Impact of sarcopenic obesity on postoperative outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12451
Ryota Matsui, Keisuke Yonezu, Kazuma Rifu, Jun Watanabe, Noriyuki Inaki, Tetsu Fukunaga, Souya Nunobe
{"title":"Impact of sarcopenic obesity on postoperative outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ryota Matsui, Keisuke Yonezu, Kazuma Rifu, Jun Watanabe, Noriyuki Inaki, Tetsu Fukunaga, Souya Nunobe","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We elucidated the influence of sarcopenic obesity on postoperative outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search on MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify observational studies published from their inception to September 26, 2024. Studies involving patients who underwent radical resection for oesophago-gastric cancer and were evaluated for visceral fat mass and skeletal muscle mass through body composition were included in our analysis. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS) and postoperative complications. This protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023418403).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ultimately, 13 studies (involving 4912 patients) were included in our qualitative and quantitative analyses. Among these studies, three were prospective cohort studies, while the remaining 10 were retrospective cohort studies. Twelve studies specifically investigated gastric cancer, while one focused on esophageal cancer. The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity ranged from 5.7% to 28.7%. Compared to the absence of sarcopenic obesity, its presence worsens OS (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-2.15, heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>) = 66%, certainty of the evidence: low) and increases the risk of postoperative complications (relative risk ratio: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.29-2.73, I<sup>2</sup> = 77%, certainty of the evidence: moderate). The risk of bias in each study was deemed moderate to high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sarcopenic obesity worsens OS and increases the risk of postoperative complications in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer undergoing radical resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We elucidated the influence of sarcopenic obesity on postoperative outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search on MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify observational studies published from their inception to September 26, 2024. Studies involving patients who underwent radical resection for oesophago-gastric cancer and were evaluated for visceral fat mass and skeletal muscle mass through body composition were included in our analysis. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS) and postoperative complications. This protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023418403).

Results: Ultimately, 13 studies (involving 4912 patients) were included in our qualitative and quantitative analyses. Among these studies, three were prospective cohort studies, while the remaining 10 were retrospective cohort studies. Twelve studies specifically investigated gastric cancer, while one focused on esophageal cancer. The prevalence of sarcopenic obesity ranged from 5.7% to 28.7%. Compared to the absence of sarcopenic obesity, its presence worsens OS (hazard ratio: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-2.15, heterogeneity (I2) = 66%, certainty of the evidence: low) and increases the risk of postoperative complications (relative risk ratio: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.29-2.73, I2 = 77%, certainty of the evidence: moderate). The risk of bias in each study was deemed moderate to high.

Conclusions: Sarcopenic obesity worsens OS and increases the risk of postoperative complications in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer undergoing radical resection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌肉减少性肥胖对食管胃癌患者术后预后的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:我们研究了肌肉减少性肥胖对食管胃癌患者术后预后的影响。方法:我们在MEDLINE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、EMBASE、世界卫生组织国际临床试验平台搜索门户网站和ClinicalTrials.gov上进行了系统检索,以确定从开始到2024年9月26日发表的观察性研究。我们的分析纳入了对接受食管胃癌根治性切除术的患者的研究,并通过身体成分评估了内脏脂肪量和骨骼肌质量。评估的主要结果是总生存期(OS)和术后并发症。该协议已在PROSPERO中注册(CRD42023418403)。结果:最终,13项研究(涉及4912例患者)纳入我们的定性和定量分析。其中3项为前瞻性队列研究,10项为回顾性队列研究。12项研究专门针对胃癌,1项研究针对食管癌。肌肉减少型肥胖的患病率从5.7%到28.7%不等。与无肌少性肥胖相比,其存在加重了OS(风险比:1.52,95%可信区间:1.08-2.15,异质性(I2) = 66%,证据确定性低),并增加了术后并发症的风险(相对风险比:1.88,95% CI: 1.29-2.73, I2 = 77%,证据确定性中等)。每项研究的偏倚风险被认为是中等到高的。结论:肌少性肥胖加重了食管胃癌根治术患者的OS,增加了术后并发症的发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Implementing Surgical Interventions as a Triad Care Bundle. Comparison of Hernia Sac Transection and Full Sac Reduction for the Treatment of Inguinal Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. Understanding the Impact of Obesity on Liver Transplant Outcomes: A Comprehensive Analysis. Combining Transversus Abdominis Plane and Rectus Sheath Blocks in Open Inguinal Hernia Surgery Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Adding Semi Elemental Enteral Nutrition Formula Improves Tolerance Without Compromising Bowel Preparation Quality for Colonoscopy: A Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1