Comparison of Vertical Jump Force-Time Metrics Between ACL-Injured and Healthy Semi-Professional Male and Female Soccer Players.

IF 2.2 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.3390/sports12120339
Dimitrije Cabarkapa, Damjana V Cabarkapa, Andrew C Fry, Yu Song, Thordis Gisladottir, Milos Petrovic
{"title":"Comparison of Vertical Jump Force-Time Metrics Between ACL-Injured and Healthy Semi-Professional Male and Female Soccer Players.","authors":"Dimitrije Cabarkapa, Damjana V Cabarkapa, Andrew C Fry, Yu Song, Thordis Gisladottir, Milos Petrovic","doi":"10.3390/sports12120339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the increasing use of innovative force plate systems in applied sports settings and the impact that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have on team success, the purpose of the present study was to compare the lower-body neuromuscular performance characteristics of athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and their non-injured counterparts (i.e., healthy controls). Forty-five male (thirteen injured) and twenty-six female (ten injured) semi-professional soccer players volunteered to participate in the present study. Each athlete performed three countermovement vertical jumps (CMJs) while standing on a uniaxial force plate system sampling at 1000 Hz. The injured athletes completed a nine-month recovery protocol and were screened 11-13 months post-ACLR. The dependent variables included the force-time metrics within both the eccentric and concentric phases of the CMJ. Independent <i>t</i>-tests or Mann-Whitney U-test were used to examine statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) differences in each variable (i.e., ACL-injured vs. healthy controls). The results revealed no significant between-group differences in any CMJ force-time metrics of interest (e.g., concentric peak force, eccentric mean power, countermovement depth) between ACL-injured and non-injured athletes, including inter-limb asymmetry measures (i.e., peak takeoff and landing force). Besides implying the effectiveness of the implemented rehabilitation protocol, these findings suggest that the CMJ may not present a sufficient neuromuscular performance stimulus needed to expose lower-limb asymmetries and strength and power deficiencies 11-13 months post-ACLR.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11679240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12120339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the increasing use of innovative force plate systems in applied sports settings and the impact that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have on team success, the purpose of the present study was to compare the lower-body neuromuscular performance characteristics of athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and their non-injured counterparts (i.e., healthy controls). Forty-five male (thirteen injured) and twenty-six female (ten injured) semi-professional soccer players volunteered to participate in the present study. Each athlete performed three countermovement vertical jumps (CMJs) while standing on a uniaxial force plate system sampling at 1000 Hz. The injured athletes completed a nine-month recovery protocol and were screened 11-13 months post-ACLR. The dependent variables included the force-time metrics within both the eccentric and concentric phases of the CMJ. Independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-test were used to examine statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in each variable (i.e., ACL-injured vs. healthy controls). The results revealed no significant between-group differences in any CMJ force-time metrics of interest (e.g., concentric peak force, eccentric mean power, countermovement depth) between ACL-injured and non-injured athletes, including inter-limb asymmetry measures (i.e., peak takeoff and landing force). Besides implying the effectiveness of the implemented rehabilitation protocol, these findings suggest that the CMJ may not present a sufficient neuromuscular performance stimulus needed to expose lower-limb asymmetries and strength and power deficiencies 11-13 months post-ACLR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
半职业男女足球运动员acl损伤与健康运动员垂直起跳力-时间指标的比较。
鉴于在应用运动环境中越来越多地使用创新的力板系统,以及前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤对团队成功的影响,本研究的目的是比较接受ACL重建(ACLR)的运动员和未受伤的运动员(即健康对照组)的下体神经肌肉表现特征。45名男性(13名受伤)和26名女性(10名受伤)半职业足球运动员自愿参加本研究。每位运动员站在单轴力板系统上,以1000 Hz的频率采样,进行三次反向垂直跳跃。受伤的运动员完成了9个月的恢复方案,并在aclr后11-13个月进行了筛查。因变量包括CMJ偏心和同心阶段的力-时间指标。采用独立t检验或Mann-Whitney u检验检验各变量(即acl损伤组与健康对照组)的统计学差异(p < 0.05)。结果显示,acl损伤和非损伤运动员的CMJ力-时间指标(如同心峰值力、偏心平均力量、反运动深度)在组间无显著差异,包括肢间不对称测量(即峰值起落力)。除了暗示实施的康复方案的有效性外,这些研究结果表明,在aclr后11-13个月,CMJ可能没有提供足够的神经肌肉表现刺激来暴露下肢不对称和力量和力量不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Potential Importance of Maximal Upper Body Strength-Generating Qualities and Upper Body Strength Training for Performance of High-Intensity Running and Jumping Actions: A Scoping Review. Advanced Footwear Technology in Non-Elite Runners: A Survey of Training Practices and Reported Outcomes. Individuality Affects the Efficiency of Basketball Pre-Game Warm-Up on Players' Performance. Occurrence of Injuries in Different Phases of Judo Matches: Analysis Based on International Competitions. Prevalence of Lower Back Pain and Risk Factors in Equestrians: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1