The Lack of Effect of Botulinum Toxin-A on Upper Limb Activity in Chronic Stroke: A Short Report from the InTENSE Trial.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Toxins Pub Date : 2024-11-26 DOI:10.3390/toxins16120510
Ian D Cameron, Louise Ada, Maria Crotty, Mithu Palit, Lydia Huang, John Olver, Steven G Faux, Senen Gonzales, Brian Anthonisz, Malcolm Bowman, Yuriko Watanabe, Yan Chow, Rachel Milte, Julie Ratcliffe, Coralie K English, Natasha A Lannin
{"title":"The Lack of Effect of Botulinum Toxin-A on Upper Limb Activity in Chronic Stroke: A Short Report from the InTENSE Trial.","authors":"Ian D Cameron, Louise Ada, Maria Crotty, Mithu Palit, Lydia Huang, John Olver, Steven G Faux, Senen Gonzales, Brian Anthonisz, Malcolm Bowman, Yuriko Watanabe, Yan Chow, Rachel Milte, Julie Ratcliffe, Coralie K English, Natasha A Lannin","doi":"10.3390/toxins16120510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the effect of botulinum toxin-A on upper limb impairments and activity limitations in chronic stroke. This study is a secondary analysis of control group data from a national, multicenter, Phase III randomized trial with a masked outcome assessment. We studied 71 stroke survivors who received a botulinum toxin-A injection in any muscle(s) that crosses the wrist due to significant spasticity after a stroke greater than 3 months previously. We measured upper limb activity, spasticity, range of motion, grip strength, pain and other outcomes at injection and three months later. The median difference between injection and 3 months later was 0.0 blocks/s (interquartile range (IQR) 0.0) on the Box and Block Test, 0/4 (IQR 1) on the Tardieu Scale, 4 degrees (IQR 26) of wrist extension, 0.0 kg (IQR 2) of grip strength, 0.0 (IQR 1.5) on the 10 cm visual analogue scale for pain, 0/100 (IQR 21) on the 10 cm visual analogue scale for overall health, 0/3 (IQR 0) for self-care and -2 (IQR 8) for burden of care. In chronic stroke survivors who have little activity in their upper limb, botulinum toxin-A is not effective in improving any measured outcomes and does not appear to be clinically justified in this population with severe activity limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"16 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728757/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16120510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the effect of botulinum toxin-A on upper limb impairments and activity limitations in chronic stroke. This study is a secondary analysis of control group data from a national, multicenter, Phase III randomized trial with a masked outcome assessment. We studied 71 stroke survivors who received a botulinum toxin-A injection in any muscle(s) that crosses the wrist due to significant spasticity after a stroke greater than 3 months previously. We measured upper limb activity, spasticity, range of motion, grip strength, pain and other outcomes at injection and three months later. The median difference between injection and 3 months later was 0.0 blocks/s (interquartile range (IQR) 0.0) on the Box and Block Test, 0/4 (IQR 1) on the Tardieu Scale, 4 degrees (IQR 26) of wrist extension, 0.0 kg (IQR 2) of grip strength, 0.0 (IQR 1.5) on the 10 cm visual analogue scale for pain, 0/100 (IQR 21) on the 10 cm visual analogue scale for overall health, 0/3 (IQR 0) for self-care and -2 (IQR 8) for burden of care. In chronic stroke survivors who have little activity in their upper limb, botulinum toxin-A is not effective in improving any measured outcomes and does not appear to be clinically justified in this population with severe activity limitations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉毒毒素A对慢性脑卒中患者上肢活动缺乏影响:一篇来自高强度试验的简短报道。
我们研究了肉毒毒素a对慢性中风患者上肢损伤和活动限制的影响。本研究是对一项国家、多中心、III期随机试验的对照组数据进行的二次分析。我们研究了71例中风幸存者,他们在中风后超过3个月因明显痉挛而在任何穿过手腕的肌肉注射肉毒杆菌毒素a。我们测量了注射时和三个月后上肢活动、痉挛、活动范围、握力、疼痛和其他结果。区别注入和3个月后中值为0.0个盖帽/ s(四分位范围(差)0.0)盒子和块测试,0/4(差1)Tardieu规模,4度(IQR 26)手腕的扩展,握力的0.0公斤(差2),0.0 (IQR 1.5) 10厘米疼痛视觉模拟量表,0/100 (IQR 21)在10厘米视觉模拟量表整体健康,0/3自理(IQR 0)和2 (IQR 8)护理的负担。对于上肢很少活动的慢性中风幸存者,肉毒杆菌毒素a在改善任何测量结果方面都没有效果,并且在具有严重活动限制的人群中似乎没有临床合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Aflatoxin B1: Challenges and Strategies for the Intestinal Microbiota and Intestinal Health of Monogastric Animals. The First Large Identification of 3ANX and NX Producing Isolates of Fusarium graminearum in Manitoba, Western Canada. Updated Nematocyst Types in Tentacle of Venomous Box Jellyfish, Chironex indrasaksajiae(Sucharitakul, 2017) and Chiropsoides buitendijki(Horst, 1907) (Cnidaria, Cubozoa) in Thai Waters. Crustacean Zooplankton Ingestion of Potentially Toxic Microcystis: In Situ Estimation Using mcyE Gene Gut Content Detection in a Large Temperate Eutrophic Lake. Delphi Consensus on the Management of Spanish Patients with Post-Stroke Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Treated with Botulinum Toxin A: Result Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1