An investigation of downstream processing methods for challenging skeletal samples

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Forensic Science International-Genetics Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103209
Jennifer L. Snedeker , Michelle A. Peck , David A. Russell , Amy S. Holmes , Christina M. Neal , Carmen R. Reedy , Sheree R. Hughes , Rachel M. Houston
{"title":"An investigation of downstream processing methods for challenging skeletal samples","authors":"Jennifer L. Snedeker ,&nbsp;Michelle A. Peck ,&nbsp;David A. Russell ,&nbsp;Amy S. Holmes ,&nbsp;Christina M. Neal ,&nbsp;Carmen R. Reedy ,&nbsp;Sheree R. Hughes ,&nbsp;Rachel M. Houston","doi":"10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While skeletal remains are known for their resilience and often serve as the final source of information for unidentified human remains (UHRs), the traditional downstream processing of these samples is challenging due to their low template nature, DNA degradation, and the presence of PCR inhibitors, typically resulting in limited probative information. To address this issue, advanced genotyping methods can be explored to retrieve additional genetic information from these challenging samples to maximize investigative leads. Therefore, this study investigated the effectiveness of three advanced genotyping methods and assessed their suitability with compromised skeletal samples: 1) targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of both STRs and SNPs using the ForenSeq® DNA Signature Prep chemistry, 2) targeted NGS of SNPs using the ForenSeq® Kintelligence kit, and 3) SNP genotyping using a microarray via the Infinium Global Screening Array. The genotype recovery and added investigative leads were compared across all methods. All three approaches demonstrated success with the challenging skeletal samples used in this study. Specifically, the ForenSeq® DNA Signature Prep chemistry outperformed traditional STR typing by improving the recovery of CODIS core loci. Additionally, the ForenSeq® Kintelligence kit and Infinium Global Screening Array provided eligible results for forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) searching. Based on these successes, we have developed a proposed workflow for downstream processing of challenging skeletal samples. Following the guidelines of the US Department of Justice, the recovery of the CODIS core loci should be attempted through traditional CE-based methods or a NDIS-approved NGS chemistry, such as ForenSeq® DNA Signature Prep. Alternatively, a mitochondrial DNA profile may be uploaded to CODIS for comparisons in UHR cases. However, if no probative information is developed from the forensic profile uploaded to CODIS, then FIGG methods can be implemented using the Infinium Global Screening Array for high-quality skeletal samples (DNA concentrations ≥ 0.5 ng/µL) or the ForenSeq® Kintelligence chemistry for low-template skeletal remains (DNA concentration ≤ 0.5 ng/µL). These findings provide valuable insight into the suitability and efficacy of advanced genotyping methods, offering promising opportunities for enhancing the investigation of cases involving UHRs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50435,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 103209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International-Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497324002059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While skeletal remains are known for their resilience and often serve as the final source of information for unidentified human remains (UHRs), the traditional downstream processing of these samples is challenging due to their low template nature, DNA degradation, and the presence of PCR inhibitors, typically resulting in limited probative information. To address this issue, advanced genotyping methods can be explored to retrieve additional genetic information from these challenging samples to maximize investigative leads. Therefore, this study investigated the effectiveness of three advanced genotyping methods and assessed their suitability with compromised skeletal samples: 1) targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of both STRs and SNPs using the ForenSeq® DNA Signature Prep chemistry, 2) targeted NGS of SNPs using the ForenSeq® Kintelligence kit, and 3) SNP genotyping using a microarray via the Infinium Global Screening Array. The genotype recovery and added investigative leads were compared across all methods. All three approaches demonstrated success with the challenging skeletal samples used in this study. Specifically, the ForenSeq® DNA Signature Prep chemistry outperformed traditional STR typing by improving the recovery of CODIS core