Bereavement, prolonged grief, and the prevention of alcohol misuse

IF 2.7 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.) Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1111/acer.15524
Jeremy W. Luk
{"title":"Bereavement, prolonged grief, and the prevention of alcohol misuse","authors":"Jeremy W. Luk","doi":"10.1111/acer.15524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In their recent article, Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) examined the prevalence and correlates of current problematic alcohol use among 1529 adults who ever experienced the death of a significant other in their lifetime. Leveraging data from a national sample, the authors found that 30.3% of bereaved adults were screened positive for problematic alcohol use, which was assessed using the AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption) as a proxy measure. The authors suggested that this prevalence estimate was higher than rates of current binge and heavy drinking in the general US population, which underscores the possibility that the death of a significant other can be a precipitating factor for problematic alcohol use among bereaved individuals. The authors further reported that a shorter time since the death of the significant other, meeting presumptive criteria for major depressive disorder, and meeting presumptive criteria for prolonged grief disorder were independently associated with higher odds of problematic alcohol use. Besides the large sample size, the thorough consideration of bereavement-related factors (e.g., kinship category of decedent and cause of death) and multiple psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and prolonged grief disorder) is of substantial merit as it helps identify features and correlates of problematic alcohol use among bereaved adults that can be used to inform prevention and intervention strategies.</p><p>The findings reported by Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) are of relevance to clinical practice, though as an empirical paper, the authors did not provide detailed information about the diagnosis and treatment of prolonged grief disorder—a topic that may be of interest to the readers of <i>Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research</i>. The goal of this commentary is to elaborate on these points and is organized into three sections. First, I describe the scope of the problem and draw attention to the recent official recognition of prolonged grief disorder as a distinct diagnosis. Second, I discuss the clinical implications of findings reported by Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) and emphasize the importance of well-timed and evidence-based treatment for prolonged grief disorder, noting that not all types of mental health services are equally efficacious. Third, I offer ideas to promote the integration of evidence-based grief-focused psychotherapy with addiction treatment and highlight the need for future research to examine bereavement and alcohol misuse in underserved populations.</p><p>Bereavement is a near universal human experience that most individuals would encounter at some point in their lives. The loss of a loved one can be profoundly distressing and emotionally painful, and experiencing yearning for the lost loved one along with sadness and grief in the acute phase after a loss is often considered a part of normative bereavement reactions (Jordan &amp; Litz, <span>2014</span>). While these bereavement reactions typically decrease in intensity over time for most individuals, about 1 in 10 bereaved adults would experience prolonged grief that remains persistent, debilitating, and impairing to everyday functioning despite the passage of time (Lundorff et al., <span>2017</span>). Among individuals who experienced bereavement following unnatural or traumatic losses (e.g., accidents, disasters, suicides, and homicides), the prevalence of prolonged grief disorder was estimated to be even higher at 49% (Djelantik et al., <span>2020</span>). These findings suggest that prolonged grief in the context of bereavement is quite common and can be conceptualized as a significant life stressor that increases the risk of alcohol misuse as a maladaptive coping mechanism (Geda et al., <span>2024</span>).</p><p>In the latest versions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; 11th Revision) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR; Fifth Edition, Text Revision), prolonged grief disorder has been officially recognized as a diagnosable condition (Szuhany et al., <span>2021</span>; Zachar et al., <span>2023</span>). This new condition can be defined as “a post-loss stress syndrome in which grief after a death remains intense and preoccupying longer than expected according to social, cultural, or religious norms” (p. 1228), with the duration of clinically distressing and impairing symptoms among adults lasting for at least 6 months (ICD-11) or 12 months (DSM-5-TR) (Simon &amp; Shear, <span>2024</span>). It has been proposed that the formal recognition of prolonged grief disorder as a distinct diagnosis can help identify individuals with maladaptive grief responses and help link them to appropriate resources and evidence-based treatments (Prigerson et al., <span>2022</span>). Despite these recent developments, limited prior research has examined whether rates of problematic alcohol use are higher among bereaved adults and whether prolonged grief disorder is associated with higher problematic alcohol use in this population. Addressing this gap, Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) found that problematic alcohol use is common among bereaved adults and that prolonged grief disorder is a distinct risk factor associated with problematic alcohol use.