The Influence of Including Goalkeepers on the Intensity Demands of Walking Football Practice.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.3390/sports12120346
Júlio A Costa, César André Coelho, António Ferraz, João Brito, José Guilherme, André Seabra, Bruno Travassos, Hugo Folgado, Bruno Gonçalves
{"title":"The Influence of Including Goalkeepers on the Intensity Demands of Walking Football Practice.","authors":"Júlio A Costa, César André Coelho, António Ferraz, João Brito, José Guilherme, André Seabra, Bruno Travassos, Hugo Folgado, Bruno Gonçalves","doi":"10.3390/sports12120346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This preliminary study examined the effects of playing walking football with and without a goalkeeper (GK) on physiological, physical, technical, and perceptual variables in older men. Twenty participants (67 ± 4.7 years) engaged in two five vs. five walking football sessions, one WITH-GK and one WITHOUT-GK, using a randomized crossover design. The heart rate (HR), distance covered, technical actions, perceived exercise intensity, and enjoyment were measured. The results showed a significantly higher average HR (131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, <i>p</i> < 0.001), %HRmax (79% vs. 74%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and time in higher HR zones (>80%HRmax, <i>p</i> < 0.05) in the WITH-GK condition. Participants also covered more total distance in the WITH-GK condition (1123 m vs. 1083 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001), particularly at speeds above 4 km/h (834 m vs. 781 m, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Conversely, more passes were made in the WITHOUT-GK condition (20 vs. 16 passes, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while the WITH-GK condition showed more shots (two vs. one, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The perceived exercise intensity was slightly higher in the WITHOUT-GK condition (five vs. four, <i>p</i> = 0.01), although the enjoyment levels were similar, with a slight preference for WITHOUT-GK. Overall, playing WITHOUT-GK provides a safer, lower-intensity alternative to WITH-GK, reducing the physical and perceived strain while maintaining enjoyment. This makes WITHOUT-GK particularly suitable for older adults or individuals with health conditions, promoting participation and rehabilitation with minimized risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12120346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This preliminary study examined the effects of playing walking football with and without a goalkeeper (GK) on physiological, physical, technical, and perceptual variables in older men. Twenty participants (67 ± 4.7 years) engaged in two five vs. five walking football sessions, one WITH-GK and one WITHOUT-GK, using a randomized crossover design. The heart rate (HR), distance covered, technical actions, perceived exercise intensity, and enjoyment were measured. The results showed a significantly higher average HR (131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, p < 0.001), %HRmax (79% vs. 74%, p < 0.001), and time in higher HR zones (>80%HRmax, p < 0.05) in the WITH-GK condition. Participants also covered more total distance in the WITH-GK condition (1123 m vs. 1083 m, p < 0.001), particularly at speeds above 4 km/h (834 m vs. 781 m, p < 0.001). Conversely, more passes were made in the WITHOUT-GK condition (20 vs. 16 passes, p < 0.001), while the WITH-GK condition showed more shots (two vs. one, p < 0.001). The perceived exercise intensity was slightly higher in the WITHOUT-GK condition (five vs. four, p = 0.01), although the enjoyment levels were similar, with a slight preference for WITHOUT-GK. Overall, playing WITHOUT-GK provides a safer, lower-intensity alternative to WITH-GK, reducing the physical and perceived strain while maintaining enjoyment. This makes WITHOUT-GK particularly suitable for older adults or individuals with health conditions, promoting participation and rehabilitation with minimized risks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引进守门员对步行足球训练强度需求的影响。
这项初步研究考察了在有守门员和没有守门员(GK)的情况下踢步行足球对老年男性的生理、身体、技术和感知变量的影响。20名参与者(67±4.7岁)采用随机交叉设计,进行了两次5 vs 5步行足球训练,一次使用gk,一次不使用gk。测量心率(HR)、覆盖距离、技术动作、感知运动强度和享受程度。结果显示,在WITH-GK条件下,平均心率(131 bpm vs. 123 bpm, p < 0.001)、%HRmax (79% vs. 74%, p < 0.001)和高心率区时间(bbb80 %HRmax, p < 0.05)显著增加。在WITH-GK条件下,参与者还跑了更多的总距离(1123米对1083米,p < 0.001),特别是在速度超过4公里/小时时(834米对781米,p < 0.001)。相反,在没有gk的情况下,传球次数更多(20次对16次,p < 0.001),而在有gk的情况下,传球次数更多(2次对1次,p < 0.001)。在没有gk的情况下,感知到的运动强度略高(5比4,p = 0.01),尽管享受水平相似,但没有gk的情况下略有偏好。总的来说,与WITH-GK相比,玩WITH-GK提供了一个更安全、更低强度的选择,在保持乐趣的同时减少了身体和感知的压力。这使得WITHOUT-GK特别适合老年人或有健康问题的个人,以最小的风险促进参与和康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Between-Session Reliability of Portable Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull and Countermovement Jump Tests in Elite Male Ice Hockey Players from the Swedish Hockey League. "All Hands on Deck": A Systematic Review of Concussion Guidelines Across All Sailing Sports and a Call to Action. Differential Balance Enhancements Associated with Conventional Balance Training and Portable Slackline Board Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Yoga for Neurodegenerative Disorders: Therapeutic Effects, Mechanisms, and Applications in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease. Competition Stress Prolongs Exercise Recovery in Female Division I Collegiate Soccer Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1