The natural history of portal venous system aneurysms.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102163
Mary A Binko, Elizabeth A Andraska, Katherine M Reitz, Robert M Handzel, Michael J Singh, Natalie D Sridharan, Rabih A Chaer, Eric S Hager
{"title":"The natural history of portal venous system aneurysms.","authors":"Mary A Binko, Elizabeth A Andraska, Katherine M Reitz, Robert M Handzel, Michael J Singh, Natalie D Sridharan, Rabih A Chaer, Eric S Hager","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Portal venous system aneurysms (PVAs) are increasingly diagnosed on cross-sectional computed tomography imaging. However, the natural history of these aneurysms is poorly understood, and reports are limited to small case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Terms relevant to PVAs were searched in radiology reports (2010-2022), with PVA presence confirmed by manual review. PVA were defined as a diameter greater than 1.5 cm in patients without cirrhosis and 1.9 cm in those with cirrhosis. Aneurysm growth was defined as greater than 20% increase in size, whereas aneurysm regression was defined as greater than 20% decrease in size. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and PVA outcomes were abstracted. Univariate statistics were used to compare groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight aneurysms with radiographic follow up were identified in 35 patients, involving the portal vein (n = 18; 47.4%), splenic vein (n = 10; 26.3%), superior mesenteric vein (n = 3; 7.9%), and portal confluence (n = 7; 18.4%). Although 12 (31.6%) were idiopathic, the remaining 26 (68.4%) were associated with portal hypertension (n = 20; 52.6%) and prior liver transplant (n = 4; 10.5%). The median growth was 0.2 cm (range, -2.6 to 2.4 cm) over median follow up over 5.0 years (range, 0.3-16.6 years). Five PVAs (13.2%) regressed and were largely idiopathic (80.0%; P = .03). Thirteen PVAs (34.2%) grew and were associated with portal hypertension (n = 11; 84.6%; P = .003) and thrombosis (n = 6; 46.2%; P = .05). Nine PVAs (23.7%) thrombosed, predominantly in males (n =7; 77.8%). The median growth was 1.0 cm (range, -0.7 to 1.9 cm). Three patients (33.3%) were symptomatic from PVA thrombosis including abdominal pain (n = 2; 22.2%), intestinal ischemia (n = 1; 11.1%), and variceal bleeding (n = 2; 22.2%). Four patients (44.4%) were treated with anticoagulation. No aneurysms ruptured. Of the 58 PVAs initially identified with and without radiographic follow up, five (8.6%) underwent intervention with a median diameter of 4.0 cm (range, 3.4-5 cm). Intervention included vein ligation (n = 1; 20.0%), aneurysmorrhaphy (n = 1; 20.0%), and aneurysmectomy (n = 3; 60.0%). There was one case of aneurysm recurrence 20 years following resection and one postoperative mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two-thirds of PVAa, including those with size greater than 3 cm, remain stable on surveillance. Although annual surveillance is initially recommended to confirm PVA stability, interval imaging can be subsequently extended given low growth rates. Over 20% of PVAs thrombosed, but none ruptured. Although we did not observe any cases of rupture, the devastating consequences of rupture necessitate consideration of surgical intervention for large symptomatic PVAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","volume":" ","pages":"102163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Portal venous system aneurysms (PVAs) are increasingly diagnosed on cross-sectional computed tomography imaging. However, the natural history of these aneurysms is poorly understood, and reports are limited to small case series.

Methods: Terms relevant to PVAs were searched in radiology reports (2010-2022), with PVA presence confirmed by manual review. PVA were defined as a diameter greater than 1.5 cm in patients without cirrhosis and 1.9 cm in those with cirrhosis. Aneurysm growth was defined as greater than 20% increase in size, whereas aneurysm regression was defined as greater than 20% decrease in size. Patient demographics, comorbid conditions, and PVA outcomes were abstracted. Univariate statistics were used to compare groups.

Results: Thirty-eight aneurysms with radiographic follow up were identified in 35 patients, involving the portal vein (n = 18; 47.4%), splenic vein (n = 10; 26.3%), superior mesenteric vein (n = 3; 7.9%), and portal confluence (n = 7; 18.4%). Although 12 (31.6%) were idiopathic, the remaining 26 (68.4%) were associated with portal hypertension (n = 20; 52.6%) and prior liver transplant (n = 4; 10.5%). The median growth was 0.2 cm (range, -2.6 to 2.4 cm) over median follow up over 5.0 years (range, 0.3-16.6 years). Five PVAs (13.2%) regressed and were largely idiopathic (80.0%; P = .03). Thirteen PVAs (34.2%) grew and were associated with portal hypertension (n = 11; 84.6%; P = .003) and thrombosis (n = 6; 46.2%; P = .05). Nine PVAs (23.7%) thrombosed, predominantly in males (n =7; 77.8%). The median growth was 1.0 cm (range, -0.7 to 1.9 cm). Three patients (33.3%) were symptomatic from PVA thrombosis including abdominal pain (n = 2; 22.2%), intestinal ischemia (n = 1; 11.1%), and variceal bleeding (n = 2; 22.2%). Four patients (44.4%) were treated with anticoagulation. No aneurysms ruptured. Of the 58 PVAs initially identified with and without radiographic follow up, five (8.6%) underwent intervention with a median diameter of 4.0 cm (range, 3.4-5 cm). Intervention included vein ligation (n = 1; 20.0%), aneurysmorrhaphy (n = 1; 20.0%), and aneurysmectomy (n = 3; 60.0%). There was one case of aneurysm recurrence 20 years following resection and one postoperative mortality.