</p><p>The identification of bereavement as a window of risk for the development of problematic alcohol use may create an opportunity for well-timed prevention efforts following the loss of a loved one. This idea would be consistent with the finding from Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) where individuals who experienced the loss of a significant other within the past year had the highest rate of problematic alcohol use. A major challenge in the alcohol field is the underutilization of alcohol use disorder treatment that is partly attributable to barriers such as low perceived need for care, stigma, and low perceived usefulness of available treatments (Venegas et al., <span>2021</span>). The provision of treatment that integrates grief-focused psychotherapy with alcohol prevention may help address these barriers. First, facing the loss of a significant other may increase perceived need for care in the context of an external stressor rather than a “personal failure” (Keyes et al., <span>2010</span>). Second, since bereavement is a near universal experience, individuals may be more open to getting help without feeling judged or held responsible for their condition (Kilian et al., <span>2021</span>). Third, offering grief-specific support during bereavement may be seen as more relevant and useful for individuals at risk for alcohol misuse and has the potential to increase treatment utilization rates. Regarding this last point, it is notable that over half of the bereaved adults who misused alcohol in the study by Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) utilized some form of mental health services (52.7%), a utilization rate that is substantially higher than in the general population for alcohol-specific treatment services among those with alcohol use disorder in the past year (7.3%) (Han et al., <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) further provided a breakdown of the type of mental health services utilized, including individual counseling, family counseling, religion-based mental health counseling, group counseling, medication assistance, and inpatient mental health services. While informative, this categorization of mental health services did not specify whether evidence-based approaches were used and whether the services were provided by professionally trained clinicians or facilitators. This is an area that warrants future research. Related to the issue of categorizing treatment types, it is possible that the treatment utilization rates in Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) appeared higher than other population-based estimates due to the more inclusive nature of these categories (e.g., religion-based mental health counseling may not have been included in other studies). A standardized approach to categorize mental health services and alcohol/substance use treatment modalities may help resolve these inconsistencies and facilitate more meaningful comparisons of treatment utilization rates across various studies.</p><p>The delineation of treatment modalities is important because different types of mental health services are not equally efficacious. Current evidence suggests that grief-focused cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) have the strongest empirical support, whereas bereavement support groups and brief contact interventions have limited support despite that they are commonly used (LaPlante et al., <span>2024</span>). Core components of grief-focused CBT typically include (1) establishing the lay of the land through psychoeducation, (2) promoting self-regulation through reappraisal of troubling thoughts and beliefs, (3) building meaningful connections to share pain and let others help, (4) setting aspirational goals that can lead to positive emotions and a sense of purpose, (5) revisiting the world through exposure to previously avoided situations, (6) creating an acceptable account of the story of the death, and (7) reviewing positive and negative memories of the deceased (Shear, <span>2015</span>). While CBT approaches to address comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder are available and have been empirically evaluated (Kline et al., <span>2023</span>), a more focused approach to integrate alcohol prevention with grief-focused CBT for prolonged grief disorder has not yet been developed and tested. The need for such an integrated approach is highlighted in the analyses by Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>) which showed that presumptive prolonged grief disorder, but not presumptive posttraumatic stress disorder, was uniquely associated with higher odds of current problematic alcohol use among bereaved adults.</p><p>In a recent conceptual synthesis, Luk and Thompson (<span>2024</span>) proposed an integrated framework to map dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills to clinical domains implicated in contemporary addiction research so that clinicians can effectively prioritize DBT skills to inform treatment of alcohol use disorder. These clinical domains include three addictions neuroclinical assessment domains (i.e., executive function, incentive salience, and negative emotionality) and multiple quality of life domains. As an evidence-based “third wave” behavioral therapy, the skills training component of DBT incorporates components of motivational interviewing (e.g., Pros and Cons) and traditional cognitive behavior therapy (e.g., challenging thoughts captured as part of the Check the Facts skill and behavioral activation captured as part of the Opposite Action skill), but substantially expanded the list of skills to include Dialectical Abstinence, mindfulness techniques, and acceptance strategies. The broad range of cognitive behavioral skills available within DBT makes it an attractive option to address the complexity of comorbid prolonged grief disorder and alcohol use disorder. For instance, due to the unchangeable nature of death, DBT's Radical Acceptance skill may be well suited to help bereaved adults increase acceptance of the loss of life in a more total and complete way, thereby reducing suffering and increasing adaptive functioning. Recognizing the importance of biopsychosocial functioning and wellbeing in recovery from alcohol use disorder (Hagman et al., <span>2022</span>), DBT's