“It does help but there's a limit …”: Young people's perspectives on policies to manage hot food takeaways opening near schools

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117810
B. Savory , C. Thompson , S. Hassan , J. Adams , B. Amies-Cull , M. Chang , D. Derbyshire , M. Keeble , B. Liu , A. Medina-Lara , O.T. Mytton , J. Rahilly , N. Rogers , R. Smith , M. White , T. Burgoine , S. Cummins
{"title":"“It does help but there's a limit …”: Young people's perspectives on policies to manage hot food takeaways opening near schools","authors":"B. Savory ,&nbsp;C. Thompson ,&nbsp;S. Hassan ,&nbsp;J. Adams ,&nbsp;B. Amies-Cull ,&nbsp;M. Chang ,&nbsp;D. Derbyshire ,&nbsp;M. Keeble ,&nbsp;B. Liu ,&nbsp;A. Medina-Lara ,&nbsp;O.T. Mytton ,&nbsp;J. Rahilly ,&nbsp;N. Rogers ,&nbsp;R. Smith ,&nbsp;M. White ,&nbsp;T. Burgoine ,&nbsp;S. Cummins","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Local authorities (LAs) in England are increasingly using the planning system to manage the proliferation of hot food takeaway outlets (‘takeaways’) near schools as part of a range of policies to promote healthy weight in children. These takeaway ‘management zones’ include restrictions on planning permission to open new takeaways within a certain distance of schools. In this qualitative study we explore young people's perspectives of management zones.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We purposively recruited 46 young people (aged 11–18 years) attending secondary school across two London LAs with operating management zones. We conducted semi-structured, walking group (“go-along”) interviews in January–February 2023 in the local food environment close to participants’ schools. We analysed data using framework analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants generally viewed management zones as reasonable and uncontroversial but were not always aware that management zones were in operation. Although participants understood that management zones prevented new outlets from opening, they observed they did not seem to reduce existing provision. This was viewed positively as it did not result in the closure of local takeaways perceived as important components of the social fabric of school life. Participants believed that the potential health impact of management zones is limited by their exclusive focus on takeaways as other food retail commonly patronised by young people, such as convenience stores, are important sources of unhealthy food. Participants also identified inadequacies in the wider food environment, including the school dining environment and access to food delivery apps.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that although young people find management zones acceptable and believe they have some positive impact on diet, they did not perceive management zones as effective as they could be. Participants articulated that the management of takeaways on their own is unlikely to reduce exposure to unhealthy foods. Widening the remit of planning policy to include outlets selling convenience foods may be important for policy optimisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"368 ","pages":"Article 117810"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500139X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Local authorities (LAs) in England are increasingly using the planning system to manage the proliferation of hot food takeaway outlets (‘takeaways’) near schools as part of a range of policies to promote healthy weight in children. These takeaway ‘management zones’ include restrictions on planning permission to open new takeaways within a certain distance of schools. In this qualitative study we explore young people's perspectives of management zones.

Methods

We purposively recruited 46 young people (aged 11–18 years) attending secondary school across two London LAs with operating management zones. We conducted semi-structured, walking group (“go-along”) interviews in January–February 2023 in the local food environment close to participants’ schools. We analysed data using framework analysis.

Results

Participants generally viewed management zones as reasonable and uncontroversial but were not always aware that management zones were in operation. Although participants understood that management zones prevented new outlets from opening, they observed they did not seem to reduce existing provision. This was viewed positively as it did not result in the closure of local takeaways perceived as important components of the social fabric of school life. Participants believed that the potential health impact of management zones is limited by their exclusive focus on takeaways as other food retail commonly patronised by young people, such as convenience stores, are important sources of unhealthy food. Participants also identified inadequacies in the wider food environment, including the school dining environment and access to food delivery apps.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that although young people find management zones acceptable and believe they have some positive impact on diet, they did not perceive management zones as effective as they could be. Participants articulated that the management of takeaways on their own is unlikely to reduce exposure to unhealthy foods. Widening the remit of planning policy to include outlets selling convenience foods may be important for policy optimisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
“It does help but there's a limit …”: Young people's perspectives on policies to manage hot food takeaways opening near schools The time-lagged effect of noise exposure on noise annoyance: The role of temporal, spatial and social contexts The relationship between housing and asylum seekers’ mental health: A systematic review Editorial Board A biopsychosocial approach towards understanding disparities in exercise participation between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White patients living with knee osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1