Does ambiguity drive the disposition effect?

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103887
Hideki Iwaki , Daisuke Yoshikawa
{"title":"Does ambiguity drive the disposition effect?","authors":"Hideki Iwaki ,&nbsp;Daisuke Yoshikawa","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The disposition effect is a financial puzzle that is often reported in empirical studies. Although several theoretical explanations have been proposed, a unified view has yet to be reached to solve the puzzle. We explain the effect by extending the model of Barberis and Xiong (2009), which is the first to formally link prospect theory and disposition effects using a binomial model of stock prices by incorporating ambiguous attitudes under the Expected Utility with Uncertain Probabilities (EUUP) advocated by Izhakian (2017). In the behavioral setting constructed by Barberis and Xiong (2009), our model demonstrates significant progress in highlighting the importance of the realized annual terminal wealth and its impact on the disposition effect. We analytically show the threshold values of the perceived probability that the disposition effects appear. Our research finds that the disposition effect is observed when investors derive utility from the difference between the realized annual terminal wealth and the initial reference wealth point. We confirm this through a rigorous process of numerical examples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103887"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924008196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The disposition effect is a financial puzzle that is often reported in empirical studies. Although several theoretical explanations have been proposed, a unified view has yet to be reached to solve the puzzle. We explain the effect by extending the model of Barberis and Xiong (2009), which is the first to formally link prospect theory and disposition effects using a binomial model of stock prices by incorporating ambiguous attitudes under the Expected Utility with Uncertain Probabilities (EUUP) advocated by Izhakian (2017). In the behavioral setting constructed by Barberis and Xiong (2009), our model demonstrates significant progress in highlighting the importance of the realized annual terminal wealth and its impact on the disposition effect. We analytically show the threshold values of the perceived probability that the disposition effects appear. Our research finds that the disposition effect is observed when investors derive utility from the difference between the realized annual terminal wealth and the initial reference wealth point. We confirm this through a rigorous process of numerical examples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
歧义是否驱动倾向效应?
处置效应是实证研究中经常报道的一个金融难题。尽管已经提出了几种理论解释,但尚未达成一个统一的观点来解决这个难题。我们通过扩展Barberis和Xiong(2009)的模型来解释这一效应,该模型首次使用股票价格的二项模型,通过纳入Izhakian(2017)所主张的期望效用与不确定概率(EUUP)下的模糊态度,将前景理论与处置效应正式联系起来。在Barberis和Xiong(2009)构建的行为设置中,我们的模型在突出已实现的年度终端财富的重要性及其对配置效应的影响方面取得了显著进展。我们分析显示的阈值感知概率的处置效应出现。我们的研究发现,当投资者从已实现的年度终端财富与初始参考财富点之间的差额中获得效用时,可以观察到配置效应。我们通过一个严格的数值例子过程来证实这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Carbon performance and CDS spreads: Unveiling the role of governance mechanisms in shaping dynamic distress risk Data assetization and audit fees Microstructure-based private information and institutional return predictability Never waste a crisis: Do stock market manipulators exploit geopolitical risks? Herding behaviour in equity crowdfunding and P2P lending markets: A systematic meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1