Patterns, determinants, and outcomes of early use of antidementia drugs: A 6-year multicenter cohort study in Thailand

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Archives of gerontology and geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2024.105727
Sirayut Phatthanasobhon , Noppaket Singkham , Nat Na-Ek , Yuttana Wongsalap , Watchara Rattanachaisit , Yaowaret Mekkhayai , Kittipong Onseng , Roungtiva Muenpa , Pimsai Chindasu , Piyarat Winitkulchai , Pajaree Mongkhon
{"title":"Patterns, determinants, and outcomes of early use of antidementia drugs: A 6-year multicenter cohort study in Thailand","authors":"Sirayut Phatthanasobhon ,&nbsp;Noppaket Singkham ,&nbsp;Nat Na-Ek ,&nbsp;Yuttana Wongsalap ,&nbsp;Watchara Rattanachaisit ,&nbsp;Yaowaret Mekkhayai ,&nbsp;Kittipong Onseng ,&nbsp;Roungtiva Muenpa ,&nbsp;Pimsai Chindasu ,&nbsp;Piyarat Winitkulchai ,&nbsp;Pajaree Mongkhon","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence on antidementia drugs (ADD) use in developing countries, where accessibility to ADD is challenging, is limited. Our aim was to examine prescribing patterns, factors, and outcomes associated with the early-ADD use (within 3 months from diagnosis) in people with dementia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study included individuals aged ≥ 60 years with dementia from three hospitals in Thailand between 2015 and 2020. Participants were categorized as non-ADD users, early-ADD users, and delayed users. ADD switching and one-year persistence were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with early-ADD prescribing and its impact on clinical outcomes, including in-hospital death and hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>3,116 patients were included. The ADD prescription rate was 14.31 %, with 79.82 % of those being early-ADD users. Donepezil was the most prescribed (70.18 %). The one-year persistence rate of any ADD was 24.89 %. Factors associated with early-ADD use included the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme, dyslipidemia, and dementia type. Early-ADD use was associated with reduced in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.46, 95 % CI: 0.22–0.96, <em>p</em> = 0.038) and hospitalization (adjusted OR = 0.70 95 % CI: 0.51–0.97, <em>p</em> = 0.034) after controlling for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ADD prescription rates were relatively low, with a one-year persistence rate of 25 %. Early-ADD use may improve clinical outcomes by reducing hospitalization and in-hospital mortality. These findings provide clinical features of ADD used in real-world settings and highlight the need for adherence to practice standards and strategies to promote ADD persistence among individuals with dementia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8306,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 105727"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324004023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Evidence on antidementia drugs (ADD) use in developing countries, where accessibility to ADD is challenging, is limited. Our aim was to examine prescribing patterns, factors, and outcomes associated with the early-ADD use (within 3 months from diagnosis) in people with dementia.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study included individuals aged ≥ 60 years with dementia from three hospitals in Thailand between 2015 and 2020. Participants were categorized as non-ADD users, early-ADD users, and delayed users. ADD switching and one-year persistence were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with early-ADD prescribing and its impact on clinical outcomes, including in-hospital death and hospitalization.

Results

3,116 patients were included. The ADD prescription rate was 14.31 %, with 79.82 % of those being early-ADD users. Donepezil was the most prescribed (70.18 %). The one-year persistence rate of any ADD was 24.89 %. Factors associated with early-ADD use included the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme, dyslipidemia, and dementia type. Early-ADD use was associated with reduced in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.46, 95 % CI: 0.22–0.96, p = 0.038) and hospitalization (adjusted OR = 0.70 95 % CI: 0.51–0.97, p = 0.034) after controlling for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Conclusion

ADD prescription rates were relatively low, with a one-year persistence rate of 25 %. Early-ADD use may improve clinical outcomes by reducing hospitalization and in-hospital mortality. These findings provide clinical features of ADD used in real-world settings and highlight the need for adherence to practice standards and strategies to promote ADD persistence among individuals with dementia.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期使用抗痴呆药物的模式、决定因素和结果:泰国一项为期6年的多中心队列研究
背景:抗痴呆药物(ADD)在发展中国家使用的证据有限,在这些国家获得ADD具有挑战性。我们的目的是检查与痴呆患者早期(诊断后3个月内)add使用相关的处方模式、因素和结果。方法:一项回顾性队列研究纳入了2015年至2020年期间来自泰国三家医院的年龄≥60岁的痴呆症患者。参与者被分为非add用户、早期add用户和延迟add用户。分析ADD切换和1年持续性。采用多变量logistic回归来确定与早期add处方相关的因素及其对临床结果的影响,包括院内死亡和住院。结果:共纳入3116例患者。处方率为14.31%,其中79.82%为早期患者。多奈哌齐处方最多(70.18%)。任何一种ADD的1年持续率为24.89%。与早期add使用相关的因素包括公务员医疗福利计划、血脂异常和痴呆类型。在控制年龄、性别和Charlson共病指数后,早期使用add与住院死亡率(校正比值比[aOR]=0.46, 95% CI: 0.22-0.96, p = 0.038)和住院率(校正比值比[aOR]= 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51-0.97, p = 0.034)降低相关。结论:ADD处方率较低,1年持续率为25%。早期使用多动症可以通过减少住院和住院死亡率来改善临床结果。这些发现提供了在现实环境中使用的ADD的临床特征,并强调了遵守实践标准和策略以促进痴呆患者ADD持续性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics provides a medium for the publication of papers from the fields of experimental gerontology and clinical and social geriatrics. The principal aim of the journal is to facilitate the exchange of information between specialists in these three fields of gerontological research. Experimental papers dealing with the basic mechanisms of aging at molecular, cellular, tissue or organ levels will be published. Clinical papers will be accepted if they provide sufficiently new information or are of fundamental importance for the knowledge of human aging. Purely descriptive clinical papers will be accepted only if the results permit further interpretation. Papers dealing with anti-aging pharmacological preparations in humans are welcome. Papers on the social aspects of geriatrics will be accepted if they are of general interest regarding the epidemiology of aging and the efficiency and working methods of the social organizations for the health care of the elderly.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The temporal trend in frailty prevalence from 2011 to 2020 and disparities by equity factors among middle-aged and older people in China: A population-based study Social context matters: Neighborhood environment as a moderator of the longitudinal relationship between edentulism and cognitive function among older adults in the United States Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies Risk factors for sarcopenia in community setting across the life course: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1