Gianpaolo P Carpinito, Thomas Gerald, Patrick J Hensley, Austin J Martin, Maximilian Pallauf, Jonathan Pham, Roger Li, Aaron M Potretzke, Philippe E Spiess, Nirmish Singla, Jay D Raman, Jonathan Coleman, Surena F Matin, Vitaly Margulis
{"title":"The role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy for high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Results from the upper tract collaborative network (UCAN).","authors":"Gianpaolo P Carpinito, Thomas Gerald, Patrick J Hensley, Austin J Martin, Maximilian Pallauf, Jonathan Pham, Roger Li, Aaron M Potretzke, Philippe E Spiess, Nirmish Singla, Jay D Raman, Jonathan Coleman, Surena F Matin, Vitaly Margulis","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Utilization of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is inconsistent, and optimal patient selection for NAT is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of NAT in high grade UTUC undergoing RNU.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN) identified patients who underwent RNU for high grade UTUC between 2000 and 2022. NAT was examined as a primary exposure. NAT was defined as any systemic therapy prior to RNU. The outcomes of interest were extra-urothelial recurrence free survival (euRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 461 patients meeting criteria, 51.2% received NAT. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 24.1% experienced extra-urothelial recurrence at a median of 2.4 (1.0-5.2) years. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, NAT was associated with improved CSS (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.36-0.94). In clinically node negative patients receiving NAT, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved euRFS (P = 0.01), cancer-specific survival (P = 0.002), and overall survival (P = 0.002). A statistically significant benefit was not observed for clinically node positive patients receiving NAT in euRFS (P = 0.667), CSS (P = 0.200), or OS (P = 0.313).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAT was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with clinically node negative disease. These benefits were not consistently observed in those with clinically node positive disease, although there was trend toward improved outcomes on multivariable Cox models. Further prospective investigations regarding risk stratification and multimodal management are needed in patients with high grade UTUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.11.025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Utilization of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAT) prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is inconsistent, and optimal patient selection for NAT is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of NAT in high grade UTUC undergoing RNU.
Materials and methods: The UTUC Collaborative Network (UCAN) identified patients who underwent RNU for high grade UTUC between 2000 and 2022. NAT was examined as a primary exposure. NAT was defined as any systemic therapy prior to RNU. The outcomes of interest were extra-urothelial recurrence free survival (euRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).
Results: Among 461 patients meeting criteria, 51.2% received NAT. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 24.1% experienced extra-urothelial recurrence at a median of 2.4 (1.0-5.2) years. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, NAT was associated with improved CSS (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.36-0.94). In clinically node negative patients receiving NAT, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed improved euRFS (P = 0.01), cancer-specific survival (P = 0.002), and overall survival (P = 0.002). A statistically significant benefit was not observed for clinically node positive patients receiving NAT in euRFS (P = 0.667), CSS (P = 0.200), or OS (P = 0.313).
Conclusions: NAT was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with clinically node negative disease. These benefits were not consistently observed in those with clinically node positive disease, although there was trend toward improved outcomes on multivariable Cox models. Further prospective investigations regarding risk stratification and multimodal management are needed in patients with high grade UTUC.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.