ABC PLEASE skill can be tailored to address quality of life issues that bereaved individuals may encounter. Specifically, <i>A</i>ccumulating positive emotions via increasing pleasurable events and valued aligned activities can increase psychological quality of life and social functioning. <i>B</i>uilding mastery can help individuals with a significant loss recover a sense of control over other domains of life. <i>C</i>oping ahead of time with difficult situations can help bereaved individuals create a plan to increase coping capacity when faced with situations that remind them of the deceased (e.g., certain places, the holiday season, or during the anniversary of the death of their loved one). Finally, the PLEASE skill encourages individuals to take care of their physical health via positive lifestyle changes (e.g., treating physical illness, balanced diet, adequate sleep, and getting exercise) to take care of their emotional health, which can be beneficial to increase physical quality of life among bereaved individuals as they reengage in the world. While clinical research is needed to establish the efficacy of this proposed approach for treating co-occurring prolonged grief disorder and alcohol use disorder, CBT trained clinicians who work with bereaved individuals at risk for alcohol misuse may utilize clinical judgment to incorporate some of these specific skills to enhance their practice with patients when deemed appropriate.</p><p>In terms of future direction, the examination of prolonged grief disorder and alcohol misuse in underserved populations, such as older adults and individuals with alcohol-associated liver disease, may be warranted. First, recent research has identified alcohol use and its adverse health effects among older adults as an area of increasing concern (White et al., <span>2023</span>). Although bereavement can affect individuals of all ages, its negative effects on physical and mental health may be especially challenging to manage and recover from among older adults who might be more socially isolated and/or experience chronic medical conditions. Thus, the effects of bereavement and prolonged grief on the risk of alcohol misuse among older adults may be an area of increased relevance and interest. Second, a recent study found that alcohol use disorder treatment was underutilized among patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis, with the past 12-month utilization rate of alcohol use disorder treatment estimated at 32% (Luk et al., <span>2024</span>). Individuals with alcohol-associated cirrhosis may experience greater medical and socioeconomic vulnerabilities that increase their risk for continued alcohol misuse. On top of these vulnerability factors, the loss of a loved one, especially if the cause of death is attributable to alcohol-associated diseases, may lead to questions about the prognosis of their own conditions and potential alcohol misuse as a maladaptive coping mechanism to manage stress and negative emotions. Extending the important work by Bottomley et al. (<span>2024</span>), more research on bereavement, prolonged grief, and alcohol misuse prevention among older adults and individuals with alcohol-associated liver disease is needed to better serve these underrepresented populations.</p><p>The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":"49 3","pages":"507-510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acer.15524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In their recent article, Bottomley et al. (2024) examined the prevalence and correlates of current problematic alcohol use among 1529 adults who ever experienced the death of a significant other in their lifetime. Leveraging data from a national sample, the authors found that 30.3% of bereaved adults were screened positive for problematic alcohol use, which was assessed using the AUDIT-C (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption) as a proxy measure. The authors suggested that this prevalence estimate was higher than rates of current binge and heavy drinking in the general US population, which underscores the possibility that the death of a significant other can be a precipitating factor for problematic alcohol use among bereaved individuals. The authors further reported that a shorter time since the death of the significant other, meeting presumptive criteria for major depressive disorder, and meeting presumptive criteria for prolonged grief disorder were independently associated with higher odds of problematic alcohol use. Besides the large sample size, the thorough consideration of bereavement-related factors (e.g., kinship category of decedent and cause of death) and multiple psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and prolonged grief disorder) is of substantial merit as it helps identify features and correlates of problematic alcohol use among bereaved adults that can be used to inform prevention and intervention strategies.

The findings reported by Bottomley et al. (2024) are of relevance to clinical practice, though as an empirical paper, the authors did not provide detailed information about the diagnosis and treatment of prolonged grief disorder—a topic that may be of interest to the readers of Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research. The goal of this commentary is to elaborate on these points and is organized into three sections. First, I describe the scope of the problem and draw attention to the recent official recognition of prolonged grief disorder as a distinct diagnosis. Second, I discuss the clinical implications of findings reported by Bottomley et al. (2024) and emphasize the importance of well-timed and evidence-based treatment for prolonged grief disorder, noting that not all types of mental health services are equally efficacious. Third, I offer ideas to promote the integration of evidence-based grief-focused psychotherapy with addiction treatment and highlight the need for future research to examine bereavement and alcohol misuse in underserved populations.

