Influence of Running Surface Using Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Middle- and Long-Distance Running Performance Measures.

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.3390/sports12120329
Alejandro Alda-Blanco, Sergio Rodríguez-Barbero, Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza, Fernando Valero, Patricia Chico, Fernando González-Mohíno
{"title":"Influence of Running Surface Using Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Middle- and Long-Distance Running Performance Measures.","authors":"Alejandro Alda-Blanco, Sergio Rodríguez-Barbero, Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza, Fernando Valero, Patricia Chico, Fernando González-Mohíno","doi":"10.3390/sports12120329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated the effects of advanced footwear technology (AFT) spikes on running performance measures, spatiotemporal variables, and perceptive parameters on different surfaces (track and grass). <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-seven male trained runners were recruited for this study. In Experiment 1, participants performed 12 × 200 m at a self-perceived 3000 m running pace with a recovery of 5 min. Performance (time in each repetition), spatiotemporal, and perceptive parameters were measured. In Experiment 2, participants performed 8 × 5 min at 4.44 m/s while energy cost of running (W/kg), spatiotemporal, and perceptive parameters were measured. In both experiments the surface was randomized and mirror order between spike conditions (Polyether Block Amide (PEBA) and PEBA + Plate) was used. <b>Results:</b> Experiment 1: Runners were faster on the track (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and using PEBA + Plate spike (<i>p</i> = 0.049). Experiment 2: Running on grass increased energy cost (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and heart rate (<i>p</i> < 0.001) regardless of the spike used, while PEBA + Plate spike reduced respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (<i>p</i> = 0.041). Step frequency was different across surfaces (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and spikes (<i>p</i> = 0.002), with increased performance and comfort perceived with PEBA + Plate spikes (<i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.049). <b>Conclusions:</b> Running on the track surface with PEBA + Plate spikes enhanced auto-perceived 3000 m running performance, showed lower RER, and improved auto-perceptive comfort and performance. Running on grass surfaces increased energy cost and heart rate without differences between spike conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12120329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the effects of advanced footwear technology (AFT) spikes on running performance measures, spatiotemporal variables, and perceptive parameters on different surfaces (track and grass). Methods: Twenty-seven male trained runners were recruited for this study. In Experiment 1, participants performed 12 × 200 m at a self-perceived 3000 m running pace with a recovery of 5 min. Performance (time in each repetition), spatiotemporal, and perceptive parameters were measured. In Experiment 2, participants performed 8 × 5 min at 4.44 m/s while energy cost of running (W/kg), spatiotemporal, and perceptive parameters were measured. In both experiments the surface was randomized and mirror order between spike conditions (Polyether Block Amide (PEBA) and PEBA + Plate) was used. Results: Experiment 1: Runners were faster on the track (p = 0.002) and using PEBA + Plate spike (p = 0.049). Experiment 2: Running on grass increased energy cost (p = 0.03) and heart rate (p < 0.001) regardless of the spike used, while PEBA + Plate spike reduced respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (p = 0.041). Step frequency was different across surfaces (p < 0.001) and spikes (p = 0.002), with increased performance and comfort perceived with PEBA + Plate spikes (p < 0.001; p = 0.049). Conclusions: Running on the track surface with PEBA + Plate spikes enhanced auto-perceived 3000 m running performance, showed lower RER, and improved auto-perceptive comfort and performance. Running on grass surfaces increased energy cost and heart rate without differences between spike conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用先进鞋类技术钉鞋的跑面对中长跑性能指标的影响。
目的:本研究评估了先进鞋类技术(AFT)钉鞋对不同表面(跑道和草地)跑步性能指标、时空变量和感知参数的影响。方法:本研究招募了27名男性跑步者。在实验1中,被试以自我感知的3000米跑速进行12 × 200米,恢复时间为5分钟。测试了表现(每次重复时间)、时空和知觉参数。实验2以4.44 m/s的速度进行8 × 5 min的运动,测量运动能量消耗(W/kg)、时空和知觉参数。在这两个实验中,表面都是随机的,并且在峰值条件(聚醚块酰胺(PEBA)和PEBA +板)之间使用镜像顺序。结果:实验1:跑步者在跑道上跑得更快(p = 0.002),使用PEBA + Plate钉钉跑得更快(p = 0.049)。实验2:在草地上跑步,无论使用不同的跑钉,都会增加能量消耗(p = 0.03)和心率(p < 0.001),而PEBA + Plate跑钉降低呼吸交换率(RER) (p = 0.041)。跨表面(p < 0.001)和尖峰(p = 0.002)的步频不同,PEBA +钢板尖峰可以提高性能和舒适度(p < 0.001;P = 0.049)。结论:使用PEBA + Plate钉鞋在跑道表面上跑步可提高自感知3000 m跑步性能,降低RER,提高自感知舒适性和性能。在草地上跑步增加了能量消耗和心率,在不同的刺激条件下没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potential Importance of Maximal Upper Body Strength-Generating Qualities and Upper Body Strength Training for Performance of High-Intensity Running and Jumping Actions: A Scoping Review. Advanced Footwear Technology in Non-Elite Runners: A Survey of Training Practices and Reported Outcomes. Individuality Affects the Efficiency of Basketball Pre-Game Warm-Up on Players' Performance. Occurrence of Injuries in Different Phases of Judo Matches: Analysis Based on International Competitions. Prevalence of Lower Back Pain and Risk Factors in Equestrians: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1