loci. Additionally, the ForenSeq® Kintelligence kit and Infinium Global Screening Array provided eligible results for forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) searching. Based on these successes, we have developed a proposed workflow for downstream processing of challenging skeletal samples. Following the guidelines of the US Department of Justice, the recovery of the CODIS core loci should be attempted through traditional CE-based methods or a NDIS-approved NGS chemistry, such as ForenSeq® DNA Signature Prep. Alternatively, a mitochondrial DNA profile may be uploaded to CODIS for comparisons in UHR cases. However, if no probative information is developed from the forensic profile uploaded to CODIS, then FIGG methods can be implemented using the Infinium Global Screening Array for high-quality skeletal samples (DNA concentrations ≥ 0.5 ng/µL) or the ForenSeq® Kintelligence chemistry for low-template skeletal remains (DNA concentration ≤ 0.5 ng/µL). These findings provide valuable insight into the suitability and efficacy of advanced genotyping methods, offering promising opportunities for enhancing the investigation of cases involving UHRs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有挑战性的骨骼样品的下游处理方法的调查。
虽然骨骼遗骸以其弹性而闻名,并且通常作为身份不明的人类遗骸(uhr)的最终信息来源,但由于其低模板性质,DNA降解和PCR抑制剂的存在,这些样本的传统下游处理具有挑战性,通常导致有限的证明信息。为了解决这个问题,可以探索先进的基因分型方法,从这些具有挑战性的样本中检索额外的遗传信息,以最大限度地提高调查线索。因此,本研究研究了三种先进的基因分型方法的有效性,并评估了它们对骨骼样本的适用性:1)使用ForenSeq®DNA Signature Prep化学对STRs和SNP进行靶向下一代测序(NGS), 2)使用ForenSeq®Kintelligence试剂盒对SNP进行靶向NGS,以及3)使用Infinium Global Screening Array使用微阵列进行SNP基因分型。对所有方法的基因型恢复和增加的调查线索进行比较。所有三种方法都证明了在本研究中使用的具有挑战性的骨骼样本的成功。具体来说,ForenSeq®DNA Signature Prep化学通过提高CODIS核心位点的恢复,优于传统的STR分型。此外,ForenSeq®Kintelligence试剂盒和Infinium Global Screening Array为法医调查遗传谱系(FIGG)搜索提供了合格的结果。基于这些成功,我们已经开发了一个具有挑战性的骨骼样本下游处理的工作流程。根据美国司法部的指导方针,CODIS核心基因座的恢复应该通过传统的基于ce的方法或ndis批准的NGS化学方法(如ForenSeq®DNA Signature Prep)进行。或者,可以将线粒体DNA图谱上传到CODIS进行UHR病例的比较。但是,如果没有从上传到CODIS的法医档案中开发出证据信息,则可以使用Infinium Global Screening Array对高质量骨骼样本(DNA浓度≥0.5 ng/µL)或ForenSeq®Kintelligence化学对低模板骨骼遗骸(DNA浓度≤0.5 ng/µL)实施FIGG方法。这些发现对先进基因分型方法的适用性和有效性提供了有价值的见解,为加强涉及uhr病例的调查提供了有希望的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
32.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International: Genetics is the premier journal in the field of Forensic Genetics. This branch of Forensic Science can be defined as the application of genetics to human and non-human material (in the sense of a science with the purpose of studying inherited characteristics for the analysis of inter- and intra-specific variations in populations) for the resolution of legal conflicts. The scope of the journal includes: Forensic applications of human polymorphism. Testing of paternity and other family relationships, immigration cases, typing of biological stains and tissues from criminal casework, identification of human remains by DNA testing methodologies. Description of human polymorphisms of forensic interest, with special interest in DNA polymorphisms. Autosomal DNA polymorphisms, mini- and microsatellites (or short tandem repeats, STRs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), X and Y chromosome polymorphisms, mtDNA polymorphisms, and any other type of DNA variation with potential forensic applications. Non-human DNA polymorphisms for crime scene investigation. Population genetics of human polymorphisms of forensic interest. Population data, especially from DNA polymorphisms of interest for the solution of forensic problems. DNA typing methodologies and strategies. Biostatistical methods in forensic genetics. Evaluation of DNA evidence in forensic problems (such as paternity or immigration cases, criminal casework, identification), classical and new statistical approaches. Standards in forensic genetics. Recommendations of regulatory bodies concerning methods, markers, interpretation or strategies or proposals for procedural or technical standards. Quality control. Quality control and quality assurance strategies, proficiency testing for DNA typing methodologies. Criminal DNA databases. Technical, legal and statistical issues. General ethical and legal issues related to forensic genetics.
期刊最新文献
Investigation into the genotyping performance of a unique molecular identifier based microhaplotypes MPS panel in complex DNA mixture Massively parallel sequencing of a forensic combined panel of 107-plex STR loci and 292-plex SNP loci in the Han Chinese population Editorial Board The IPEFA model: An initiative for online training and education as applied by the International Society for Forensic Genetics Preparing for shotgun sequencing in forensic genetics – Evaluation of DNA extraction and library building methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1