Bereavement is a near universal human experience that most individuals would encounter at some point in their lives. The loss of a loved one can be profoundly distressing and emotionally painful, and experiencing yearning for the lost loved one along with sadness and grief in the acute phase after a loss is often considered a part of normative bereavement reactions (Jordan & Litz, 2014). While these bereavement reactions typically decrease in intensity over time for most individuals, about 1 in 10 bereaved adults would experience prolonged grief that remains persistent, debilitating, and impairing to everyday functioning despite the passage of time (Lundorff et al., 2017). Among individuals who experienced bereavement following unnatural or traumatic losses (e.g., accidents, disasters, suicides, and homicides), the prevalence of prolonged grief disorder was estimated to be even higher at 49% (Djelantik et al., 2020). These findings suggest that prolonged grief in the context of bereavement is quite common and can be conceptualized as a significant life stressor that increases the risk of alcohol misuse as a maladaptive coping mechanism (Geda et al., 2024).

In the latest versions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11; 11th Revision) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR; Fifth Edition, Text Revision), prolonged grief disorder has been officially recognized as a diagnosable condition (Szuhany et al., 2021; Zachar et al., 2023). This new condition can be defined as “a post-loss stress syndrome in which grief after a death remains intense and preoccupying longer than expected according to social, cultural, or religious norms” (p. 1228), with the duration of clinically distressing and impairing symptoms among adults lasting for at least 6 months (ICD-11) or 12 months (DSM-5-TR) (Simon & Shear, 2024). It has been proposed that the formal recognition of prolonged grief disorder as a distinct diagnosis can help identify individuals with maladaptive grief responses and help link them to appropriate resources and evidence-based treatments (Prigerson et al., 2022). Despite these recent developments, limited prior research has examined whether rates of problematic alcohol use are higher among bereaved adults and whether prolonged grief disorder is associated with higher problematic alcohol use in this population. Addressing this gap, Bottomley et al. (2024) found that problematic alcohol use is common among bereaved adults and that prolonged grief disorder is a distinct risk factor associated with problematic alcohol use.

The identification of bereavement as a window of risk for the development of problematic alcohol use may create an opportunity for well-timed prevention efforts following the loss of a loved one. This idea would be consistent with the finding from Bottomley et al. (2024) where individuals who experienced the loss of a significant other within the past year had the highest rate of problematic alcohol use. A major challenge in the alcohol field is the underutilization of alcohol use disorder treatment that is partly attributable to barriers such as low perceived need for care, stigma, and low perceived usefulness of available treatments (Venegas et al., 2021). The provision of treatment that integrates grief-focused psychotherapy with alcohol prevention may help address these barriers. First, facing the loss of a significant other may increase perceived need for care in the context of an external stressor rather than a “personal failure” (Keyes et al., 2010). Second, since bereavement is a near universal experience, individuals may be more open to getting help without feeling judged or held responsible for their condition (Kilian et al., 2021). Third, offering grief-specific support during bereavement may be seen as more relevant and useful for individuals at risk for alcohol misuse and has the potential to increase treatment utilization rates. Regarding this last point, it is notable that over half of the bereaved adults who misused alcohol in the study by Bottomley et al. (2024) utilized some form of mental health services (52.7%), a utilization rate that is substantially higher than in the general population for alcohol-specific treatment services among those with alcohol use disorder in the past year (7.3%) (Han et al., 2021).

Bottomley et al. (2024) further provided a breakdown of the type of mental health services utilized, including individual counseling, family counseling, religion-based mental health counseling, group counseling, medication assistance, and inpatient mental health services. While informative, this categorization of mental health services did not specify whether evidence-based approaches were used and whether the services were provided by professionally trained clinicians or facilitators. This is an area that warrants future research. Related to the issue of categorizing treatment types, it is possible that the treatment utilization rates in Bottomley et al. (2024) appeared higher than other population-based estimates due to the more inclusive nature of these categories (e.g., religion-based mental health counseling may not have been included in other studies). A standardized approach to categorize mental health services and alcohol/substance use treatment modalities may help resolve these inconsistencies and facilitate more meaningful comparisons of treatment utilization rates across various studies.

