Stone selection by wild chimpanzees shares patterns with Oldowan hominins.

IF 3.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Human Evolution Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103625
D R Braun, S Carvalho, R S Kaplan, M Beardmore-Herd, T Plummer, D Biro, T Matsuzawa
{"title":"Stone selection by wild chimpanzees shares patterns with Oldowan hominins.","authors":"D R Braun, S Carvalho, R S Kaplan, M Beardmore-Herd, T Plummer, D Biro, T Matsuzawa","doi":"10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of broad tool repertoires to increase dietary flexibility through extractive foraging behaviors is shared by humans and their closest living relatives (chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes). However, comparisons between tool use in ancient human ancestors (hominins) and chimpanzees are limited by differences in their toolkits. One feature shared by primate and hominin toolkits is rock selection based on physical properties of the stones and the targets of foraging behaviors. Here, we document the selectivity patterns of stone tools used by wild chimpanzees to crack nuts at Bossou, Guinea, through controlled experiments that introduce rocks unknown to this population. Experiments incorporate specific rock types because previous studies document hominin selection of these lithologies at Kanjera South 2 Ma. We investigate decisions made by chimpanzees when selecting stones that vary in their mechanical properties-features not directly visible to the individual. Results indicate that the selection of anvils and hammers is linked to task-specific mechanical properties. Chimpanzees select harder stones for hammers and softer stones for anvils, indicating an understanding of specific properties for distinct functions. Selectivity of rock types suggests that chimpanzees assess the appropriate materials for functions by discriminating these 'invisible' properties. Adults identify mechanical properties through individual learning, and juveniles often reused the tools selected by adults. Selection of specific rock types may be transmitted through the reuse of combinations of rocks. These patterns of stone selection parallel what is documented for Oldowan hominins. The processes identified in this experiment provide insights into the discrete nature of hominin rock selection patterns in Plio-Pleistocene stone artifact production.</p>","PeriodicalId":54805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Evolution","volume":"199 ","pages":"103625"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2024.103625","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of broad tool repertoires to increase dietary flexibility through extractive foraging behaviors is shared by humans and their closest living relatives (chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes). However, comparisons between tool use in ancient human ancestors (hominins) and chimpanzees are limited by differences in their toolkits. One feature shared by primate and hominin toolkits is rock selection based on physical properties of the stones and the targets of foraging behaviors. Here, we document the selectivity patterns of stone tools used by wild chimpanzees to crack nuts at Bossou, Guinea, through controlled experiments that introduce rocks unknown to this population. Experiments incorporate specific rock types because previous studies document hominin selection of these lithologies at Kanjera South 2 Ma. We investigate decisions made by chimpanzees when selecting stones that vary in their mechanical properties-features not directly visible to the individual. Results indicate that the selection of anvils and hammers is linked to task-specific mechanical properties. Chimpanzees select harder stones for hammers and softer stones for anvils, indicating an understanding of specific properties for distinct functions. Selectivity of rock types suggests that chimpanzees assess the appropriate materials for functions by discriminating these 'invisible' properties. Adults identify mechanical properties through individual learning, and juveniles often reused the tools selected by adults. Selection of specific rock types may be transmitted through the reuse of combinations of rocks. These patterns of stone selection parallel what is documented for Oldowan hominins. The processes identified in this experiment provide insights into the discrete nature of hominin rock selection patterns in Plio-Pleistocene stone artifact production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生黑猩猩对石头的选择与奥尔德瓦古人类有共同的模式。
人类和他们的近亲(黑猩猩,泛穴居人)共同使用广泛的工具库,通过采掘觅食行为来增加饮食的灵活性。然而,对古代人类祖先(古人类)和黑猩猩使用工具的比较受到工具包差异的限制。灵长类动物和人类工具箱共有的一个特征是,根据石头的物理性质和觅食行为的目标来选择岩石。在这里,我们记录了在几内亚Bossou,野生黑猩猩使用石器来敲开坚果的选择性模式,通过控制实验,引入了未知的岩石。实验纳入了特定的岩石类型,因为以前的研究记录了在Kanjera South 2 Ma这些岩性的人类选择。我们研究了黑猩猩在选择不同机械性能的石头时所做的决定——这些特征对个体来说是不直接可见的。结果表明,砧和锤的选择与特定任务的机械性能有关。黑猩猩选择较硬的石头做锤子,较软的石头做铁砧,这表明它们对不同功能的特定属性有不同的理解。岩石类型的选择性表明黑猩猩通过区分这些“看不见的”属性来评估合适的功能材料。成年人通过个人学习来识别机械特性,青少年经常重复使用成年人选择的工具。特定岩石类型的选择可以通过岩石组合的重复使用来传递。这些选择石头的模式与记载的奥尔多瓦古人类相似。在本实验中确定的过程提供了对上新世-更新世石器制品生产中人类岩石选择模式的离散性质的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Evolution
Journal of Human Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Evolution concentrates on publishing the highest quality papers covering all aspects of human evolution. The central focus is aimed jointly at paleoanthropological work, covering human and primate fossils, and at comparative studies of living species, including both morphological and molecular evidence. These include descriptions of new discoveries, interpretative analyses of new and previously described material, and assessments of the phylogeny and paleobiology of primate species. Submissions should address issues and questions of broad interest in paleoanthropology.
期刊最新文献
New modern and Pleistocene fossil micromammal assemblages from Swartkrans, South Africa: Paleobiodiversity, taphonomic, and environmental context. Contextualizing the Upper Paleolithic of the Armenian Highlands: New data from Solak-1, central Armenia. Reanalysis of Samburupithecus reveals similarities to nyanzapithecines. Taxonomic revision of the SK 15 mandible based on bone and tooth structural organization. Postcranial evidence does not support habitual bipedalism in Sahelanthropus tchadensis: A reply to Daver et al. (2022).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1