Inter- and Intra-observer Reproducibility of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology: An investigation of Bethesda 2023 Using Immunohistochemical BRAFV600E Antibody.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Cytology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI:10.4103/joc.joc_26_24
Erdogan Bahattin, Dündar Emine, Çetin Kısmet Çivi, Yılmaz Fatih
{"title":"Inter- and Intra-observer Reproducibility of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology: An investigation of Bethesda 2023 Using Immunohistochemical BRAFV600E Antibody.","authors":"Erdogan Bahattin, Dündar Emine, Çetin Kısmet Çivi, Yılmaz Fatih","doi":"10.4103/joc.joc_26_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) recommended for the interpretation of needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid, is the most widely used worldwide. Studies have shown that the disagreement between observers, especially in the Bethesda III and IV diagnostic categories, is not insignificant at 10%-40%. In the TBSRTC 2023 version, some definitions were removed and simplified, and molecular pathology was proposed as a complement to cytopathology. The current availability of molecular tests is limited because they can be performed in a few centers and are expensive. Therefore, our study investigated intra- and inter-observer agreement according to TBSRTC 2023 using only immunohistochemically BRAFV600E antibodies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 173 cases with aspiration cytology evaluated between 2019 and 2022. The immunohistochemical procedure applied BRAFV600E (RM8) monoclonal antibody to cell block sections. All slides were assessed and categorized by three different observers. Data were interpreted using Cohen's kappa and Fleiss's kappa test in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences Windows 2021 program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the applied RM8 antibody, sensitivity was 64.71% and specificity was 87.27%. In terms of diagnostic categories, inter-observer agreement was good for Bethesda II (<i>K</i> = 0.606) and moderate for Bethesda III (<i>K</i> = 0.429), Bethesda IV (<i>K</i> = 0.523), Bethesda V (<i>K</i> = 0,464), and Bethesda VI (<i>K</i> = 0.544), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the study reveals that the 2023 version of TBSRTC provides improvement, especially in the categories of uncertain diagnosis, but is still insufficient to improve cytological diagnostic accuracy, at which point molecular analyses become even more important.</p>","PeriodicalId":50217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cytology","volume":"41 4","pages":"221-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cytology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joc.joc_26_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) recommended for the interpretation of needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid, is the most widely used worldwide. Studies have shown that the disagreement between observers, especially in the Bethesda III and IV diagnostic categories, is not insignificant at 10%-40%. In the TBSRTC 2023 version, some definitions were removed and simplified, and molecular pathology was proposed as a complement to cytopathology. The current availability of molecular tests is limited because they can be performed in a few centers and are expensive. Therefore, our study investigated intra- and inter-observer agreement according to TBSRTC 2023 using only immunohistochemically BRAFV600E antibodies.

Materials and methods: The study included 173 cases with aspiration cytology evaluated between 2019 and 2022. The immunohistochemical procedure applied BRAFV600E (RM8) monoclonal antibody to cell block sections. All slides were assessed and categorized by three different observers. Data were interpreted using Cohen's kappa and Fleiss's kappa test in the Statistical Package for Social Sciences Windows 2021 program.

Results: For the applied RM8 antibody, sensitivity was 64.71% and specificity was 87.27%. In terms of diagnostic categories, inter-observer agreement was good for Bethesda II (K = 0.606) and moderate for Bethesda III (K = 0.429), Bethesda IV (K = 0.523), Bethesda V (K = 0,464), and Bethesda VI (K = 0.544), respectively.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the study reveals that the 2023 version of TBSRTC provides improvement, especially in the categories of uncertain diagnosis, but is still insufficient to improve cytological diagnostic accuracy, at which point molecular analyses become even more important.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学观察间和观察内的可重复性:使用免疫组织化学BRAFV600E抗体对Bethesda 2023的研究
背景:Bethesda系统报告甲状腺细胞学(TBSRTC)推荐用于解释针吸甲状腺细胞学,是世界上使用最广泛的。研究表明,观察者之间的分歧,特别是在Bethesda III和IV诊断类别中,并非微不足道,为10%-40%。在TBSRTC 2023版本中,删除和简化了一些定义,并提出分子病理学作为细胞病理学的补充。目前分子检测的可用性是有限的,因为它们只能在几个中心进行,而且价格昂贵。因此,我们的研究仅使用免疫组织化学BRAFV600E抗体,根据TBSRTC 2023调查了观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性。材料与方法:本研究纳入2019 - 2022年173例吸痰细胞学评估病例。免疫组织化学方法将BRAFV600E (RM8)单克隆抗体应用于细胞块切片。所有的幻灯片都由三个不同的观察者进行评估和分类。使用社会科学视窗2021程序统计软件包中的Cohen's kappa和Fleiss's kappa检验来解释数据。结果:应用RM8抗体,敏感性为64.71%,特异性为87.27%。在诊断类别方面,Bethesda II的观察者间一致性较好(K = 0.606), Bethesda III (K = 0.429)、Bethesda IV (K = 0.523)、Bethesda V (K = 0,464)和Bethesda VI (K = 0.544)的观察者间一致性中等。结论:综上所述,本研究表明2023版TBSRTC在诊断不确定类别方面有所改进,但仍不足以提高细胞学诊断的准确性,此时分子分析就显得尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cytology
Journal of Cytology MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
46 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cytology is the official Quarterly publication of the Indian Academy of Cytologists. It is in the 25th year of publication in the year 2008. The journal covers all aspects of diagnostic cytology, including fine needle aspiration cytology, gynecological and non-gynecological cytology. Articles on ancillary techniques, like cytochemistry, immunocytochemistry, electron microscopy, molecular cytopathology, as applied to cytological material are also welcome. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.
期刊最新文献
A Combination of Cell Findings Improves the Accuracy of Voided Urine Cytology. A Diagnostic Study Using STARD Platform on Liquid-Based Cytology in Cervical Smear and Its Positivity Rate among Females with Abnormal Vaginal Conditions Attending a Tertiary Care Center. Application of the Sydney System for Classification and Reporting Lymph Node Cytopathology to Assess the Risk of Malignancy and its Diagnostic Accuracy. Diagnostic Utility of Squash Smear Cytology in Chordoma: A Tertiary Care Center Experience. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Ovarian Tumors With Histopathological Correlation: A Revisit to Borderline Category.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1