The delineation of treatment modalities is important because different types of mental health services are not equally efficacious. Current evidence suggests that grief-focused cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) have the strongest empirical support, whereas bereavement support groups and brief contact interventions have limited support despite that they are commonly used (LaPlante et al., 2024). Core components of grief-focused CBT typically include (1) establishing the lay of the land through psychoeducation, (2) promoting self-regulation through reappraisal of troubling thoughts and beliefs, (3) building meaningful connections to share pain and let others help, (4) setting aspirational goals that can lead to positive emotions and a sense of purpose, (5) revisiting the world through exposure to previously avoided situations, (6) creating an acceptable account of the story of the death, and (7) reviewing positive and negative memories of the deceased (Shear, 2015). While CBT approaches to address comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder are available and have been empirically evaluated (Kline et al., 2023), a more focused approach to integrate alcohol prevention with grief-focused CBT for prolonged grief disorder has not yet been developed and tested. The need for such an integrated approach is highlighted in the analyses by Bottomley et al. (2024) which showed that presumptive prolonged grief disorder, but not presumptive posttraumatic stress disorder, was uniquely associated with higher odds of current problematic alcohol use among bereaved adults.

In a recent conceptual synthesis, Luk and Thompson (2024) proposed an integrated framework to map dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills to clinical domains implicated in contemporary addiction research so that clinicians can effectively prioritize DBT skills to inform treatment of alcohol use disorder. These clinical domains include three addictions neuroclinical assessment domains (i.e., executive function, incentive salience, and negative emotionality) and multiple quality of life domains. As an evidence-based “third wave” behavioral therapy, the skills training component of DBT incorporates components of motivational interviewing (e.g., Pros and Cons) and traditional cognitive behavior therapy (e.g., challenging thoughts captured as part of the Check the Facts skill and behavioral activation captured as part of the Opposite Action skill), but substantially expanded the list of skills to include Dialectical Abstinence, mindfulness techniques, and acceptance strategies. The broad range of cognitive behavioral skills available within DBT makes it an attractive option to address the complexity of comorbid prolonged grief disorder and alcohol use disorder. For instance, due to the unchangeable nature of death, DBT's Radical Acceptance skill may be well suited to help bereaved adults increase acceptance of the loss of life in a more total and complete way, thereby reducing suffering and increasing adaptive functioning. Recognizing the importance of biopsychosocial functioning and wellbeing in recovery from alcohol use disorder (Hagman et al., 2022), DBT's ABC PLEASE skill can be tailored to address quality of life issues that bereaved individuals may encounter. Specifically, Accumulating positive emotions via increasing pleasurable events and valued aligned activities can increase psychological quality of life and social functioning. Building mastery can help individuals with a significant loss recover a sense of control over other domains of life. Coping ahead of time with difficult situations can help bereaved individuals create a plan to increase coping capacity when faced with situations that remind them of the deceased (e.g., certain places, the holiday season, or during the anniversary of the death of their loved one). Finally, the PLEASE skill encourages individuals to take care of their physical health via positive lifestyle changes (e.g., treating physical illness, balanced diet, adequate sleep, and getting exercise) to take care of their emotional health, which can be beneficial to increase physical quality of life among bereaved individuals as they reengage in the world. While clinical research is needed to establish the efficacy of this proposed approach for treating co-occurring prolonged grief disorder and alcohol use disorder, CBT trained clinicians who work with bereaved individuals at risk for alcohol misuse may utilize clinical judgment to incorporate some of these specific skills to enhance their practice with patients when deemed appropriate.

