Total Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing in Capillary Samples: Proof-of-Principle and Feasibility Study for Home Self-Testing for Prostate Cancer.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfae144
Ravinder Sodi, Noel Young, Alessandra Tetucci, Timothy Woolley, Vishal Shah, Isabella Maund
{"title":"Total Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing in Capillary Samples: Proof-of-Principle and Feasibility Study for Home Self-Testing for Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Ravinder Sodi, Noel Young, Alessandra Tetucci, Timothy Woolley, Vishal Shah, Isabella Maund","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing interest in the use of capillary blood sampling (CBS) for testing biochemical analytes owing to the advantages it offers including home surveillance of chronic conditions. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the use of CBS was a viable and feasible method for testing total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA) concentrations in men with prostate disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men with known prostate disease were recruited from a urology clinic where they were being treated or followed up. Samples were collected in serum separating tubes by the finger-prick method using validated devices. Simultaneously, venous blood was collected by venipuncture. We used validated immunoassays on both the Roche (Cobas 801) and Beckman (DXi) platforms to measure TPSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 66 adult men between 26 and 64 years of age were tested. Across the concentration range of normal (0.3 µg/L) to pathological (314 µg/L), the results between CBS and venous samples were highly comparable and correlated (r = 0.997). The average bias was 0.112 µg/L or 1.07% and was not significant (P = 0.274). Overall, there was no apparent proportional or constant bias observed. Our data showed that TPSA may be stable in CBS stored at ambient temperature for up to 8 days in the samples tested using either the Roche or Beckman assays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This feasibility study shows that CBS and venous samples are highly correlated and there was negligible bias. Further validation work is now required for the measurement of TPSA in CBS and determining outcomes in men with prostate disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is growing interest in the use of capillary blood sampling (CBS) for testing biochemical analytes owing to the advantages it offers including home surveillance of chronic conditions. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the use of CBS was a viable and feasible method for testing total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA) concentrations in men with prostate disease.

Methods: Men with known prostate disease were recruited from a urology clinic where they were being treated or followed up. Samples were collected in serum separating tubes by the finger-prick method using validated devices. Simultaneously, venous blood was collected by venipuncture. We used validated immunoassays on both the Roche (Cobas 801) and Beckman (DXi) platforms to measure TPSA.

Results: In total, 66 adult men between 26 and 64 years of age were tested. Across the concentration range of normal (0.3 µg/L) to pathological (314 µg/L), the results between CBS and venous samples were highly comparable and correlated (r = 0.997). The average bias was 0.112 µg/L or 1.07% and was not significant (P = 0.274). Overall, there was no apparent proportional or constant bias observed. Our data showed that TPSA may be stable in CBS stored at ambient temperature for up to 8 days in the samples tested using either the Roche or Beckman assays.

Conclusions: This feasibility study shows that CBS and venous samples are highly correlated and there was negligible bias. Further validation work is now required for the measurement of TPSA in CBS and determining outcomes in men with prostate disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测毛细管样品:原理证明和前列腺癌家庭自我检测的可行性研究。
背景:由于毛细管血液采样(CBS)提供的优势,包括慢性疾病的家庭监测,人们对使用毛细管血液采样(CBS)进行生化分析的兴趣越来越大。在这项研究中,我们的目的是确定CBS是否是一种检测前列腺疾病男性总前列腺特异性抗原(TPSA)浓度的可行方法。方法:从泌尿外科诊所招募已知前列腺疾病的男性,在那里他们正在接受治疗或随访。采用经验证的器械,用手指穿刺法在血清分离管中采集样本。同时静脉穿刺采集静脉血。我们在Roche (Cobas 801)和Beckman (DXi)平台上使用经过验证的免疫测定法来测量TPSA。结果:共有66名年龄在26岁至64岁之间的成年男性接受了测试。在正常(0.3µg/L)至病理(314µg/L)浓度范围内,CBS与静脉样品的结果具有高度可比性和相关性(r = 0.997)。平均偏差为0.112µg/L或1.07%,无统计学意义(P = 0.274)。总的来说,没有观察到明显的比例或恒定偏差。我们的数据显示,在使用罗氏或贝克曼测定法测试的样品中,TPSA可以在环境温度下储存长达8天的CBS中保持稳定。结论:本可行性研究显示CBS与静脉样本高度相关,偏差可忽略不计。现在需要进一步的验证工作来测量CBS中的TPSA并确定前列腺疾病男性的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
Price Variability of Eight Common Laboratory Tests across All Licensed Tennessee Hospitals. High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays: From Implementation to Resource Utilization and Cost Effectiveness. Recommendations for Improved Clinical Practices for Total Thyroxine (T4) Assay. Detection of Crystals in Gram-Stained Synovial Fluid. Evaluation of Immunoassay Performance for the Detection of Opioids in Urine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1