The Effect of Intraset Rest Periods on External and Internal Load During Small-Sided Games in Soccer.

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.3390/sports12120331
Ioannis Ispirlidis, Dimitrios Pantazis, Athanasios Poulios, Alexandra Avloniti, Theodoros Stampoulis, Yiannis Michailidis, Konstantinos Troupkos, Evangelos Evangelou, Dimitrios Draganidis, Dimitrios Balampanos, Nikolaos-Orestis Retzepis, Maria Protopapa, Nikolaos Mantzouranis, Nikolaos Zaras, Maria Michalopoulou, Ioannis G Fatouros, Athanasios Chatzinikolaou
{"title":"The Effect of Intraset Rest Periods on External and Internal Load During Small-Sided Games in Soccer.","authors":"Ioannis Ispirlidis, Dimitrios Pantazis, Athanasios Poulios, Alexandra Avloniti, Theodoros Stampoulis, Yiannis Michailidis, Konstantinos Troupkos, Evangelos Evangelou, Dimitrios Draganidis, Dimitrios Balampanos, Nikolaos-Orestis Retzepis, Maria Protopapa, Nikolaos Mantzouranis, Nikolaos Zaras, Maria Michalopoulou, Ioannis G Fatouros, Athanasios Chatzinikolaou","doi":"10.3390/sports12120331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to compare the internal and external load in continuous and intermittent small-sided games (SSG) formats. Eight semi-professional soccer players participated in the study, and they completed three protocols: (a) I-intermittent SSG protocol (Int-I, 4 sets of 4 min with a 3 min recovery); (b) Continuous SSG protocol (Con, 2 sets of 8 min with a 3 min recovery); (c) II-SSG protocol (Int-II, 4 sets of 4 min, where each set includes 1 min of exercise with varying recovery periods (10, 20, 30 s), with a 3 min recovery period between sets). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the dependent variables, with significance determined at <i>p</i> < 0.05. The three protocols differed in total distance covered and in distance covered at speeds >19 km/h, with the Int-II protocol resulting in the greatest distance covered (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, players in the Con protocol exercised at a higher percentage of their maximum heart rate (%HRmax) (<i>p</i> < 0.05), while the highest RPE value was observed in the Int-I interval protocol (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The external load experienced by players in intermittent SSG protocols is higher, while internal load (%HRmax) remains relatively low. This effect is especially notable in the new intermittent exercise model proposed in this study, which incorporates progressively increasing recovery times within each exercise set. Coaches can use this model to increase players' external load without causing a heightened perception of fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11728832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12120331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the internal and external load in continuous and intermittent small-sided games (SSG) formats. Eight semi-professional soccer players participated in the study, and they completed three protocols: (a) I-intermittent SSG protocol (Int-I, 4 sets of 4 min with a 3 min recovery); (b) Continuous SSG protocol (Con, 2 sets of 8 min with a 3 min recovery); (c) II-SSG protocol (Int-II, 4 sets of 4 min, where each set includes 1 min of exercise with varying recovery periods (10, 20, 30 s), with a 3 min recovery period between sets). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the dependent variables, with significance determined at p < 0.05. The three protocols differed in total distance covered and in distance covered at speeds >19 km/h, with the Int-II protocol resulting in the greatest distance covered (p < 0.05). Additionally, players in the Con protocol exercised at a higher percentage of their maximum heart rate (%HRmax) (p < 0.05), while the highest RPE value was observed in the Int-I interval protocol (p < 0.05). The external load experienced by players in intermittent SSG protocols is higher, while internal load (%HRmax) remains relatively low. This effect is especially notable in the new intermittent exercise model proposed in this study, which incorporates progressively increasing recovery times within each exercise set. Coaches can use this model to increase players' external load without causing a heightened perception of fatigue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小型足球比赛中场内休息时间对外部和内部负荷的影响。
本研究的目的是比较连续和间歇小面游戏(SSG)格式的内部和外部负荷。8名半职业足球运动员参与了这项研究,他们完成了三个方案:(a)间歇SSG方案(Int-I, 4组4分钟,恢复时间3分钟);(b)连续SSG方案(Con, 2组8分钟,恢复时间3分钟);(c) II-SSG方案(Int-II, 4组4分钟,其中每组包括1分钟的运动,不同的恢复时间(10、20、30秒),每组之间有3分钟的恢复时间)。因变量分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA), p < 0.05为显著性。三种协议在总覆盖距离和速度为bb0 ~ 19 km/h时的覆盖距离上存在差异,其中Int-II协议的覆盖距离最大(p < 0.05)。此外,Con方案的参与者以更高百分比的最大心率(%HRmax)进行运动(p < 0.05),而在Int-I间隔方案中观察到最高的RPE值(p < 0.05)。在间歇性SSG协议中,玩家所经历的外部负载较高,而内部负载(%HRmax)仍然相对较低。这种效果在本研究提出的新的间歇运动模型中尤为显著,该模型在每个运动组中逐步增加恢复时间。教练可以使用这个模型来增加球员的外部负荷,而不会引起高度的疲劳感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potential Importance of Maximal Upper Body Strength-Generating Qualities and Upper Body Strength Training for Performance of High-Intensity Running and Jumping Actions: A Scoping Review. Advanced Footwear Technology in Non-Elite Runners: A Survey of Training Practices and Reported Outcomes. Individuality Affects the Efficiency of Basketball Pre-Game Warm-Up on Players' Performance. Occurrence of Injuries in Different Phases of Judo Matches: Analysis Based on International Competitions. Prevalence of Lower Back Pain and Risk Factors in Equestrians: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1