Investigation of greenhouse gas emissions in soil remediation activities based on the integration of machine learning models and life cycle assessment

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144630
Yuxuan Cai , Haiyan Chen , Wenhao Zhao , Yi Sun , Meiying Wang , Ying Chen , Jin Ma
{"title":"Investigation of greenhouse gas emissions in soil remediation activities based on the integration of machine learning models and life cycle assessment","authors":"Yuxuan Cai ,&nbsp;Haiyan Chen ,&nbsp;Wenhao Zhao ,&nbsp;Yi Sun ,&nbsp;Meiying Wang ,&nbsp;Ying Chen ,&nbsp;Jin Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing soil contamination and achieving carbon neutrality necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from soil remediation activities. However, the ecological values of remediated soil have long been overlooked in environmental impact assessment of soil remediation. The present study integrated machine learning (ML) models and life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the secondary GHG emissions resulting from remediation activities and the tertiary GHG emissions associated with carbon sequestration capacity of remediated soil. The integrated method was applied to evaluate the life cycle GHG emissions of ex-situ thermal desorption (ESTD) and ex-situ chemical oxidation (ESCO). The offsite ESTD scenario render the highest secondary GHG emissions at 83 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> soil, while the onsite ESCO scenario resulted in the lowest secondary GHG emissions at 25 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> soil. After considering tertiary impacts, the total GHG emissions decreased by 38–40 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/m<sup>3</sup> soil, demonstrating the importance of considering soil carbon sequestration. Furthermore, the evaluation of tertiary impacts was conducted on national scale to compare the carbon sequestration capacity of remediated soil under different environmental conditions. ESTD remediated soil exhibited higher carbon sequestration capacity than ESCO remediated soil in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and northeast China, whereas ESCO remediated soil exhibited higher carbon sequestration capacity in southwest China. Overall, the present study provides a comprehensive evaluation of GHG emissions in soil remediation activities and new insights for decision making in low-carbon soil remediation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"487 ","pages":"Article 144630"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624040794","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addressing soil contamination and achieving carbon neutrality necessitate a comprehensive evaluation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from soil remediation activities. However, the ecological values of remediated soil have long been overlooked in environmental impact assessment of soil remediation. The present study integrated machine learning (ML) models and life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the secondary GHG emissions resulting from remediation activities and the tertiary GHG emissions associated with carbon sequestration capacity of remediated soil. The integrated method was applied to evaluate the life cycle GHG emissions of ex-situ thermal desorption (ESTD) and ex-situ chemical oxidation (ESCO). The offsite ESTD scenario render the highest secondary GHG emissions at 83 kg CO2-eq/m3 soil, while the onsite ESCO scenario resulted in the lowest secondary GHG emissions at 25 kg CO2-eq/m3 soil. After considering tertiary impacts, the total GHG emissions decreased by 38–40 kg CO2-eq/m3 soil, demonstrating the importance of considering soil carbon sequestration. Furthermore, the evaluation of tertiary impacts was conducted on national scale to compare the carbon sequestration capacity of remediated soil under different environmental conditions. ESTD remediated soil exhibited higher carbon sequestration capacity than ESCO remediated soil in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and northeast China, whereas ESCO remediated soil exhibited higher carbon sequestration capacity in southwest China. Overall, the present study provides a comprehensive evaluation of GHG emissions in soil remediation activities and new insights for decision making in low-carbon soil remediation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习模型和生命周期评估的土壤修复活动温室气体排放研究
解决土壤污染和实现碳中和需要对土壤修复活动的温室气体(GHG)排放进行全面评估。然而,在土壤修复环境影响评价中,修复土壤的生态价值一直被忽视。本研究将机器学习(ML)模型和生命周期评估(LCA)相结合,量化修复活动产生的二次温室气体排放和修复土壤固碳能力相关的三次温室气体排放。采用综合评价方法对非原位热解吸(ESTD)和非原位化学氧化(ESCO)的全生命周期温室气体排放进行了评价。非现场ESTD情景的二次温室气体排放量最高,为83 kg CO2-eq/m3土壤,而现场ESCO情景的二次温室气体排放量最低,为25 kg CO2-eq/m3土壤。考虑第三次影响后,温室气体总排放量减少38 ~ 40 kg co2当量/m3土壤,表明考虑土壤固碳的重要性。在全国范围内进行三级影响评价,比较不同环境条件下修复土壤的固碳能力。长江中下游和东北地区ESTD修复土壤的固碳能力高于ESCO修复土壤,而西南地区ESCO修复土壤的固碳能力高于ESCO修复土壤。总体而言,本研究对土壤修复活动的温室气体排放进行了综合评价,并为土壤低碳修复决策提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Life Cycle Assessment of Large Structure Mechanical Endurance Tests - Identifying Hotspots and Reduction Potentials Investigation on targeted composite rejuvenation of aged SBS-modified bitumen for low-cost and efficient recycling Towards mineralised mycelium biocomposites: optimising fungal growth and ureolytic biomineralisation Life cycle assessment of reusable food and beverage packaging systems: A proposal of good practice Optimization Strategies for the Carbon Footprint of Aluminum-Plastic Materials Under Low-Carbon Targets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1