Intrafraction Patient Positional Uncertainty in Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy with Abdominal Compression.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Practical Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.001
Yohan A Walter, Chiachien J Wang, Daniel B Speir, William E Burrell, Carlos D Palomeque, James C Henry, Megan M Rodrigues, Troy D Jacobs, Bethany L Broekhoven, Joseph P Dugas, Anne N Hubbard, Philip F Durham, Hsinshun T Wu
{"title":"Intrafraction Patient Positional Uncertainty in Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy with Abdominal Compression.","authors":"Yohan A Walter, Chiachien J Wang, Daniel B Speir, William E Burrell, Carlos D Palomeque, James C Henry, Megan M Rodrigues, Troy D Jacobs, Bethany L Broekhoven, Joseph P Dugas, Anne N Hubbard, Philip F Durham, Hsinshun T Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Motion management presents a significant challenge in thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Currently, a 5.0 mm standard planning target volume (PTV) margin is widely used to ensure adequate dose to the tumor. Considering recent advancements in tumor localization and motion management, there is merit to reassessing the necessary PTV margins for modern techniques. This work presents a large-scale analysis of intrafraction repositioning for lung SABR under forced shallow breathing to determine the margin requirements for modern delivery techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Treatment data for 124 lung SABR patients treated in 607 fractions on a linear accelerator were retrospectively collected for analysis. All patients were treated using pneumatic abdominal compression and intrafraction 4D cone beam computed tomography (4D CBCT)-guided repositioning halfway through treatment. Executed repositioning shifts were collected and used to calculate margin requirements using the 2-standard deviation (2SD) method and an analytic model which accounts for systematic and random errors in treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85.7% of treated fractions had 3D repositioning shifts under 5.0 mm. 53 fractions (8.7%) had shifts ≥5.0 mm in at least one direction. Margins in the right-left, inferior-superior, and posterior-anterior directions were 3.62 mm, 4.34 mm, and 3.50 mm, respectively, calculated using the 2SD method. The analytic approach estimated 4.01 mm, 4.37 mm, and 3.95 mm margins were appropriate for our workflow. Executing intrafraction repositioning reduced margin requirements by 0.73 ± 0.07 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical data suggests that the uniform 5.0 mm margin is conservative for our workflow. Utilizing modern techniques such as 4D CT, 4D CBCT, and effective motion management can significantly reduce required margins, and therefore necessary healthy tissue dose. However, the limitations of margin calculation models must be considered, and margin reduction must be approached with caution. Users should conduct a formal risk assessment prior to adopting new standard PTV margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2024.12.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Motion management presents a significant challenge in thoracic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Currently, a 5.0 mm standard planning target volume (PTV) margin is widely used to ensure adequate dose to the tumor. Considering recent advancements in tumor localization and motion management, there is merit to reassessing the necessary PTV margins for modern techniques. This work presents a large-scale analysis of intrafraction repositioning for lung SABR under forced shallow breathing to determine the margin requirements for modern delivery techniques.

Methods and materials: Treatment data for 124 lung SABR patients treated in 607 fractions on a linear accelerator were retrospectively collected for analysis. All patients were treated using pneumatic abdominal compression and intrafraction 4D cone beam computed tomography (4D CBCT)-guided repositioning halfway through treatment. Executed repositioning shifts were collected and used to calculate margin requirements using the 2-standard deviation (2SD) method and an analytic model which accounts for systematic and random errors in treatment.

Results: 85.7% of treated fractions had 3D repositioning shifts under 5.0 mm. 53 fractions (8.7%) had shifts ≥5.0 mm in at least one direction. Margins in the right-left, inferior-superior, and posterior-anterior directions were 3.62 mm, 4.34 mm, and 3.50 mm, respectively, calculated using the 2SD method. The analytic approach estimated 4.01 mm, 4.37 mm, and 3.95 mm margins were appropriate for our workflow. Executing intrafraction repositioning reduced margin requirements by 0.73 ± 0.07 mm.

Conclusions: Clinical data suggests that the uniform 5.0 mm margin is conservative for our workflow. Utilizing modern techniques such as 4D CT, 4D CBCT, and effective motion management can significantly reduce required margins, and therefore necessary healthy tissue dose. However, the limitations of margin calculation models must be considered, and margin reduction must be approached with caution. Users should conduct a formal risk assessment prior to adopting new standard PTV margins.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
期刊最新文献
Defining an Undergraduate Radiation Oncology Microclerkship via the Delphi Method. Patterns of recurrence following radiation and ADT for pathologic lymph node positive prostate cancer: A multi-institutional study. Intrafraction Patient Positional Uncertainty in Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy with Abdominal Compression. Radiopharmaceutical therapy and radioembolization: Clinical guidance for medical physicists in radiation oncology. On-Table Virtual Reality to Reduce Anxiety/Distress during Radiotherapy Treatments: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1