Disparities in quality of life by race, gender, and sexual orientation: An intersectional analysis of population-representative data in Gauteng, South Africa

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117651
Nicholas Metheny , Gabriel John Dusing , Pedzisai Ndagurwa , Sthembiso Pollen Mkhize
{"title":"Disparities in quality of life by race, gender, and sexual orientation: An intersectional analysis of population-representative data in Gauteng, South Africa","authors":"Nicholas Metheny ,&nbsp;Gabriel John Dusing ,&nbsp;Pedzisai Ndagurwa ,&nbsp;Sthembiso Pollen Mkhize","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>South Africa's history of apartheid has led to persistent inequalities. While progress has been made since 1994, disparities in quality of life (QoL) remain, particularly along racial lines. This study examines how race, gender, and sexual orientation intersect to influence QoL in Gauteng - South Africa's most populous and economically vibrant province.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using data from the Gauteng City-Region Observatory's QoL 6 (2020/2021) Survey, we analyzed a sample of 10,760 respondents. We employed inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment (IPWRA) to estimate the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) of race, gender, and sexual minority status on QoL, while controlling for socioeconomic factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant QoL disparities were observed across intersecting identities. White heterosexual men had the highest QoL scores, while Black sexual minority women had the lowest. After adjusting for covariates, all Black groups exhibited significantly lower QoL scores compared to their White counterparts. The largest gap was between White sexual minority women and Black sexual minority men (ATE: -14.47; 95%CI: -17.18,-11.76). Within the Black population, heterosexual men had significantly higher QoL than heterosexual women (ATE: -0.98; 95%CI: -1.54, −0.42).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite progress since apartheid, substantial QoL disparities persist in Gauteng, primarily along racial lines, particularly in access to services and socio-economic opportunities. The intersectionality of race, gender, and sexual orientation creates distinct vulnerabilities, particularly for Black sexual minority women. These findings suggest that current policies aimed at improving equity may be insufficient. Addressing these disparities requires a multifaceted approach that considers the complex interplay of race, gender, and sexual orientation in shaping QoL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"366 ","pages":"Article 117651"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

South Africa's history of apartheid has led to persistent inequalities. While progress has been made since 1994, disparities in quality of life (QoL) remain, particularly along racial lines. This study examines how race, gender, and sexual orientation intersect to influence QoL in Gauteng - South Africa's most populous and economically vibrant province.

Methods

Using data from the Gauteng City-Region Observatory's QoL 6 (2020/2021) Survey, we analyzed a sample of 10,760 respondents. We employed inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment (IPWRA) to estimate the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) of race, gender, and sexual minority status on QoL, while controlling for socioeconomic factors.

Results

Significant QoL disparities were observed across intersecting identities. White heterosexual men had the highest QoL scores, while Black sexual minority women had the lowest. After adjusting for covariates, all Black groups exhibited significantly lower QoL scores compared to their White counterparts. The largest gap was between White sexual minority women and Black sexual minority men (ATE: -14.47; 95%CI: -17.18,-11.76). Within the Black population, heterosexual men had significantly higher QoL than heterosexual women (ATE: -0.98; 95%CI: -1.54, −0.42).

Conclusions

Despite progress since apartheid, substantial QoL disparities persist in Gauteng, primarily along racial lines, particularly in access to services and socio-economic opportunities. The intersectionality of race, gender, and sexual orientation creates distinct vulnerabilities, particularly for Black sexual minority women. These findings suggest that current policies aimed at improving equity may be insufficient. Addressing these disparities requires a multifaceted approach that considers the complex interplay of race, gender, and sexual orientation in shaping QoL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族、性别和性取向在生活质量上的差异:南非豪登省人口代表性数据的交叉分析。
背景:南非的种族隔离历史导致了持续的不平等。虽然自1994年以来取得了进展,但生活质量(QoL)的差异仍然存在,特别是在种族之间。本研究考察了种族、性别和性取向如何相互影响豪登省(南非人口最多、经济最活跃的省份)的生活质量。方法:利用豪登省城市-地区观测站第6次生活质量(2020/2021)调查数据,对10,760名受访者进行分析。在控制社会经济因素的情况下,我们采用回归调整逆概率加权(IPWRA)来估计种族、性别和性少数状况对生活质量的平均治疗效应(ATE)。结果:在交叉身份中观察到显著的生活质量差异。白人异性恋男性的生活质量得分最高,而黑人性少数女性的生活质量得分最低。在调整协变量后,所有黑人组的生活质量得分都明显低于白人组。白人性少数女性与黑人性少数男性之间的差距最大(ATE: -14.47;95%置信区间:-17.18,-11.76)。在黑人人群中,异性恋男性的生活质量显著高于异性恋女性(ATE: -0.98;95%ci: -1.54, -0.42)。结论:尽管自种族隔离以来取得了进步,但豪登省的生活质量差距仍然存在,主要是种族差异,特别是在获得服务和社会经济机会方面。种族、性别和性取向的相互交织造成了明显的脆弱性,尤其是对黑人性少数女性而言。这些发现表明,目前旨在改善公平的政策可能是不够的。解决这些差异需要多方面的方法,考虑种族、性别和性取向在塑造生活质量方面的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
“It does help but there's a limit …”: Young people's perspectives on policies to manage hot food takeaways opening near schools The time-lagged effect of noise exposure on noise annoyance: The role of temporal, spatial and social contexts The relationship between housing and asylum seekers’ mental health: A systematic review Editorial Board A biopsychosocial approach towards understanding disparities in exercise participation between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients living with knee osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1