Yuxuan Cai , Haiyan Chen , Wenhao Zhao , Yi Sun , Meiying Wang , Ying Chen , Jin Ma
{"title":"Investigation of greenhouse gas emissions in soil remediation activities based on the integration of machine learning models and life cycle assessment","authors":"Yuxuan Cai , Haiyan Chen , Wenhao Zhao , Yi Sun , Meiying Wang , Ying Chen , Jin Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing soil contamination and achieving carbon neutrality necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from soil remediation activities. However, the ecological values of remediated soil have long been overlooked in environmental impact assessment of soil remediation. The present study integrated machine learning (ML) models and life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the secondary GHG emissions resulting from remediation activities and the tertiary GHG emissions associated with carbon sequestration capacity of remediated soil. The integrated method was applied to evaluate the life cycle GHG emissions of ex-situ thermal desorption (ESTD) and ex-situ chemical oxidation (ESCO). The offsite ESTD scenario render the highest secondary GHG emissions at 83 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> soil, while the onsite ESCO scenario resulted in the lowest secondary GHG emissions at 25 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> soil. After considering tertiary impacts, the total GHG emissions decreased by 38–40 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> soil, demonstrating the importance of considering soil carbon sequestration. Furthermore, the evaluation of tertiary impacts was conducted on national scale to compare the carbon sequestration capacity of remediated soil under different environmental conditions. ESTD remediated soil exhibited higher carbon sequestration capacity than ESCO remediated soil in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and northeast China, whereas ESCO remediated soil exhibited higher carbon sequestration capacity in southwest China. Overall, the present study provides a comprehensive evaluation of GHG emissions in soil remediation activities and new insights for decision making in low-carbon soil remediation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"487 ","pages":"Article 144630"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624040794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Addressing soil contamination and achieving carbon neutrality necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from soil remediation activities. However, the ecological values of remediated soil have long been overlooked in environmental impact assessment of soil remediation. The present study integrated machine learning (ML) models and life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the secondary GHG emissions resulting from remediation activities and the tertiary GHG emissions associated with carbon sequestration capacity of remediated soil. The integrated method was applied to evaluate the life cycle GHG emissions of ex-situ thermal desorption (ESTD) and ex-situ chemical oxidation (ESCO). The offsite ESTD scenario render the highest secondary GHG emissions at 83 kg CO2-eq/m3 soil, while the onsite ESCO scenario resulted in the lowest secondary GHG emissions at 25 kg CO2-eq/m3 soil. After considering tertiary impacts, the total GHG emissions decreased by 38–40 kg CO2-eq/m3 soil, demonstrating the importance of considering soil carbon sequestration. Furthermore, the evaluation of tertiary impacts was conducted on national scale to compare the carbon sequestration capacity of remediated soil under different environmental conditions. ESTD remediated soil exhibited higher carbon sequestration capacity than ESCO remediated soil in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and northeast China, whereas ESCO remediated soil exhibited higher carbon sequestration capacity in southwest China. Overall, the present study provides a comprehensive evaluation of GHG emissions in soil remediation activities and new insights for decision making in low-carbon soil remediation.
解决土壤污染和实现碳中和需要对土壤修复活动的温室气体(GHG)排放进行全面评估。然而,在土壤修复环境影响评价中,修复土壤的生态价值一直被忽视。本研究将机器学习(ML)模型和生命周期评估(LCA)相结合,量化修复活动产生的二次温室气体排放和修复土壤固碳能力相关的三次温室气体排放。采用综合评价方法对非原位热解吸(ESTD)和非原位化学氧化(ESCO)的全生命周期温室气体排放进行了评价。非现场ESTD情景的二次温室气体排放量最高,为83 kg CO2-eq/m3土壤,而现场ESCO情景的二次温室气体排放量最低,为25 kg CO2-eq/m3土壤。考虑第三次影响后,温室气体总排放量减少38 ~ 40 kg co2当量/m3土壤,表明考虑土壤固碳的重要性。在全国范围内进行三级影响评价,比较不同环境条件下修复土壤的固碳能力。长江中下游和东北地区ESTD修复土壤的固碳能力高于ESCO修复土壤,而西南地区ESCO修复土壤的固碳能力高于ESCO修复土壤。总体而言,本研究对土壤修复活动的温室气体排放进行了综合评价,并为土壤低碳修复决策提供了新的见解。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.