Naomi Gefen, Barbara Mazer, Tal Krasovsky, Patrice L Weiss
{"title":"Novel rehabilitation technologies in pediatric rehabilitation: knowledge towards translation.","authors":"Naomi Gefen, Barbara Mazer, Tal Krasovsky, Patrice L Weiss","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2445017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Knowledge translation (KT) refers to the process of applying the most promising research outcomes into practice to ensure that new discoveries and innovations improve healthcare accessibility, effectiveness, and accountability. The objective of this perspective paper is to discuss and illustrate via examples how the KT process can be implemented in an era of rapid advancement in rehabilitation technologies that have the potential to significantly impact pediatric healthcare.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> Using Graham et al.'s (2006) Knowledge-to-Action cycle, which includes the knowledge creation funnel and the action cycle, we illustrate its application in implementing novel technologies into clinical practice and informing healthcare policy changes. We explore three successful applications of technology research: powered mobility, head support systems, and telerehabilitation. Additionally, we examine less clinically mature technologies such as brain-computer interfaces and robotic assistive devices, which are hindered by cost, robustness, and ease-of-use issues.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The paper concludes by discussing how technology acceptance and usage in clinical settings are influenced by various barriers and facilitators at different stakeholder levels, including clients, families, clinicians, management, researchers, developers, and society. Recommendations include focusing on early and ongoing design partnerships, transitioning from research to real-life implementation, and identifying optimal timing for clinical adoption of new technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2445017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Knowledge translation (KT) refers to the process of applying the most promising research outcomes into practice to ensure that new discoveries and innovations improve healthcare accessibility, effectiveness, and accountability. The objective of this perspective paper is to discuss and illustrate via examples how the KT process can be implemented in an era of rapid advancement in rehabilitation technologies that have the potential to significantly impact pediatric healthcare.
Methods: Using Graham et al.'s (2006) Knowledge-to-Action cycle, which includes the knowledge creation funnel and the action cycle, we illustrate its application in implementing novel technologies into clinical practice and informing healthcare policy changes. We explore three successful applications of technology research: powered mobility, head support systems, and telerehabilitation. Additionally, we examine less clinically mature technologies such as brain-computer interfaces and robotic assistive devices, which are hindered by cost, robustness, and ease-of-use issues.
Conclusions: The paper concludes by discussing how technology acceptance and usage in clinical settings are influenced by various barriers and facilitators at different stakeholder levels, including clients, families, clinicians, management, researchers, developers, and society. Recommendations include focusing on early and ongoing design partnerships, transitioning from research to real-life implementation, and identifying optimal timing for clinical adoption of new technologies.