In terms of future direction, the examination of prolonged grief disorder and alcohol misuse in underserved populations, such as older adults and individuals with alcohol-associated liver disease, may be warranted. First, recent research has identified alcohol use and its adverse health effects among older adults as an area of increasing concern (White et al., 2023). Although bereavement can affect individuals of all ages, its negative effects on physical and mental health may be especially challenging to manage and recover from among older adults who might be more socially isolated and/or experience chronic medical conditions. Thus, the effects of bereavement and prolonged grief on the risk of alcohol misuse among older adults may be an area of increased relevance and interest. Second, a recent study found that alcohol use disorder treatment was underutilized among patients with alcohol-associated cirrhosis, with the past 12-month utilization rate of alcohol use disorder treatment estimated at 32% (Luk et al., 2024). Individuals with alcohol-associated cirrhosis may experience greater medical and socioeconomic vulnerabilities that increase their risk for continued alcohol misuse. On top of these vulnerability factors, the loss of a loved one, especially if the cause of death is attributable to alcohol-associated diseases, may lead to questions about the prognosis of their own conditions and potential alcohol misuse as a maladaptive coping mechanism to manage stress and negative emotions. Extending the important work by Bottomley et al. (2024), more research on bereavement, prolonged grief, and alcohol misuse prevention among older adults and individuals with alcohol-associated liver disease is needed to better serve these underrepresented populations.

The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丧亲之痛,长时间的悲伤,以及防止滥用酒精。
在他们最近的一篇文章中,Bottomley等人(2024)调查了1529名在一生中经历过重要伴侣死亡的成年人中当前问题酒精使用的患病率及其相关性。利用来自全国样本的数据,作者发现30.3%的失去亲人的成年人在有问题的酒精使用方面筛查呈阳性,这是使用AUDIT-C(酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费)作为代理措施进行评估的。作者认为,这一患病率估计高于目前美国普通人群中暴饮和重度饮酒的比率,这强调了一个重要的另一半的死亡可能是丧失亲人的人酗酒的一个诱发因素。作者进一步报道,在重要的另一半去世后较短的时间内,满足重度抑郁症的推定标准,以及满足长期悲伤障碍的推定标准,与问题性酒精使用的可能性较高独立相关。除了大样本量之外,全面考虑丧亲相关因素(例如,死者的亲属类别和死亡原因)和多种精神疾病(例如,抑郁症,创伤后应激障碍和长期悲伤障碍)具有重大价值,因为它有助于确定丧亲成人中问题酒精使用的特征和相关性,可用于告知预防和干预策略。Bottomley等人(2024)报告的研究结果与临床实践相关,尽管作为一篇实证论文,作者没有提供关于长期悲伤障碍的诊断和治疗的详细信息——这可能是《酒精:临床和实验研究》的读者感兴趣的话题。