Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow.

Olivier Marès, Javier Ferreira, Berenice Moutinot, Vincent Martinel, Pascal Kouyoumdjian, Thomas Apard
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow.","authors":"Olivier Marès, Javier Ferreira, Berenice Moutinot, Vincent Martinel, Pascal Kouyoumdjian, Thomas Apard","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.102071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical treatment of ulnar tunnel syndrome is controversial, with no consensus on the ideal procedure. Nevertheless, in-situ decompression seems to provide faster recovery with less morbidity than neurolysis-transposition. The aim of this retrospective study was to validate a new percutaneous technique using ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective 2-center study included 40 patients with McGowan stage 1 or 2 ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow treated by a new limited ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique. Patients with McGowan stage 3, osteoarthritis at the elbow or instability were excluded. The study endpoint was clinical success of the percutaneous technique using ultrasonography for release of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. The secondary endpoint was time to recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 40 patients showed clinical improvement, with the resolution of acroparesthesia symptoms. No recurrences were observed at 13 months' follow-up. There were no cases of neurological complications, ulnar nerve instability or infection. Patients were able to return to work rapidly, with an average absence of 3.5 weeks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Numerous studies questioned the value of ulnar nerve transposition associated with release in the early stages. No significant difference was found between in-situ decompression and transposition; however, more complications were observed in patients with transposition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, this new ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique for ulnar nerve entrapment was safe. It allowed rapid recovery with effective symptom relief while limiting the risk of complications and time off work.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"102071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.102071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical treatment of ulnar tunnel syndrome is controversial, with no consensus on the ideal procedure. Nevertheless, in-situ decompression seems to provide faster recovery with less morbidity than neurolysis-transposition. The aim of this retrospective study was to validate a new percutaneous technique using ultrasonography.

Methods: A retrospective 2-center study included 40 patients with McGowan stage 1 or 2 ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow treated by a new limited ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique. Patients with McGowan stage 3, osteoarthritis at the elbow or instability were excluded. The study endpoint was clinical success of the percutaneous technique using ultrasonography for release of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow. The secondary endpoint was time to recovery.

Results: All 40 patients showed clinical improvement, with the resolution of acroparesthesia symptoms. No recurrences were observed at 13 months' follow-up. There were no cases of neurological complications, ulnar nerve instability or infection. Patients were able to return to work rapidly, with an average absence of 3.5 weeks.

Discussion: Numerous studies questioned the value of ulnar nerve transposition associated with release in the early stages. No significant difference was found between in-situ decompression and transposition; however, more complications were observed in patients with transposition.

Conclusion: Overall, this new ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique for ulnar nerve entrapment was safe. It allowed rapid recovery with effective symptom relief while limiting the risk of complications and time off work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transverse ultrasound-guided fasciotomy in lateral epicondylitis. Pyrocardan® implant interposition in the trapeziometacarpal joint: outcomes at a minimum 10 years' follow-up. TITLE: Patient Preferences for Carpal Tunnel Release Education: A Comparison of Education Materials from Popular Healthcare Websites and ChatGPT. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Concentrated autologous bone marrow injection in the surgical treatment of scaphoid non-union.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1