The Influence of Including Goalkeepers on the Intensity Demands of Walking Football Practice.

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.3390/sports12120346
Júlio A Costa, César André Coelho, António Ferraz, João Brito, José Guilherme, André Seabra, Bruno Travassos, Hugo Folgado, Bruno Gonçalves
{"title":"The Influence of Including Goalkeepers on the Intensity Demands of Walking Football Practice.","authors":"Júlio A Costa, César André Coelho, António Ferraz, João Brito, José Guilherme, André Seabra, Bruno Travassos, Hugo Folgado, Bruno Gonçalves","doi":"10.3390/sports12120346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This preliminary study examined the effects of playing walking football with and without a goalkeeper (GK) on physiological, physical, technical, and perceptual variables in older men. Twenty participants (67 ± 4.7 years) engaged in two five vs. five walking football sessions, one WITH-GK and one WITHOUT-GK, using a randomized crossover design. The heart rate (HR), distance covered, technical actions, perceived exercise intensity, and enjoyment were measured. The results showed a significantly higher average HR (131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, <i>p</i> < 0.001), %HRmax (79% vs. 74%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and time in higher HR zones (>80%HRmax, <i>p</i> < 0.05) in the WITH-GK condition. Participants also covered more total distance in the WITH-GK condition (1123 m vs. 1083 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001), particularly at speeds above 4 km/h (834 m vs. 781 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Conversely, more passes were made in the WITHOUT-GK condition (20 vs. 16 passes, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while the WITH-GK condition showed more shots (two vs. one, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The perceived exercise intensity was slightly higher in the WITHOUT-GK condition (five vs. four, <i>p</i> = 0.01), although the enjoyment levels were similar, with a slight preference for WITHOUT-GK. Overall, playing WITHOUT-GK provides a safer, lower-intensity alternative to WITH-GK, reducing the physical and perceived strain while maintaining enjoyment. This makes WITHOUT-GK particularly suitable for older adults or individuals with health conditions, promoting participation and rehabilitation with minimized risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12120346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This preliminary study examined the effects of playing walking football with and without a goalkeeper (GK) on physiological, physical, technical, and perceptual variables in older men. Twenty participants (67 ± 4.7 years) engaged in two five vs. five walking football sessions, one WITH-GK and one WITHOUT-GK, using a randomized crossover design. The heart rate (HR), distance covered, technical actions, perceived exercise intensity, and enjoyment were measured. The results showed a significantly higher average HR (131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, p < 0.001), %HRmax (79% vs. 74%, p < 0.001), and time in higher HR zones (>80%HRmax, p < 0.05) in the WITH-GK condition. Participants also covered more total distance in the WITH-GK condition (1123 m vs. 1083 m, p < 0.001), particularly at speeds above 4 km/h (834 m vs. 781 m, p < 0.001). Conversely, more passes were made in the WITHOUT-GK condition (20 vs. 16 passes, p < 0.001), while the WITH-GK condition showed more shots (two vs. one, p < 0.001). The perceived exercise intensity was slightly higher in the WITHOUT-GK condition (five vs. four, p = 0.01), although the enjoyment levels were similar, with a slight preference for WITHOUT-GK. Overall, playing WITHOUT-GK provides a safer, lower-intensity alternative to WITH-GK, reducing the physical and perceived strain while maintaining enjoyment. This makes WITHOUT-GK particularly suitable for older adults or individuals with health conditions, promoting participation and rehabilitation with minimized risks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引进守门员对步行足球训练强度需求的影响。
这项初步研究考察了在有守门员和没有守门员(GK)的情况下踢步行足球对老年男性的生理、身体、技术和感知变量的影响。20名参与者(67±4.7岁)采用随机交叉设计,进行了两次5 vs 5步行足球训练,一次使用gk,一次不使用gk。测量心率(HR)、覆盖距离、技术动作、感知运动强度和享受程度。结果显示,在WITH-GK条件下,平均心率(131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, p < 0.001)、%HRmax (79% vs. 74%, p < 0.001)和高心率区时间(bbb80 %HRmax, p < 0.05)显著增加。在WITH-GK条件下,参与者还跑了更多的总距离(1123米对1083米,p < 0.001),特别是在速度超过4公里/小时时(834米对781米,p < 0.001)。相反,在没有gk的情况下,传球次数更多(20次对16次,p < 0.001),而在有gk的情况下,传球次数更多(2次对1次,p < 0.001)。在没有gk的情况下,感知到的运动强度略高(5比4,p = 0.01),尽管享受水平相似,但没有gk的情况下略有偏好。总的来说,与WITH-GK相比,玩WITH-GK提供了一个更安全、更低强度的选择,在保持乐趣的同时减少了身体和感知的压力。这使得WITHOUT-GK特别适合老年人或有健康问题的个人,以最小的风险促进参与和康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potential Importance of Maximal Upper Body Strength-Generating Qualities and Upper Body Strength Training for Performance of High-Intensity Running and Jumping Actions: A Scoping Review. Advanced Footwear Technology in Non-Elite Runners: A Survey of Training Practices and Reported Outcomes. Individuality Affects the Efficiency of Basketball Pre-Game Warm-Up on Players' Performance. Occurrence of Injuries in Different Phases of Judo Matches: Analysis Based on International Competitions. Prevalence of Lower Back Pain and Risk Factors in Equestrians: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1