Optimal exercise dose-response improves health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1510578
Zhiyu Xiong, Yuan Yuan, Yong Yang, Bopeng Qiu, Ying Bai, Tao Wang, Junyu Wang, Lin Zhang, Yawen Li
{"title":"Optimal exercise dose-response improves health-related quality of life in cancer survivors: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.","authors":"Zhiyu Xiong, Yuan Yuan, Yong Yang, Bopeng Qiu, Ying Bai, Tao Wang, Junyu Wang, Lin Zhang, Yawen Li","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1510578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cancer survivors often face significant health-related quality of life (HRQoL) challenges. Although exercise has been proven to improve HRQoL in cancer survivors, the optimal dose and intensity of exercise for this population has not been fully determined. Adherence to exercise may vary based on exercise intensity, affecting results. This study explored the dose-response relationship of different exercise types and intensities to better understand their impact on HRQoL in cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched five databases-PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus-from their inception until 1 December 2023. Data analysis was performed using R software with the MBNMA and RJAGS packages. Due to combining data from different scales, effect sizes were reported as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrI). The risk of bias was assessed independently by three reviewers using the RoB2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 studies involving 3050 cancer survivors. Across all exercise types, the most beneficial exercise dose was identified to be 850 metabolic equivalents of task (METs)-min/week (SMD: 0.753, 95%Crl: 0.463 to 1.096), with diminishing returns observed beyond 1,100 METs-min/week. Among the various types of exercises, mixed training (MT) emerged as the optimal choice, demonstrating its efficacy at 970 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.883, 95% Crl: 0.455 to 1.345). Aerobic exercise (AE) at a dose of 430 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.681, 95% Crl: 0.206 to 1.099) and resistance training (RT) at 450 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.695, 95% Crl: 0.227 to 1.203) also showed significant benefits. Additionally, mind-body exercises, such as tai chi, qigong, or yoga, exhibited optimal effects at a dose of 390 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.672, 95% Crl: 0.259 to 1.087).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study sheds light on the intricate relationship between exercise interventions and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors, as elucidated through a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. The identified optimal exercise dose of 850 METs-min/week resulted in a significant improvement in health-related quality of life, underscoring the importance of regular exercise in cancer survivorship. MT emerged as the most effective modality, closely followed by RT, AE, and MBE.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=493328, identifier CRD42024493328.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"14 ","pages":"1510578"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1510578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cancer survivors often face significant health-related quality of life (HRQoL) challenges. Although exercise has been proven to improve HRQoL in cancer survivors, the optimal dose and intensity of exercise for this population has not been fully determined. Adherence to exercise may vary based on exercise intensity, affecting results. This study explored the dose-response relationship of different exercise types and intensities to better understand their impact on HRQoL in cancer survivors.

Methods: We searched five databases-PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus-from their inception until 1 December 2023. Data analysis was performed using R software with the MBNMA and RJAGS packages. Due to combining data from different scales, effect sizes were reported as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrI). The risk of bias was assessed independently by three reviewers using the RoB2 tool.

Results: A total of 48 studies involving 3050 cancer survivors. Across all exercise types, the most beneficial exercise dose was identified to be 850 metabolic equivalents of task (METs)-min/week (SMD: 0.753, 95%Crl: 0.463 to 1.096), with diminishing returns observed beyond 1,100 METs-min/week. Among the various types of exercises, mixed training (MT) emerged as the optimal choice, demonstrating its efficacy at 970 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.883, 95% Crl: 0.455 to 1.345). Aerobic exercise (AE) at a dose of 430 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.681, 95% Crl: 0.206 to 1.099) and resistance training (RT) at 450 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.695, 95% Crl: 0.227 to 1.203) also showed significant benefits. Additionally, mind-body exercises, such as tai chi, qigong, or yoga, exhibited optimal effects at a dose of 390 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.672, 95% Crl: 0.259 to 1.087).

Conclusion: Our study sheds light on the intricate relationship between exercise interventions and health-related quality of life in cancer survivors, as elucidated through a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. The identified optimal exercise dose of 850 METs-min/week resulted in a significant improvement in health-related quality of life, underscoring the importance of regular exercise in cancer survivorship. MT emerged as the most effective modality, closely followed by RT, AE, and MBE.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=493328, identifier CRD42024493328.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最佳运动剂量反应改善癌症幸存者的健康相关生活质量:随机对照试验的系统回顾和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
目的:癌症幸存者经常面临显著的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)挑战。虽然运动已被证明可以改善癌症幸存者的HRQoL,但这一人群的最佳运动剂量和强度尚未完全确定。坚持锻炼可能会因运动强度而异,从而影响结果。本研究探讨不同运动类型和强度的剂量-反应关系,以更好地了解其对癌症幸存者HRQoL的影响。方法:我们检索了pubmed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和scope等5个数据库,从它们成立到2023年12月1日。数据分析采用R软件,采用MBNMA和RJAGS软件包。由于合并了来自不同尺度的数据,效应量以95%可信区间(95% CrI)的标准化平均差异(SMD)报告。偏倚风险由三位评论者使用RoB2工具独立评估。结果:共有48项研究,涉及3050名癌症幸存者。在所有运动类型中,最有益的运动剂量被确定为850代谢当量任务(METs)-分钟/周(SMD: 0.753, 95%Crl: 0.463至1.096),超过1100 METs-分钟/周后,收益递减。在各种运动类型中,混合训练(MT)是最佳选择,其效果为970 METs-min/week (SMD: 0.883, 95% Crl: 0.455 ~ 1.345)。有氧运动(AE)的剂量为430 METs-min/周(SMD: 0.681, 95% Crl: 0.206至1.099)和阻力训练(RT)的剂量为450 METs-min/周(SMD: 0.695, 95% Crl: 0.227至1.203)也显示出显著的益处。此外,心身运动,如太极、气功或瑜伽,在390 met -min/week的剂量下表现出最佳效果(SMD: 0.672, 95% Crl: 0.259至1.087)。结论:通过系统回顾和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,我们的研究揭示了运动干预与癌症幸存者健康相关生活质量之间的复杂关系。确定的最佳运动剂量为850 met -min/周,可显著改善与健康相关的生活质量,强调了定期运动对癌症生存的重要性。MT是最有效的方式,紧随其后的是RT、AE和MBE。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=493328,标识符CRD42024493328。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
期刊最新文献
Research hotspots and trends in therapeutic drug monitoring of anticancer drugs: a 1990-2024 bibliometric analysis. Systems toxicology unravels multi-tiered carcinogenic networks of zearalenone in gastric cancer. Predictors of pathological upstaging to pT3a after nephrectomy for cT1 renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant TACHP in HER2-positive/HR-positive inflammatory breast cancer: a case report. Primary healthcare-friendly prostate cancer prediction model using routine clinical parameters: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1