Education for Healthcare Providers: Impact of Academic Detailing on Reducing Misinformation and Strengthening Influenza Vaccine Recommendations.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12060188
Kimberly C McKeirnan, Megan E Giruzzi, Damianne C Brand, Nick R Giruzzi, Kavya Vaitla, Juliet Dang
{"title":"Education for Healthcare Providers: Impact of Academic Detailing on Reducing Misinformation and Strengthening Influenza Vaccine Recommendations.","authors":"Kimberly C McKeirnan, Megan E Giruzzi, Damianne C Brand, Nick R Giruzzi, Kavya Vaitla, Juliet Dang","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12060188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recommendations from a trusted healthcare provider have been shown to be the most effective intervention for encouraging patients to be vaccinated. However, providers have reported feeling less prepared to address vaccination questions and having less time to discuss vaccines with patients than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers may benefit from a brief update about the available influenza vaccines and vaccination guidelines. Academic detailing is an evidence-based approach for preparing healthcare providers to discuss getting vaccinated with patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An academic detailing presentation was developed using influenza statistics, vaccination recommendations, and recent local and national immunization rate data. Academic detailing was conducted with physicians and community pharmacy personnel in Yakima County, Washington, between November 2023 and January 2024. Yakima County is designated as a medically underserved area due to a lack of providers. A pre-detailing survey was conducted to evaluate participant knowledge of current ACIP recommendations and gather opinions about local resident vaccination barriers. A post-detailing survey was conducted to gather participants' opinions about the value of detailing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to the training, 73% of providers believed it was important to discuss influenza vaccination with patients, but only 52% felt confident in combating misinformation. Healthcare providers believed misinformation and vaccine hesitancy are the most common barriers for Yakima County patients, but recent survey results showed that online scheduling systems, long wait times, and limited appointment hours were the predominant issues reported locally. Two out of 12 community pharmacy personnel and zero resident physicians correctly named all three preferentially recommended influenza vaccines for patients 65 years and older. Overall, 96% of detailing participants reported that the session was valuable, 87% believed it would help them combat vaccine misinformation, and 65% reported planning to have more conversations with patients about influenza vaccination after participating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physicians and community pharmacy immunizers found the influenza vaccines academic detailing to be valuable. Staying up to date on vaccination guidelines can prepare providers to be confident in having informed conversations with patients about getting vaccinated.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11678551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12060188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recommendations from a trusted healthcare provider have been shown to be the most effective intervention for encouraging patients to be vaccinated. However, providers have reported feeling less prepared to address vaccination questions and having less time to discuss vaccines with patients than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers may benefit from a brief update about the available influenza vaccines and vaccination guidelines. Academic detailing is an evidence-based approach for preparing healthcare providers to discuss getting vaccinated with patients.

Methods: An academic detailing presentation was developed using influenza statistics, vaccination recommendations, and recent local and national immunization rate data. Academic detailing was conducted with physicians and community pharmacy personnel in Yakima County, Washington, between November 2023 and January 2024. Yakima County is designated as a medically underserved area due to a lack of providers. A pre-detailing survey was conducted to evaluate participant knowledge of current ACIP recommendations and gather opinions about local resident vaccination barriers. A post-detailing survey was conducted to gather participants' opinions about the value of detailing.

Results: Prior to the training, 73% of providers believed it was important to discuss influenza vaccination with patients, but only 52% felt confident in combating misinformation. Healthcare providers believed misinformation and vaccine hesitancy are the most common barriers for Yakima County patients, but recent survey results showed that online scheduling systems, long wait times, and limited appointment hours were the predominant issues reported locally. Two out of 12 community pharmacy personnel and zero resident physicians correctly named all three preferentially recommended influenza vaccines for patients 65 years and older. Overall, 96% of detailing participants reported that the session was valuable, 87% believed it would help them combat vaccine misinformation, and 65% reported planning to have more conversations with patients about influenza vaccination after participating.

Conclusion: Physicians and community pharmacy immunizers found the influenza vaccines academic detailing to be valuable. Staying up to date on vaccination guidelines can prepare providers to be confident in having informed conversations with patients about getting vaccinated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健提供者的教育:学术细节对减少错误信息和加强流感疫苗建议的影响。
背景:值得信赖的医疗保健提供者的建议已被证明是鼓励患者接种疫苗的最有效干预措施。然而,服务提供者报告说,与COVID-19大流行之前相比,他们对解决疫苗接种问题的准备不足,与患者讨论疫苗的时间也更少。提供人员可以从现有流感疫苗和疫苗接种指南的简短更新中获益。学术细节是一种以证据为基础的方法,用于准备医疗保健提供者与患者讨论接种疫苗。方法:利用流感统计数据、疫苗接种建议以及最近的地方和国家免疫接种率数据,制定了一份学术详细报告。学术细节是在2023年11月至2024年1月期间与华盛顿州亚基马县的医生和社区药房人员一起进行的。由于缺乏医疗服务提供者,亚基马县被指定为医疗服务不足的地区。进行了一项预先详细的调查,以评估参与者对当前ACIP建议的了解程度,并收集有关当地居民接种疫苗障碍的意见。我们进行了一项细节化后的调查,以收集参与者对细节化价值的看法。结果:在培训之前,73%的医疗服务提供者认为与患者讨论流感疫苗接种是重要的,但只有52%的人对打击错误信息有信心。医疗保健提供者认为,错误信息和疫苗犹豫是亚基马县患者最常见的障碍,但最近的调查结果显示,在线调度系统、漫长的等待时间和有限的预约时间是当地报告的主要问题。12名社区药房工作人员中有2名和0名住院医师正确说出65岁及以上患者优先推荐的所有三种流感疫苗。总体而言,96%的详细参与者报告说,会议是有价值的,87%的人认为这将有助于他们打击疫苗错误信息,65%的人报告说,计划在参加后与患者就流感疫苗接种进行更多的对话。结论:医生和社区药房免疫人员认为流感疫苗的学术详细资料是有价值的。保持最新的疫苗接种指南可以使提供者有信心与患者就接种疫苗进行知情的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study Evaluating the Impact of an Algorithm-Driven Protocol on Guideline-Concordant Antibiotic Prescribing in a Rural Primary Care Setting. The Mentorship Blueprint: A Comprehensive Review for the Development of Programs in Pharmacy Education. Experiences in a Clinical Innovation Pharmacy Fellowship: A Novel Model of Ambulatory Care Training and Practice Advancement. Development of Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Integrative Care Model Led by Community Pharmacists. Exploration of Challenges and Opportunities for Good Pharmacy Practices in Bangladesh: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1