The impact of track and field training on dynapenia: gender differences in age-related decline of vertical jump performance among older adults.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2024.1504789
Eneko Fernández-Peña, Eugenio Formiglio, Marco Gervasi, Piero Benelli, Alexander Bertuccioli, Giuseppe Russo, Valerio Giustino, Antonino Patti
{"title":"The impact of track and field training on dynapenia: gender differences in age-related decline of vertical jump performance among older adults.","authors":"Eneko Fernández-Peña, Eugenio Formiglio, Marco Gervasi, Piero Benelli, Alexander Bertuccioli, Giuseppe Russo, Valerio Giustino, Antonino Patti","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2024.1504789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alongside sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle strength and power, known as dynapenia, increases the risk of functional disability and mortality in older adults. However, engaging in sporting activities during old age appears to enhance functional capacity. The differences in effects between athletes and sedentary individuals, as well as between genders, have yet to be fully clarified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The vertical jump test is recognized as a measure of lower limb performance with almost no learning effect. In the present study, we quantified age-related countermovement jump (CMJ) height loss in 120 subjects over 58 years old among both master athletes and sedentary counterparts, and analysed gender differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both male and female master athletes showed significantly higher jump heights results than their sedentary counterparts (male athletes 28.5 ± 4.3 cm vs. male sedentaries 15.1 ± 5.2 cm; <i>p</i> < 0.01; female athletes 22.7 ± 2.5 cm vs. female sedentaries 8.2 ± 3.3 cm; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Female athletes were found to have higher CMJ performance than even sedentary men (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The rate of decline in jumping ability was the same for male athletes and non-athletes, but female athletes had the shallower rate of decline of all the groups observed (2.78 cm per decade).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Sporting activity in the older age allows both men and women to perform at a higher level, with the latter also benefiting from a slower rate of decline, which can have a positive impact on functional ability and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":"5 ","pages":"1504789"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2024.1504789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alongside sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle strength and power, known as dynapenia, increases the risk of functional disability and mortality in older adults. However, engaging in sporting activities during old age appears to enhance functional capacity. The differences in effects between athletes and sedentary individuals, as well as between genders, have yet to be fully clarified.

Methods: The vertical jump test is recognized as a measure of lower limb performance with almost no learning effect. In the present study, we quantified age-related countermovement jump (CMJ) height loss in 120 subjects over 58 years old among both master athletes and sedentary counterparts, and analysed gender differences.

Results: Both male and female master athletes showed significantly higher jump heights results than their sedentary counterparts (male athletes 28.5 ± 4.3 cm vs. male sedentaries 15.1 ± 5.2 cm; p < 0.01; female athletes 22.7 ± 2.5 cm vs. female sedentaries 8.2 ± 3.3 cm; p < 0.01). Female athletes were found to have higher CMJ performance than even sedentary men (p < 0.01). The rate of decline in jumping ability was the same for male athletes and non-athletes, but female athletes had the shallower rate of decline of all the groups observed (2.78 cm per decade).

Discussion: Sporting activity in the older age allows both men and women to perform at a higher level, with the latter also benefiting from a slower rate of decline, which can have a positive impact on functional ability and quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
田径训练对运动障碍的影响:老年人垂直跳远成绩年龄相关性下降的性别差异。
与肌肉减少症一起,与年龄相关的肌肉力量和力量的丧失,即所谓的肌肉萎缩,增加了老年人功能性残疾和死亡率的风险。然而,在老年时期从事体育活动似乎可以增强功能。运动员和久坐不动的人之间以及性别之间的影响差异尚未完全澄清。方法:垂直起跳测试是公认的下肢运动能力测试,几乎没有学习效果。在本研究中,我们量化了120名58岁以上的运动健将和久坐运动员的年龄相关的反动作跳跃(CMJ)身高损失,并分析了性别差异。结果:男、女运动健将的跳高均显著高于久坐者(男运动员28.5±4.3 cm比久坐者15.1±5.2 cm;P < 0.01;女性运动员22.7±2.5 cm vs女性久坐者8.2±3.3 cm;P < 0.01)。女性运动员的CMJ表现甚至高于久坐不动的男性(p < 0.01)。男性运动员和非运动员的跳跃能力下降速率相同,但女性运动员的下降速率较低(每十年2.78厘米)。讨论:老年人的体育活动可以使男性和女性在更高的水平上表现,后者也受益于较慢的衰退速度,这可以对功能能力和生活质量产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Relationship between albumin-corrected anion gap and lumbar spine bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study. Effects of group music sessions on cognitive and psychological functions in healthy older adults. Editorial: Pathogen-induced immunosenescence: where do vaccines stand? Investigating shared risk variants and genetic etiology between Alzheimer's disease and three stress-related psychiatric disorders: a large-scale genome-wide cross-trait analysis. Immunogenetics of longevity and its association with human endogenous retrovirus K.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1