Harnessing deliberative regulation to address inequities in accessing healthcare services in England.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q1 LAW Medical Law Review Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1093/medlaw/fwae042
Sabrina Germain, Gianluca Veronesi
{"title":"Harnessing deliberative regulation to address inequities in accessing healthcare services in England.","authors":"Sabrina Germain, Gianluca Veronesi","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>System-level decisions around the commissioning and provision of healthcare services in England have contributed to barriers in accessing the National Health Service. In this article, we ask how to better regulate resource allocation to ensure greater equity in access to healthcare services. First, we focus on the Health and Care Act 2022, which, drawing on principles of deliberative regulation to address health inequalities, initiates a shift away from previous regulatory approaches towards a collaborative decision-making model. We then shed light on the systemic factors creating and maintaining access barriers by considering shortcomings in previous regulatory approaches. With these in mind, we consider whether deliberative regulation-providing communities with resources to create normative solutions to intrinsic issues-could help address these systemic challenges. To assess the potential of laws or policies to achieve greater equity in healthcare, we also introduce an evaluative framework based on deliberative principles. We apply this framework to a case study of an Integrated Care System to gauge the extent to which the Health and Care Act 2022 has indeed been effectively adopting a deliberative approach by intentionally engaging marginalized communities in decision-making and devising accountability mechanisms for the allocation of healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

System-level decisions around the commissioning and provision of healthcare services in England have contributed to barriers in accessing the National Health Service. In this article, we ask how to better regulate resource allocation to ensure greater equity in access to healthcare services. First, we focus on the Health and Care Act 2022, which, drawing on principles of deliberative regulation to address health inequalities, initiates a shift away from previous regulatory approaches towards a collaborative decision-making model. We then shed light on the systemic factors creating and maintaining access barriers by considering shortcomings in previous regulatory approaches. With these in mind, we consider whether deliberative regulation-providing communities with resources to create normative solutions to intrinsic issues-could help address these systemic challenges. To assess the potential of laws or policies to achieve greater equity in healthcare, we also introduce an evaluative framework based on deliberative principles. We apply this framework to a case study of an Integrated Care System to gauge the extent to which the Health and Care Act 2022 has indeed been effectively adopting a deliberative approach by intentionally engaging marginalized communities in decision-making and devising accountability mechanisms for the allocation of healthcare resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用审议性监管解决英格兰在获得医疗保健服务方面的不平等问题。
在英格兰,围绕医疗服务的委托和提供的系统级决策导致了获取国民健康服务的障碍。在本文中,我们将探讨如何更好地规范资源分配,以确保获得医疗保健服务的更大公平性。首先,我们将重点放在《2022年卫生与保健法案》上,该法案利用审议监管原则来解决卫生不平等问题,启动了从以前的监管方法向协作决策模式的转变。然后,我们通过考虑以前的监管方法的缺点,阐明了产生和维持准入障碍的系统性因素。考虑到这些,我们考虑审议式监管——为社区提供资源,以制定针对内在问题的规范性解决方案——是否有助于应对这些系统性挑战。为了评估法律或政策在医疗保健方面实现更大公平的潜力,我们还引入了一个基于审议原则的评估框架。我们将这一框架应用于综合护理系统的案例研究,以衡量《2022年健康与护理法案》通过有意地让边缘化社区参与决策和设计医疗资源分配的问责机制,在多大程度上确实有效地采用了一种审议方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law Review
Medical Law Review MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Law Review is established as an authoritative source of reference for academics, lawyers, legal and medical practitioners, law students, and anyone interested in healthcare and the law. The journal presents articles of international interest which provide thorough analyses and comment on the wide range of topical issues that are fundamental to this expanding area of law. In addition, commentary sections provide in depth explorations of topical aspects of the field.
期刊最新文献
The two lives of the Mental Capacity Act: rethinking East-west binaries in comparative analysis. Mental health and capacity laws in Northern Ireland: examining the position of children and young people. Unlocking the promise of UK health data: considering the case for a charitable GP data trust. G v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2024] EWHC 2453 (FAM): two distinct routes to posthumous fertility treatment. Harnessing deliberative regulation to address inequities in accessing healthcare services in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1