Immediate Effects of Distinct Intensities of Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation on Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY NeuroSci Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.3390/neurosci5040043
Kariny Realino do Rosário Ferreira, Maria de Cássia Souza Macedo, Ana Luiza Guimarães Alves, Arthur Ferreira Esquírio, Bianca Rossi Botim, Gabrielly Souza Jacob, Mayra Evelise Cunha Dos Santos, Gabriela Lopes Gama, Michelle Cristina Sales Almeida Barbosa, Alexandre Wesley Carvalho Barbosa
{"title":"Immediate Effects of Distinct Intensities of Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation on Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Kariny Realino do Rosário Ferreira, Maria de Cássia Souza Macedo, Ana Luiza Guimarães Alves, Arthur Ferreira Esquírio, Bianca Rossi Botim, Gabrielly Souza Jacob, Mayra Evelise Cunha Dos Santos, Gabriela Lopes Gama, Michelle Cristina Sales Almeida Barbosa, Alexandre Wesley Carvalho Barbosa","doi":"10.3390/neurosci5040043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the immediate effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on pain outcomes, measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and pressure pain thresholds in a cohort of 55 participants experiencing chronic pain using a controlled, randomized trial with 55 participants allocated into 2 groups: 2 mA and 0.5 mA of tsDCS for 20 min. Anodal stimulation was applied on the 12th thoracic vertebra, with the cathode positioned on the 7th cervical vertebra. Pain outcomes were assessed before and post intervention using the VAS and pressure algometry. Between- and within-group differences, along with chi-square tests, were used to determine the differences and responsiveness. Significance was established at <i>p</i> < 0.05. Findings showed significant temporal effects for both VAS (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and pressure algometry (<i>p</i> = 0.04). However, no between-group differences were noted for the time × group factor for VAS (<i>p</i> = 0.46) and pressure algometry (<i>p</i> = 0.78). No significant between-group differences were observed for the responsiveness analysis. The results indicate that a single 20-min session of 2 and 0.5 mA tsDCS improves pain scores for both intensities equally. However, there were no statistically significant between-group differences in pain perception or pressure pain threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":74294,"journal":{"name":"NeuroSci","volume":"5 4","pages":"614-622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11677310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci5040043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the immediate effects of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on pain outcomes, measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and pressure pain thresholds in a cohort of 55 participants experiencing chronic pain using a controlled, randomized trial with 55 participants allocated into 2 groups: 2 mA and 0.5 mA of tsDCS for 20 min. Anodal stimulation was applied on the 12th thoracic vertebra, with the cathode positioned on the 7th cervical vertebra. Pain outcomes were assessed before and post intervention using the VAS and pressure algometry. Between- and within-group differences, along with chi-square tests, were used to determine the differences and responsiveness. Significance was established at p < 0.05. Findings showed significant temporal effects for both VAS (p < 0.001) and pressure algometry (p = 0.04). However, no between-group differences were noted for the time × group factor for VAS (p = 0.46) and pressure algometry (p = 0.78). No significant between-group differences were observed for the responsiveness analysis. The results indicate that a single 20-min session of 2 and 0.5 mA tsDCS improves pain scores for both intensities equally. However, there were no statistically significant between-group differences in pain perception or pressure pain threshold.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同强度的经皮脊髓直流电刺激对慢性疼痛的直接影响:一项随机对照试验。
本研究旨在评估经皮脊髓直流电刺激(tsDCS)对疼痛结果的直接影响,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和压力痛阈值对55名慢性疼痛参与者进行了一项对照随机试验,将55名参与者分为2组:2 mA和0.5 mA的tsDCS,持续20分钟。在第12胸椎上施加阳极刺激,阴极位于第7颈椎。采用VAS和压力测量法评估干预前后的疼痛结果。采用组间和组内差异以及卡方检验来确定差异和响应性。p < 0.05具有显著性。结果显示VAS (p < 0.001)和压力测量(p = 0.04)的时间效应显著。然而,VAS的时间×组因子(p = 0.46)和压力测量(p = 0.78)组间无差异。在反应性分析中,组间无显著差异。结果表明,单次20分钟的2和0.5 mA tsDCS对两种强度的疼痛评分均有改善。然而,在疼痛感知和压力痛阈方面,组间差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Distinguishing Early from Late Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Magnetic Resonance Free-Water Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Intensive Speech Therapy for Hypokinetic Dysarthria in Parkinson's Disease: Targeting the Five Subsystems of Speech Production with Clinical and Instrumental Evaluation. Trends and Disparities in Parkinson's Disease Mortality in the United States with Predictions Using Machine Learning. Neurodegenerative Disorders in Criminal Offending and Cognitive Decline Among Aging Inmates. Nutritional Intervention in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, Correlation with Quality of Life and Disability-A Prospective and Quasi-Experimental Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1