Deconstructing delay discounting in human cocaine addiction using computational modelling and neuroimaging.

Michal M Graczyk, Rudolf N Cardinal, Tsen Vei Lim, Salvatore Nigro, Elijah Mak, Karen D Ersche
{"title":"Deconstructing delay discounting in human cocaine addiction using computational modelling and neuroimaging.","authors":"Michal M Graczyk, Rudolf N Cardinal, Tsen Vei Lim, Salvatore Nigro, Elijah Mak, Karen D Ersche","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A preference for sooner-smaller over later-larger rewards, known as delay discounting, is a candidate transdiagnostic marker of waiting impulsivity and a research domain criterion. While abnormal discounting rates have been associated with many psychiatric diagnoses and abnormal brain structure, the underlying neuropsychological processes remain largely unknown. Here, we deconstruct delay discounting into choice and rate processes by testing different computational models and investigate their associations with white matter tracts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with cocaine use disorder (CUD, n=107) and healthy participants (n=81) completed the Monetary Choice Questionnaire. We computed their discounting rate using the well-known Kirby method, plus logistic regression, single-subject and full hierarchical Bayesian models. In Bayesian models, we additionally included a choice sharpness parameter. Seventy CUD patients and 69 healthy participants also underwent diffusion tensor imaging tractography to quantify streamlines connecting the executive control and valuation brain networks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CUD patients showed significantly higher discounting rates, and lower choice sharpness, suggesting greater indifference in their choices. Importantly, the full Bayesian model had the greatest reliability for parameter recovery compared with Kirby and logistic regression methods. Using Bayesian estimates, we found that white matter streamlines connecting executive control network with the nucleus accumbens predicted discounting rate in healthy participants, but not in CUD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate that measuring delay discounting and choice sharpness directly with a novel computational model explains impulsive choices in CUD patients better than standard hyperbolic discounting. Our findings highlight a distinct neuropsychological phenotype of impulsive discounting, which may be generalizable to other patient groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.12.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A preference for sooner-smaller over later-larger rewards, known as delay discounting, is a candidate transdiagnostic marker of waiting impulsivity and a research domain criterion. While abnormal discounting rates have been associated with many psychiatric diagnoses and abnormal brain structure, the underlying neuropsychological processes remain largely unknown. Here, we deconstruct delay discounting into choice and rate processes by testing different computational models and investigate their associations with white matter tracts.

Methods: Patients with cocaine use disorder (CUD, n=107) and healthy participants (n=81) completed the Monetary Choice Questionnaire. We computed their discounting rate using the well-known Kirby method, plus logistic regression, single-subject and full hierarchical Bayesian models. In Bayesian models, we additionally included a choice sharpness parameter. Seventy CUD patients and 69 healthy participants also underwent diffusion tensor imaging tractography to quantify streamlines connecting the executive control and valuation brain networks.

Results: CUD patients showed significantly higher discounting rates, and lower choice sharpness, suggesting greater indifference in their choices. Importantly, the full Bayesian model had the greatest reliability for parameter recovery compared with Kirby and logistic regression methods. Using Bayesian estimates, we found that white matter streamlines connecting executive control network with the nucleus accumbens predicted discounting rate in healthy participants, but not in CUD patients.

Conclusions: We demonstrate that measuring delay discounting and choice sharpness directly with a novel computational model explains impulsive choices in CUD patients better than standard hyperbolic discounting. Our findings highlight a distinct neuropsychological phenotype of impulsive discounting, which may be generalizable to other patient groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Racial Discrimination-related Interoceptive Network Disruptions: A Pathway to Disconnection. Deconstructing delay discounting in human cocaine addiction using computational modelling and neuroimaging. Amygdala-centered emotional processing in Prolonged Grief Disorder: Relationship with clinical symptomatology. Delusional Unreality and Predictive Processing. Enhancing Equanimity with Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Novel Framework for Mindfulness Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1