Comparative study of the oral hygiene status of users of mefakia (traditional tooth cleaning method) and modern toothbrushes among patients at the Holy Bethel Dental Clinic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BDJ Open Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1038/s41405-024-00290-9
Check Abebe, Yeshewas Abaynew
{"title":"Comparative study of the oral hygiene status of users of mefakia (traditional tooth cleaning method) and modern toothbrushes among patients at the Holy Bethel Dental Clinic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.","authors":"Check Abebe, Yeshewas Abaynew","doi":"10.1038/s41405-024-00290-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mefakia is a well-known traditional chewing wood used in Ethiopia to cleanse the mouth. Although mefakia is used in parallel with modern toothbrushes to improve oral hygiene, there is a gap in the literature regarding its comparative performance in removing plaque and maintaining good oral hygiene.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the oral hygiene status of patients using mefakia and modern toothbrushes at the Holy Bethel Dental Clinic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at the Holy Bethel Dental Clinic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A total of 246 patients (123 mefakia and 123 modern toothbrush users) were included in this study. Participants were selected using a systematic random sampling method. Data on demographic characteristics, oral hygiene practices, and clinical oral health parameters, such as the calculus index, were collected through interviews and clinical examinations. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23 to compare the oral hygiene status between the two groups. The results are presented in tables, diagrams, and text.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents were aged 20-39; 66.7% and 73.2% used mefakia and toothbrushes, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of the toothbrush users had good oral hygiene, whereas 65% of the mefakia users had good oral hygiene.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This finding suggests that mefakia and modern toothbrushes are comparable in their effectiveness in maintaining oral hygiene. Dental education should emphasize using available and affordable oral hygiene tools such as mechanical toothbrushes and fluoridated toothpaste to improve overall oral hygiene.</p>","PeriodicalId":36997,"journal":{"name":"BDJ Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BDJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00290-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mefakia is a well-known traditional chewing wood used in Ethiopia to cleanse the mouth. Although mefakia is used in parallel with modern toothbrushes to improve oral hygiene, there is a gap in the literature regarding its comparative performance in removing plaque and maintaining good oral hygiene.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the oral hygiene status of patients using mefakia and modern toothbrushes at the Holy Bethel Dental Clinic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at the Holy Bethel Dental Clinic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A total of 246 patients (123 mefakia and 123 modern toothbrush users) were included in this study. Participants were selected using a systematic random sampling method. Data on demographic characteristics, oral hygiene practices, and clinical oral health parameters, such as the calculus index, were collected through interviews and clinical examinations. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23 to compare the oral hygiene status between the two groups. The results are presented in tables, diagrams, and text.

Results: Most respondents were aged 20-39; 66.7% and 73.2% used mefakia and toothbrushes, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of the toothbrush users had good oral hygiene, whereas 65% of the mefakia users had good oral hygiene.

Conclusions: This finding suggests that mefakia and modern toothbrushes are comparable in their effectiveness in maintaining oral hygiene. Dental education should emphasize using available and affordable oral hygiene tools such as mechanical toothbrushes and fluoridated toothpaste to improve overall oral hygiene.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴圣伯特利牙科诊所患者中使用mefakia(传统牙齿清洁方法)和现代牙刷的口腔卫生状况的比较研究
背景:Mefakia是埃塞俄比亚一种著名的传统咀嚼木材,用于清洁口腔。虽然mefakia与现代牙刷同时用于改善口腔卫生,但文献中关于其在去除牙菌斑和保持良好口腔卫生方面的比较性能存在空白。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴圣伯特利牙科诊所使用mefakia和现代牙刷的患者口腔卫生状况。方法:这项比较横断面研究是在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的圣伯特利牙科诊所进行的。本研究共纳入246例患者,其中mefaakia 123例,现代牙刷使用者123例。研究对象采用系统随机抽样的方法进行选择。通过访谈和临床检查收集人口统计学特征、口腔卫生习惯和临床口腔健康参数(如牙石指数)的数据。采用SPSS version 23进行统计分析,比较两组患者口腔卫生状况。结果以表格、图表和文本的形式呈现。结果:受访者年龄以20 ~ 39岁为主;66.7%和73.2%的人使用纸巾和牙刷。67%的牙刷使用者有良好的口腔卫生,而65%的梅法基亚使用者有良好的口腔卫生。结论:这一发现表明,mefakia和现代牙刷在保持口腔卫生方面的有效性是相当的。牙科教育应强调使用现有和负担得起的口腔卫生工具,如机械牙刷和含氟牙膏,以改善整体口腔卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BDJ Open
BDJ Open Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of two different printing methods on the accuracy of full-guided implant insertion - a laboratory study in undergraduate dental students. Propolis mouthwashes efficacy in managing gingivitis and periodontitis: a systematic review of the latest findings. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of silver diamine fluoride versus mineral trioxide aggregate as indirect pulp capping agents in deeply carious first permanent molars a randomized clinical trial. Foundation dentists' attitudes and experiences in providing dental care for dependant older adults resident in care home settings. Clinical validity of fluorescence-based devices versus visual-tactile method in detection of secondary caries around resin composite restorations: diagnostic accuracy study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1