这篇评论的目的是详细阐述这些观点,并分为三个部分。首先,我描述了这个问题的范围,并提请注意最近官方承认长期悲伤障碍是一种独特的诊断。其次,我讨论了Bottomley等人(2024)报告的研究结果的临床意义,并强调了对长期悲伤障碍进行及时和循证治疗的重要性,并指出并非所有类型的心理健康服务都同样有效。第三,我提出了一些想法,以促进以证据为基础的以悲伤为中心的心理治疗与成瘾治疗的整合,并强调未来研究的必要性,以检查缺乏服务人群的丧亲之痛和酒精滥用。丧亲之痛几乎是一种普遍的人类经历,大多数人在生活中的某个时刻都会遇到。失去所爱的人是非常痛苦和痛苦的,经历对失去所爱的人的渴望以及在失去亲人后的急性阶段的悲伤和悲伤通常被认为是正常的丧亲反应的一部分(Jordan & &;绞合线,2014)。虽然对大多数人来说,这些丧亲反应的强度通常会随着时间的推移而减弱,但大约十分之一的丧亲成年人会经历长期的悲伤,尽管时间的推移,这种悲伤仍然持续存在,使人虚弱,并损害日常功能(Lundorff et al., 2017)。在经历了非自然或创伤性损失(例如事故、灾难、自杀和他杀)后的丧亲之痛的个体中,据估计,长期悲伤障碍的患病率甚至更高,为49% (Djelantik等人,2020)。这些发现表明,在丧恸的背景下,长期的悲伤是相当普遍的,可以被定义为一个重要的生活压力源,增加了酒精滥用的风险,作为一种适应不良的应对机制(Geda等人,2024)。在最新版本的《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11;《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-5-TR;第五版,文本修订),延长悲伤障碍已被正式认定为一种可诊断的疾病(Szuhany等人,2021;Zachar et al., 2023)。这种新情况可以被定义为“一种丧失后压力综合症,在这种情况下,死亡后的悲伤持续强烈,占据的时间比社会、文化或宗教规范所预期的要长”(第1228页),在成人中,临床痛苦和损害症状的持续时间至少为6个月(ICD-11)或12个月(DSM-5-TR) (Simon &amp;剪切,2024)。有人提出,正式承认长期悲伤障碍作为一种独特的诊断可以帮助识别患有不适应悲伤反应的个体,并帮助他们找到适当的资源和基于证据的治疗方法(Prigerson et al., 2022)。尽管最近有了这些进展,但有限的先前研究已经调查了在失去亲人的成年人中,问题酒精使用的比率是否更高,以及在这一人群中,长期的悲伤障碍是否与更高的问题酒精使用有关。 为了弥补这一差距,Bottomley等人(2024)发现,有问题的酒精使用在失去亲人的成年人中很常见,而长期的悲伤障碍是与有问题的酒精使用相关的一个明显的风险因素。将丧亲之痛确定为有问题的酒精使用发展的风险窗口,可能为在失去亲人后及时采取预防措施创造机会。这一观点与Bottomley等人(2024)的发现是一致的,即在过去一年内失去重要伴侣的人饮酒问题的比例最高。酒精领域的一个主要挑战是酒精使用障碍治疗的利用不足,部分原因是诸如认为护理需求低、污名化和认为现有治疗方法有用性低等障碍(Venegas等人,2021年)。提供以悲伤为重点的心理治疗与酒精预防相结合的治疗可能有助于解决这些障碍。首先,面对一个重要的人的损失可能会增加在外部压力源而不是“个人失败”的背景下对护理的感知需求(Keyes等人,2010)。其次,由于丧亲之痛几乎是一种普遍的经历,个人可能更愿意寻求帮助,而不会感到被评判或对自己的状况负责(Kilian et al., 2021)。第三,在丧亲期间提供特定悲伤的支持可能被视为对有酒精滥用风险的个人更相关和有用,并有可能提高治疗利用率。关于最后一点,值得注意的是,在Bottomley等人(2024)的研究中,一半以上滥用酒精的丧失亲人的成年人利用了某种形式的心理健康服务(52.7%),这一利用率大大高于过去一年酒精使用障碍患者中酒精特定治疗服务的一般人群(7.3%)(Han等人,2021)。Bottomley等人(2024)进一步提供了所利用的心理健康服务类型的细分,包括个人咨询、家庭咨询、基于宗教的心理健康咨询、团体咨询、药物援助和住院心理健康服务。这种精神卫生服务分类虽然提供了信息,但没有具体说明是否采用了基于证据的方法,以及这些服务是否由受过专业培训的临床医生或辅导员提供。这是一个值得进一步研究的领域。与分类治疗类型相关的问题是,Bottomley等人(2024)的治疗利用率可能高于其他基于人群的估计,因为这些类别更具包容性(例如,基于宗教的心理健康咨询可能未包括在其他研究中)。对精神卫生服务和酒精/物质使用治疗方式进行分类的标准化方法可能有助于解决这些不一致之处,并促进对各种研究的治疗利用率进行更有意义的比较。界定治疗方式很重要,因为不同类型的精神卫生服务并不同样有效。目前的证据表明,以悲伤为中心的认知行为疗法(CBT)具有最强的经验支持,而丧亲支持小组和短暂接触干预措施的支持有限,尽管它们被广泛使用(LaPlante等人,2024)。以悲伤为中心的CBT的核心组成部分通常包括:(1)通过心理教育建立基础;(2)通过重新评估令人不安的想法和信念来促进自我调节;(3)建立有意义的联系来分担痛苦并让他人提供帮助;(4)设定可以导致积极情绪和目的感的理想目标;(5)通过暴露于以前避免的情况来重新审视世界。(6)创造一个可接受的死亡故事,(7)回顾死者的积极和消极记忆(Shear, 2015)。