Presenteeism in people with previous and current epilepsy: Determinants and psychosocial associations

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2024.12.011
Shuichiro Neshige , Yoshiko Takebayashi , Ruoyi Ishikawa , Narumi Ohno , Koji Iida , Hirofumi Maruyama , Takahiro Tabuchi
{"title":"Presenteeism in people with previous and current epilepsy: Determinants and psychosocial associations","authors":"Shuichiro Neshige ,&nbsp;Yoshiko Takebayashi ,&nbsp;Ruoyi Ishikawa ,&nbsp;Narumi Ohno ,&nbsp;Koji Iida ,&nbsp;Hirofumi Maruyama ,&nbsp;Takahiro Tabuchi","doi":"10.1016/j.seizure.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We examined people with epilepsy (PWE) regarding presenteeism, an aspect of reduced work productivity due to health-related issues despite physical presence, with a focus on epilepsy treatment and psychosocial factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from 32,000 participants aged 16–83 years old that were obtained through a 2024 nationwide internet survey. The Work Functioning Impairment Scale, which measures \"presenteeism,\" was used to compare participants with and without a history of epilepsy. Odds ratios for presenteeism were calculated using univariable and multivariable analyses with two models based on sociodemographic and health-related variables. Propensity score matching was applied to equate groups with and without epilepsy in health-related variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 29,268 participants with valid responses, those with current epilepsy (<em>n</em> = 351) and in remission (<em>n</em> = 429) exhibited significantly higher presenteeism (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and psychological distress (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) versus participants without epilepsy (<em>n</em> = 28,488). Multivariable analysis confirmed current epilepsy was independently associated with higher presenteeism (odds ratio: 2.61; 95 % confidence interval: 2.05–3.33, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) in the sociodemographic model. After propensity score matching of 277 non-epilepsy and epilepsy participants, presenteeism remained significantly higher in current epilepsy patients versus those without (44.0 % vs. 28.2 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). When further adjusted for psychological disorders, the difference in presenteeism became negligible (46.2 % vs. 44.0 %, <em>p</em> = 0.716).</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This cross-sectional study confirms significant presenteeism in PWE, which persists even in remission cases. This suggests that multiple causal conditions, rather than epileptic activity itself, affect presenteeism. As the epilepsy effect on presenteeism substantially decreases when accounting for psychological disorders, addressing these disorders may promote social productivity in PWE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49552,"journal":{"name":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131124003479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We examined people with epilepsy (PWE) regarding presenteeism, an aspect of reduced work productivity due to health-related issues despite physical presence, with a focus on epilepsy treatment and psychosocial factors.

Methods

We used data from 32,000 participants aged 16–83 years old that were obtained through a 2024 nationwide internet survey. The Work Functioning Impairment Scale, which measures "presenteeism," was used to compare participants with and without a history of epilepsy. Odds ratios for presenteeism were calculated using univariable and multivariable analyses with two models based on sociodemographic and health-related variables. Propensity score matching was applied to equate groups with and without epilepsy in health-related variables.

Results

Among 29,268 participants with valid responses, those with current epilepsy (n = 351) and in remission (n = 429) exhibited significantly higher presenteeism (p < 0.0001) and psychological distress (p < 0.0001) versus participants without epilepsy (n = 28,488). Multivariable analysis confirmed current epilepsy was independently associated with higher presenteeism (odds ratio: 2.61; 95 % confidence interval: 2.05–3.33, p < 0.0001) in the sociodemographic model. After propensity score matching of 277 non-epilepsy and epilepsy participants, presenteeism remained significantly higher in current epilepsy patients versus those without (44.0 % vs. 28.2 %, p < 0.0001). When further adjusted for psychological disorders, the difference in presenteeism became negligible (46.2 % vs. 44.0 %, p = 0.716).

Significance

This cross-sectional study confirms significant presenteeism in PWE, which persists even in remission cases. This suggests that multiple causal conditions, rather than epileptic activity itself, affect presenteeism. As the epilepsy effect on presenteeism substantially decreases when accounting for psychological disorders, addressing these disorders may promote social productivity in PWE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既往和当前癫痫患者的出勤:决定因素和社会心理关联。
目的:我们检查了癫痫患者(PWE)的出勤情况,这是尽管身体存在,但由于健康相关问题导致工作效率降低的一个方面,重点关注癫痫治疗和社会心理因素。方法:我们使用了来自32,000名年龄在16-83岁之间的参与者的数据,这些数据是通过2024年全国互联网调查获得的。测量“出勤率”的工作功能障碍量表被用来比较有和没有癫痫史的参与者。出勤的优势比采用单变量和多变量分析计算,采用基于社会人口统计学和健康相关变量的两种模型。应用倾向评分匹配将与健康相关变量相等的有癫痫和无癫痫组。结果:在29,268名有有效反应的参与者中,患有癫痫(n = 351)和缓解期(n = 429)的参与者与没有癫痫的参与者(n = 28,488)相比,显着更高的出勤率(p < 0.0001)和心理困扰(p < 0.0001)。多变量分析证实当前癫痫与较高出勤率独立相关(优势比:2.61;95%置信区间:2.05-3.33,p < 0.0001)。在对277名非癫痫和癫痫参与者进行倾向评分匹配后,患有癫痫的患者出勤率明显高于没有癫痫的患者(44.0%比28.2%,p < 0.0001)。当进一步调整心理障碍时,出勤率的差异变得可以忽略不计(46.2%对44.0%,p = 0.716)。意义:这项横断面研究证实了PWE患者的显著出勤,即使在缓解病例中也持续存在。这表明,影响出勤的是多种病因,而不是癫痫活动本身。当考虑到心理障碍时,癫痫对出勤的影响大大降低,解决这些障碍可能会促进PWE的社会生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
231
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Seizure - European Journal of Epilepsy is an international journal owned by Epilepsy Action (the largest member led epilepsy organisation in the UK). It provides a forum for papers on all topics related to epilepsy and seizure disorders.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Predictive performances of STESS and EMSE in a Norwegian adult status epilepticus cohort” [Seizure 70 (2019) 6-11] A call for better information about epilepsy: The next of kin perspective Alterations in white matter integrity and correlations with clinical characteristics in children with non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy Presenteeism in people with previous and current epilepsy: Determinants and psychosocial associations Performance validity tests in people with epilepsy: A review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1