Perceptions of Medically Complex Patients Enrolled in an Ambulatory Intensive Care Unit at a Healthcare-for-the-Homeless Clinic.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230403R1
Brian Chan, Elizabeth Hulen, Samuel T Edwards, Anna Geduldig, Meg Devoe, Christina Nicolaidis, P Todd Korthuis, Somnath Saha
{"title":"Perceptions of Medically Complex Patients Enrolled in an Ambulatory Intensive Care Unit at a Healthcare-for-the-Homeless Clinic.","authors":"Brian Chan, Elizabeth Hulen, Samuel T Edwards, Anna Geduldig, Meg Devoe, Christina Nicolaidis, P Todd Korthuis, Somnath Saha","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230403R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is great interest in intensive primary care interventions to address high utilization among medically and socially complex patients. How patients experience these interventions has received less attention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand patients' experience of intensive primary care, we interviewed patients receiving care from the Streamlined Unified Meaningfully Managed Interdisciplinary Team (SUMMIT), an ambulatory intensive care intervention at an urban federally qualified health center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 25 participants enrolled in the SUMMIT randomized controlled trial and conducted a Reflective Thematic Analysis using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients reported high levels of medical and social needs that outstripped prior levels of care and resources. They perceived multiple benefits of SUMMIT through the following themes: 1) Team-based care with improved access to services. Patients appreciated their medical and social needs being met, through higher-level, multidisciplinary care. 2) Caring relationships. Patients described the SUMMIT team as being like family and felt that team members had a genuine sense of duty and obligation toward them. 3) Overcoming stigma. Patients felt valued and treated with dignity. 4) Evolving self-efficacy. Over time, patients experienced increasing success, including engagement in care and improved health behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients perceived the SUMMIT team as better meeting their health-related needs, compared with traditional primary care. They spoke of the team as family and felt humanized and supported in overcoming barriers to engagement, which led to increased self-efficacy. Evaluations assessing the effectiveness of intensive primary care should measure potential patient-centered benefits beyond short-term utilization and cost reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230403R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is great interest in intensive primary care interventions to address high utilization among medically and socially complex patients. How patients experience these interventions has received less attention.

Objective: To better understand patients' experience of intensive primary care, we interviewed patients receiving care from the Streamlined Unified Meaningfully Managed Interdisciplinary Team (SUMMIT), an ambulatory intensive care intervention at an urban federally qualified health center.

Methods: We interviewed 25 participants enrolled in the SUMMIT randomized controlled trial and conducted a Reflective Thematic Analysis using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.

Results: Patients reported high levels of medical and social needs that outstripped prior levels of care and resources. They perceived multiple benefits of SUMMIT through the following themes: 1) Team-based care with improved access to services. Patients appreciated their medical and social needs being met, through higher-level, multidisciplinary care. 2) Caring relationships. Patients described the SUMMIT team as being like family and felt that team members had a genuine sense of duty and obligation toward them. 3) Overcoming stigma. Patients felt valued and treated with dignity. 4) Evolving self-efficacy. Over time, patients experienced increasing success, including engagement in care and improved health behaviors.

Conclusion: Patients perceived the SUMMIT team as better meeting their health-related needs, compared with traditional primary care. They spoke of the team as family and felt humanized and supported in overcoming barriers to engagement, which led to increased self-efficacy. Evaluations assessing the effectiveness of intensive primary care should measure potential patient-centered benefits beyond short-term utilization and cost reduction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在无家可归者诊所的门诊重症监护病房登记的医学复杂患者的看法。
背景:人们对重症初级保健干预措施非常感兴趣,以解决医疗和社会复杂患者的高利用率。患者如何经历这些干预措施却很少受到关注。目的:为了更好地了解患者的重症初级护理体验,我们采访了接受精简统一有意义管理的跨学科团队(SUMMIT)护理的患者,该团队是一家城市联邦合格医疗中心的门诊重症护理干预项目。方法:我们采访了25名参加SUMMIT随机对照试验的参与者,并使用混合归纳-演绎方法进行了反思性主题分析。结果:患者报告了高水平的医疗和社会需求,超过了以前的护理和资源水平。他们通过以下主题认识到SUMMIT的多重好处:1)以团队为基础的护理,改善了获得服务的机会。患者赞赏通过更高水平的多学科护理满足了他们的医疗和社会需要。2)关爱关系。患者形容SUMMIT团队就像家人一样,觉得团队成员对他们有一种真正的责任感和义务。3)克服耻辱。病人感到被重视和有尊严地对待。4)自我效能的进化。随着时间的推移,患者经历了越来越多的成功,包括参与护理和改善健康行为。结论:与传统的初级保健相比,患者认为SUMMIT团队能更好地满足他们与健康相关的需求。他们把团队视为家人,在克服参与障碍时感到人性化和得到支持,从而提高了自我效能感。评估重症初级保健的有效性应衡量以患者为中心的潜在效益,而不仅仅是短期利用和成本降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Care Coordination: How Is It Implemented and Is It Different If a Social Worker Is on the Team? Examining the Construct Stability of the Family Medicine Certification Scale Between One-Day Exam and Longitudinal Assessment. Strategies for Implementing Integrated Behavioral Health into Health Centers. The Minority Tax: Stories from Family Physicians. The One Taboo Question.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1