Accuracy of Electronic Health Record Phenotypes to Detect Recognition of Hypertension in Pediatric Primary Care.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2024.102629
James T Nugent, Victoria Cueto, Christina Tong, Mona Sharifi
{"title":"Accuracy of Electronic Health Record Phenotypes to Detect Recognition of Hypertension in Pediatric Primary Care.","authors":"James T Nugent, Victoria Cueto, Christina Tong, Mona Sharifi","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2024.102629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of extractable electronic health record (EHR) data to define clinician recognition of hypertension in pediatric primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used EHR data to perform a cross-sectional study of children aged 3 to 18 years at well-visits in Connecticut from 2018 to 2023 (n = 50,290) that had either 1) incident hypertension (hypertensive blood pressure [BP] at the well-visit and ≥2 prior hypertensive BPs without prior diagnosis of hypertension) or 2) isolated hypertensive BP at the well-visit without necessarily having prior hypertensive BPs. We tested the accuracy of EHR phenotypes to detect recognition of incident hypertension or hypertensive BP using structured elements, including diagnosis codes, problem list entries, number of BP measurements, orders, and follow-up information. The primary outcome of hypertension recognition was determined by chart review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 239 children with incident hypertension and a random sample of 220 children with hypertensive BP, 13% in each sample had clinician recognition of hypertension and hypertensive BP, respectively. An algorithm using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) encounter diagnosis code, ICD-10 problem list, or multiple BPs during the visit had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for attention to incident hypertension (AUC, 0.84; sensitivity, 71.9%; specificity, 95.7%). Adding follow-up BP information to this algorithm had the highest AUC for attention to hypertensive BP (AUC, 0.85; sensitivity, 75.9%; specificity, 93.2%). For patients with hypertension recognition by chart review, ∼20% had only free text documentation of hypertension without any structured elements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHR phenotypes for hypertension recognition have high specificity and moderate sensitivity and may be used in clinician decision support to improve guideline-recommended care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2024.102629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of extractable electronic health record (EHR) data to define clinician recognition of hypertension in pediatric primary care.

Methods: We used EHR data to perform a cross-sectional study of children aged 3 to 18 years at well-visits in Connecticut from 2018 to 2023 (n = 50,290) that had either 1) incident hypertension (hypertensive blood pressure [BP] at the well-visit and ≥2 prior hypertensive BPs without prior diagnosis of hypertension) or 2) isolated hypertensive BP at the well-visit without necessarily having prior hypertensive BPs. We tested the accuracy of EHR phenotypes to detect recognition of incident hypertension or hypertensive BP using structured elements, including diagnosis codes, problem list entries, number of BP measurements, orders, and follow-up information. The primary outcome of hypertension recognition was determined by chart review.

Results: Among 239 children with incident hypertension and a random sample of 220 children with hypertensive BP, 13% in each sample had clinician recognition of hypertension and hypertensive BP, respectively. An algorithm using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) encounter diagnosis code, ICD-10 problem list, or multiple BPs during the visit had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for attention to incident hypertension (AUC, 0.84; sensitivity, 71.9%; specificity, 95.7%). Adding follow-up BP information to this algorithm had the highest AUC for attention to hypertensive BP (AUC, 0.85; sensitivity, 75.9%; specificity, 93.2%). For patients with hypertension recognition by chart review, ∼20% had only free text documentation of hypertension without any structured elements.

Conclusions: EHR phenotypes for hypertension recognition have high specificity and moderate sensitivity and may be used in clinician decision support to improve guideline-recommended care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科初级保健中检测高血压的电子健康记录表型的准确性。
目的:评价可提取电子健康记录(EHR)数据的准确性,以确定儿科初级保健中临床医生对高血压的认识。方法:我们使用电子病历数据对康涅狄格州2018-2023年出诊时3-18岁的儿童(n=50,290)进行横断面研究,这些儿童有:(1)突发高血压(出诊时血压高,既往血压≥2,但未确诊高血压);或(2)在探井时发现孤立的高血压,而不必事先有高血压。我们使用结构化元素(包括诊断代码、问题列表条目、血压测量次数、订单和随访信息)测试了EHR表型检测识别突发高血压或高血压血压的准确性。高血压识别的主要结局是通过图表回顾来确定的。结果:239例高血压患儿和随机抽取的220例高血压患儿中,分别有13%的患儿有高血压和高血压的临床认知。使用ICD-10遭遇诊断代码、ICD-10问题列表或就诊期间多个bp的算法对高血压事件的关注AUC最高(AUC, 0.84;敏感性,71.9%;特异性,95.7%)。在该算法中加入随访血压信息,对高血压血压的关注AUC最高(AUC, 0.85;敏感性,75.9%;特异性,93.2%)。在通过图表复习识别高血压的患者中,约20%只有高血压的自由文本文档,没有任何结构化元素。结论:EHR表型对高血压的识别具有高特异性和中等敏感性,可用于临床医生决策支持,以改善指南推荐的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
期刊最新文献
Simulation-based training improves developmental hip dysplasia examination and diagnosis skills on newborns. Use of "Bug-in-the-Ear" Technology in Improving Pediatric Residents' Skills in Diagnosis and Treatment of ADHD. Youth Survivors of Human Trafficking: On Improving Healthcare Access and Treatment. "And Still We Rise: Advances in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Antiracism in Academic Pediatrics". Goals of Care Discussion Characteristics and Disparities in Children with Medical Complexity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1