虽然治疗共病性创伤后应激障碍和物质使用障碍的CBT方法是可用的,并且已经进行了经验评估(Kline等人,2023),但将酒精预防与以悲伤为中心的CBT结合起来治疗长期悲伤障碍的更有针对性的方法尚未开发和测试。Bottomley等人(2024)的分析强调了这种综合方法的必要性,该分析表明,在失去亲人的成年人中,推定的长期悲伤障碍(而不是推定的创伤后应激障碍)与当前有问题的酒精使用的可能性较高有关。在最近的概念综合中,Luk和Thompson(2024)提出了一个综合框架,将辩证行为疗法(DBT)技能映射到当代成瘾研究中涉及的临床领域,以便临床医生能够有效地优先考虑DBT技能,以指导酒精使用障碍的治疗。 这些临床领域包括三个成瘾神经临床评估领域(即,执行功能,激励显著性和消极情绪)和多个生活质量领域。作为一种基于证据的“第三波”行为疗法,DBT的技能训练部分结合了动机性访谈(例如,赞成和反对)和传统认知行为疗法(例如,挑战作为核查事实技能一部分的想法和作为相反行动技能一部分的行为激活)的组成部分,但实质上扩展了技能列表,包括辩证禁欲,正念技术和接受策略。DBT中广泛的认知行为技能使其成为解决长期悲伤障碍和酒精使用障碍共病复杂性的一个有吸引力的选择。例如,由于死亡的不可改变性,DBT的彻底接受技能可能非常适合帮助失去亲人的成年人以更全面和完整的方式增加对失去生命的接受,从而减少痛苦并增加适应功能。认识到生物心理社会功能和健康在酒精使用障碍恢复中的重要性(Hagman等人,2022),DBT的ABC PLEASE技能可以量身定制,以解决丧亲者可能遇到的生活质量问题。具体来说,通过增加愉快的事件和有价值的活动来积累积极的情绪可以提高心理生活质量和社会功能。建立掌握可以帮助那些有重大损失的人恢复对生活其他领域的控制感。提前应对困难的情况可以帮助失去亲人的人制定一个计划,在面对让他们想起死者的情况时增加应对能力(例如,某些地方,假日季节,或在他们所爱的人死亡的周年纪念日期间)。最后,“请”技能鼓励人们通过积极的生活方式改变来照顾自己的身体健康(例如,治疗身体疾病,均衡饮食,充足的睡眠和锻炼)来照顾自己的情绪健康,这有助于提高失去亲人的人在重新融入世界时的身体生活质量。虽然还需要临床研究来确定这种方法在治疗同时发生的长期悲伤障碍和酒精使用障碍方面的有效性,但接受过CBT培训的临床医生在治疗有酒精滥用风险的丧恸者时,可以利用临床判断,将这些特定技能纳入其中,以在适当的时候加强他们对患者的治疗。就未来的方向而言,可能需要在服务不足的人群(如老年人和酒精相关肝病患者)中对长期悲伤障碍和酒精滥用进行检查。首先,最近的研究已经确定,老年人饮酒及其对健康的不利影响是一个日益受到关注的领域(White等人,2023)。虽然丧亲之痛可以影响所有年龄段的人,但其对身心健康的负面影响可能尤其难以管理和恢复,因为老年人可能在社会上更加孤立和/或患有慢性疾病。因此,丧亲之痛和长期悲伤对老年人酒精滥用风险的影响可能是一个日益相关和感兴趣的领域。其次,最近的一项研究发现,酒精相关性肝硬化患者未充分利用酒精使用障碍治疗,过去12个月酒精使用障碍治疗的使用率估计为32% (Luk et al., 2024)。酒精相关性肝硬化患者可能会经历更大的医疗和社会经济脆弱性,这增加了他们继续滥用酒精的风险。在这些脆弱因素之上,失去亲人,特别是如果死亡原因可归因于酒精相关疾病,可能会导致人们对自己病情的预后产生疑问,并可能滥用酒精作为一种适应不良的应对机制来管理压力和负面情绪。延伸Bottomley等人(2024)的重要工作,需要在老年人和酒精相关肝病患者中进行更多关于丧恸、长期悲伤和酒精滥用预防的研究,以更好地为这些代表性不足的人群服务。作者没有需要披露的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Procedural separation of appetitive and consummatory behaviors in operant ethanol self-administration: A review and open-source analytical framework Lipopolysaccharide and imiquimod stimulation of potential immune biomarkers in whole blood predict alcohol use disorder risk based on AUDIT scores Individual differences in resilience to alcohol advertising: Two processing biases during advert viewing predict interindividual variation in postviewing craving and consumption Self-help group participation, avoidance of nonalcoholic beer, and nonsmoking independently predict better drinking outcomes in Japanese alcohol-dependent men An examination of child outcomes and predictors of severity when prenatal alcohol exposure is frequent and heavy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1