Influence of Running Surface Using Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Middle- and Long-Distance Running Performance Measures.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.3390/sports12120329
Alejandro Alda-Blanco, Sergio Rodríguez-Barbero, Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza, Fernando Valero, Patricia Chico, Fernando González-Mohíno
{"title":"Influence of Running Surface Using Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Middle- and Long-Distance Running Performance Measures.","authors":"Alejandro Alda-Blanco, Sergio Rodríguez-Barbero, Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza, Fernando Valero, Patricia Chico, Fernando González-Mohíno","doi":"10.3390/sports12120329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated the effects of advanced footwear technology (AFT) spikes on running performance measures, spatiotemporal variables, and perceptive parameters on different surfaces (track and grass). <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-seven male trained runners were recruited for this study. In Experiment 1, participants performed 12 × 200 m at a self-perceived 3000 m running pace with a recovery of 5 min. Performance (time in each repetition), spatiotemporal, and perceptive parameters were measured. In Experiment 2, participants performed 8 × 5 min at 4.44 m/s while energy cost of running (W/kg), spatiotemporal, and perceptive parameters were measured. In both experiments the surface was randomized and mirror order between spike conditions (Polyether Block Amide (PEBA) and PEBA + Plate) was used. <b>Results:</b> Experiment 1: Runners were faster on the track (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and using PEBA + Plate spike (<i>p</i> = 0.049). Experiment 2: Running on grass increased energy cost (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and heart rate (<i>p</i> < 0.001) regardless of the spike used, while PEBA + Plate spike reduced respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (<i>p</i> = 0.041). Step frequency was different across surfaces (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and spikes (<i>p</i> = 0.002), with increased performance and comfort perceived with PEBA + Plate spikes (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.049). <b>Conclusions:</b> Running on the track surface with PEBA + Plate spikes enhanced auto-perceived 3000 m running performance, showed lower RER, and improved auto-perceptive comfort and performance. Running on grass surfaces increased energy cost and heart rate without differences between spike conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12120329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of advanced footwear technology (AFT) spikes on running performance measures, spatiotemporal variables, and perceptive parameters on different surfaces (track and grass). Methods: Twenty-seven male trained runners were recruited for this study. In Experiment 1, participants performed 12 × 200 m at a self-perceived 3000 m running pace with a recovery of 5 min. Performance (time in each repetition), spatiotemporal, and perceptive parameters were measured. In Experiment 2, participants performed 8 × 5 min at 4.44 m/s while energy cost of running (W/kg), spatiotemporal, and perceptive parameters were measured. In both experiments the surface was randomized and mirror order between spike conditions (Polyether Block Amide (PEBA) and PEBA + Plate) was used. Results: Experiment 1: Runners were faster on the track (p = 0.002) and using PEBA + Plate spike (p = 0.049). Experiment 2: Running on grass increased energy cost (p = 0.03) and heart rate (p < 0.001) regardless of the spike used, while PEBA + Plate spike reduced respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (p = 0.041). Step frequency was different across surfaces (p < 0.001) and spikes (p = 0.002), with increased performance and comfort perceived with PEBA + Plate spikes (p < 0.001; p = 0.049). Conclusions: Running on the track surface with PEBA + Plate spikes enhanced auto-perceived 3000 m running performance, showed lower RER, and improved auto-perceptive comfort and performance. Running on grass surfaces increased energy cost and heart rate without differences between spike conditions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用先进鞋类技术钉鞋的跑面对中长跑性能指标的影响。
目的:本研究评估了先进鞋类技术(AFT)钉鞋对不同表面(跑道和草地)跑步性能指标、时空变量和感知参数的影响。方法:本研究招募了27名男性跑步者。在实验1中,被试以自我感知的3000米跑速进行12 × 200米,恢复时间为5分钟。测试了表现(每次重复时间)、时空和知觉参数。实验2以4.44 m/s的速度进行8 × 5 min的运动,测量运动能量消耗(W/kg)、时空和知觉参数。在这两个实验中,表面都是随机的,并且在峰值条件(聚醚块酰胺(PEBA)和PEBA +板)之间使用镜像顺序。结果:实验1:跑步者在跑道上跑得更快(p = 0.002),使用PEBA + Plate钉钉跑得更快(p = 0.049)。实验2:在草地上跑步,无论使用不同的跑钉,都会增加能量消耗(p = 0.03)和心率(p < 0.001),而PEBA + Plate跑钉降低呼吸交换率(RER) (p = 0.041)。跨表面(p < 0.001)和尖峰(p = 0.002)的步频不同,PEBA +钢板尖峰可以提高性能和舒适度(p < 0.001;P = 0.049)。结论:使用PEBA + Plate钉鞋在跑道表面上跑步可提高自感知3000 m跑步性能,降低RER,提高自感知舒适性和性能。在草地上跑步增加了能量消耗和心率,在不同的刺激条件下没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lower-Limb Neuromuscular Profiles from Force Plate Testing During Elite Women's Basketball National Team Camps: A Retrospective Comparison by Final Roster Status. Accuracy of Voluntary Force Modulation During the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull. Development and Validation of a Perception, Attitude, and Practice of Physical Activity to Support Personalized Physical Activity Promotion Among U.S. Older Adults. Chronic Self-Myofascial Release in Road Cyclists: Effects on Cardiorespiratory Capacity, Metabolism, and Mechanical Power. Squash Under Strain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Injuries and Illnesses in Squash Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1