Conclusions: Two-thirds of PVAa, including those with size greater than 3 cm, remain stable on surveillance. Although annual surveillance is initially recommended to confirm PVA stability, interval imaging can be subsequently extended given low growth rates. Over 20% of PVAs thrombosed, but none ruptured. Although we did not observe any cases of rupture, the devastating consequences of rupture necessitate consideration of surgical intervention for large symptomatic PVAs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门静脉系统动脉瘤的自然史。
背景:门静脉系统动脉瘤(PVA)越来越多地被诊断为横断面计算机断层扫描(CT)。然而,这些动脉瘤的自然历史知之甚少,报道仅限于小病例系列。方法:检索2010-2022年放射学报告中与PVA相关的术语,并通过人工审查确认PVA的存在。无肝硬化患者的PVA直径大于1.5 cm,肝硬化患者的PVA直径大于1.9 cm。动脉瘤生长被定义为体积增大20%以上,而动脉瘤消退被定义为体积减小20%以上。患者统计资料、合并症和PVA结果被抽象化。采用单变量统计进行组间比较。结果:35例患者经x线随访发现动脉瘤38个,其中门静脉18个,占47.4%,脾静脉10个,占26.3%,肠系膜上静脉3个,占7.9%,门静脉汇合处7个,占18.4%。其中12例(31.6%)为特发性,其余26例(68.4%)与门静脉高压症(n=20, 52.6%)和既往肝移植(n=4, 10.5%)相关。中位生长为0.2厘米(-2.6-2.4厘米),中位随访超过5.0年(0.3-16.6年)。5例(13.2%)PVA复发,多数为特发性(80.0%,p=0.03)。13例(34.2%)PVA增大并合并门静脉高压症(n=11、84.6%,p=0.003)和血栓形成(n=6、46.2%,p=0.05)。9例(23.7%)PVA血栓形成,主要为男性(n=7, 77.8%)。中位生长为1.0 cm (-0.7-1.9 cm)。3例(33.3%)患者有PVA血栓形成的症状,包括腹痛(n=2, 22.2%)、肠缺血(n=1, 11.1%)和静脉曲张出血(n=2, 22.2%)。4例(44.4%)患者接受抗凝治疗。无动脉瘤破裂。在最初确定的58例PVA中,有或没有x线随访,5例(8.6%)接受了中位直径为4.0 cm (3.4-5 cm)的干预。干预措施包括静脉结扎(n=1, 20.0%)、动脉瘤吻合(n=1, 20.0%)和动脉瘤切除术(n=3, 60.0%)。术后20年动脉瘤复发1例,术后死亡1例。结论:三分之二的PVA(包括大于3cm的PVA)在监测中保持稳定。虽然最初建议进行年度监测以确认PVA的稳定性,但考虑到低生长速率,可以延长间隔成像时间。超过20%的PVA血栓形成,但没有破裂。虽然我们没有观察到任何破裂的病例,但破裂的破坏性后果需要考虑对大面积症状性PVA进行手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders SURGERYPERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE&n-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
328
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders is one of a series of specialist journals launched by the Journal of Vascular Surgery. It aims to be the premier international Journal of medical, endovascular and surgical management of venous and lymphatic disorders. It publishes high quality clinical, research, case reports, techniques, and practice manuscripts related to all aspects of venous and lymphatic disorders, including malformations and wound care, with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals who treat patients presenting with vascular and lymphatic disorders. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of these organizations and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
Continuation of Anticoagulation through Ambulatory Phlebectomy Does Not Impact Post-Operative Bleeding Risk. Mechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter Directed Thrombolysis Utilization in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis of a database of a tertiary hospital. PROMISING RESULTS OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED FOAM SCLEROTHERAPY FOR TREATING CHRONIC VENOUS ULCERS. A preliminary experience on the efficacy, safety and short-term results in the treatment of acute bilateral iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with the Angiojet rheolytic thrombectomy. The value of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the grading of primary lower extremity lymphedema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1