The role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Results from the upper tract collaborative network (UCAN).

Gianpaolo P Carpinito, Thomas Gerald, Patrick J Hensley, Austin J Martin, Maximilian Pallauf, Jonathan Pham, Roger Li, Aaron M Potretzke, Philippe E Spiess, Nirmish Singla, Jay D Raman, Jonathan Coleman, Surena F Matin, Vitaly Margulis
{"title":"The role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Results from the upper tract collaborative network (UCAN).","authors":"Gianpaolo P Carpinito, Thomas Gerald, Patrick J Hensley, Austin J Martin, Maximilian Pallauf, Jonathan Pham, Roger Li, Aaron M Potretzke, Philippe E Spiess, Nirmish Singla, Jay D Raman, Jonathan Coleman, Surena F Matin, Vitaly Margulis","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Utilization of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is inconsistent, and optimal patient selection for NAT is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of NAT in high grade UTUC undergoing RNU.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN) identified patients who underwent RNU for high grade UTUC between 2000 and 2022. NAT was examined as a primary exposure. NAT was defined as any systemic therapy prior to RNU. The outcomes of interest were extra-urothelial recurrence free survival (euRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 461 patients meeting criteria, 51.2% received NAT. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 24.1% experienced extra-urothelial recurrence at a median of 2.4 (1.0-5.2) years. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, NAT was associated with improved CSS (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.36-0.94). In clinically node negative patients receiving NAT, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved euRFS (P = 0.01), cancer-specific survival (P = 0.002), and overall survival (P = 0.002). A statistically significant benefit was not observed for clinically node positive patients receiving NAT in euRFS (P = 0.667), CSS (P = 0.200), or OS (P = 0.313).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAT was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with clinically node negative disease. These benefits were not consistently observed in those with clinically node positive disease, although there was trend toward improved outcomes on multivariable Cox models. Further prospective investigations regarding risk stratification and multimodal management are needed in patients with high grade UTUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Utilization of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is inconsistent, and optimal patient selection for NAT is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of NAT in high grade UTUC undergoing RNU.

Materials and methods: The UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN) identified patients who underwent RNU for high grade UTUC between 2000 and 2022. NAT was examined as a primary exposure. NAT was defined as any systemic therapy prior to RNU. The outcomes of interest were extra-urothelial recurrence free survival (euRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Among 461 patients meeting criteria, 51.2% received NAT. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 24.1% experienced extra-urothelial recurrence at a median of 2.4 (1.0-5.2) years. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, NAT was associated with improved CSS (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.36-0.94). In clinically node negative patients receiving NAT, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved euRFS (P = 0.01), cancer-specific survival (P = 0.002), and overall survival (P = 0.002). A statistically significant benefit was not observed for clinically node positive patients receiving NAT in euRFS (P = 0.667), CSS (P = 0.200), or OS (P = 0.313).

Conclusions: NAT was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with clinically node negative disease. These benefits were not consistently observed in those with clinically node positive disease, although there was trend toward improved outcomes on multivariable Cox models. Further prospective investigations regarding risk stratification and multimodal management are needed in patients with high grade UTUC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
The role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Results from the upper tract collaborative network (UCAN). Is ipsilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy the optimal substitute for bilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Risks of grade reclassification among patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer and PI-RADS 5 findings on prostate MRI. Impact of race and payor status on patterns of utilization of partial and radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma in California. Defining the genetic profile of prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1