下浸润深度和出芽评分方面存在显著差异。多因素分析显示,内镜下粘膜下夹层切除标本粘膜下浸润深度≥2.00 mm的病变发生淋巴结转移的可能性较高(优势比18.7,P = 0.028),而直径bb0 ~ 20mm的病变发生淋巴结转移的可能性较低(优势比0.07,P = 0.036)。结论:本研究强调了早期内镜下粘膜下剥离作为一种可行的治疗选择对于精心挑选的结直肠癌患者的肿瘤安全性。内镜下粘膜下剥离组织切除后,如果病变大小小于20mm,在没有其他高危病理因素的情况下,浸润深度达2mm可被认为是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
期刊最新文献
Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. Discussion. Discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1