Do Factors Influencing Acceptance of Kidney Stone Formers as Donors Predict Subsequent Stone Events?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70069
Mira T. Keddis, Matthew R. Howard, Nan Zhang, Jaxon K. Quillen, Matthew R. D'Costa, Hasan A. Khamash, Carrie C. Jadlowiec, Hani M. Wadei, Ivan E. Porter, Karen L. Stern, Andrew D. Rule
{"title":"Do Factors Influencing Acceptance of Kidney Stone Formers as Donors Predict Subsequent Stone Events?","authors":"Mira T. Keddis,&nbsp;Matthew R. Howard,&nbsp;Nan Zhang,&nbsp;Jaxon K. Quillen,&nbsp;Matthew R. D'Costa,&nbsp;Hasan A. Khamash,&nbsp;Carrie C. Jadlowiec,&nbsp;Hani M. Wadei,&nbsp;Ivan E. Porter,&nbsp;Karen L. Stern,&nbsp;Andrew D. Rule","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess whether kidney stone burden and risk factors at the time of kidney donor evaluation were associated with a symptomatic stone event post-donor evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified adults evaluated at Mayo Clinic (two sites) (2000–2011) for living kidney donation and had either a personal history or radiological evidence of kidney stone disease. We analyzed demographics, stone risk factors, stone number/size, and the committee's donation decision and reasons. A follow-up survey (2022–2023) assessed post-evaluation symptomatic kidney stones and related morbidity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 412 potential donors with kidney stone disease, 258 donated, 75 did not donate due to kidney stones, and 79 did not donate for other reasons. Multivariable analysis showed that candidates not donating due to stones had higher body mass index (BMI), prior symptomatic kidney stones, multiple stones on imaging, bilateral kidney stones, and diameter of largest stone ≥3 mm. Of 147 who completed the survey, 26 (18%) had a symptomatic kidney stone post-donor evaluation. Younger age (<i>p</i> = 0.031) and multiple stones on imaging (<i>p</i> = 0.02) were significant predictors of post-evaluation symptomatic stones regardless of donation status (<i>p</i> = 0.41).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Stone burden on imaging and prior symptomatic stone events were associated with not donating. Younger age and stone burden on imaging were the primary risk factors for a symptomatic kidney stone event after donor evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to assess whether kidney stone burden and risk factors at the time of kidney donor evaluation were associated with a symptomatic stone event post-donor evaluation.

Methods

We identified adults evaluated at Mayo Clinic (two sites) (2000–2011) for living kidney donation and had either a personal history or radiological evidence of kidney stone disease. We analyzed demographics, stone risk factors, stone number/size, and the committee's donation decision and reasons. A follow-up survey (2022–2023) assessed post-evaluation symptomatic kidney stones and related morbidity.

Results

Among 412 potential donors with kidney stone disease, 258 donated, 75 did not donate due to kidney stones, and 79 did not donate for other reasons. Multivariable analysis showed that candidates not donating due to stones had higher body mass index (BMI), prior symptomatic kidney stones, multiple stones on imaging, bilateral kidney stones, and diameter of largest stone ≥3 mm. Of 147 who completed the survey, 26 (18%) had a symptomatic kidney stone post-donor evaluation. Younger age (p = 0.031) and multiple stones on imaging (p = 0.02) were significant predictors of post-evaluation symptomatic stones regardless of donation status (p = 0.41).

Conclusions

Stone burden on imaging and prior symptomatic stone events were associated with not donating. Younger age and stone burden on imaging were the primary risk factors for a symptomatic kidney stone event after donor evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响肾结石患者接受供体的因素能否预测随后的结石事件?
目的:本研究旨在评估肾脏供者评估时的肾结石负担和危险因素是否与供者评估后的症状性结石事件相关。方法:我们选取了2000-2011年在梅奥诊所(Mayo Clinic)(两个站点)接受活体肾脏捐赠评估的成年人,他们有肾结石病史或影像学证据。我们分析了人口统计学、结石风险因素、结石数量/大小以及委员会的捐赠决定和原因。一项随访调查(2022-2023)评估了评估后症状性肾结石和相关发病率。结果:在412名有肾结石疾病的潜在献血者中,258人捐献,75人因肾结石未捐献,79人因其他原因未捐献。多变量分析显示,因结石而未捐献的候选人体重指数(BMI)较高,既往有肾结石症状,影像学上有多发结石,双侧肾结石,最大结石直径≥3mm。在147名完成调查的患者中,26名(18%)在供体评估后出现症状性肾结石。年龄较小(p = 0.031)和影像学上有多发结石(p = 0.02)是评估后症状性结石的显著预测因素,与捐献状态无关(p = 0.41)。结论:影像学结石负担和既往症状性结石事件与不捐献相关。供体评估后,较年轻的年龄和影像学上的结石负担是出现症状性肾结石事件的主要危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Flying Kidneys or Flying Donors: What Do Prior Canadian Living Kidney Donors Think? Individual Association of Predicted Left and Right Ventricular Mass Ratios With Survival After Heart Transplantation: A UNOS Database Analysis Liver Transplant Fast-Track With an Emphasis on Reduced Delirium: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Reducing Length of Stay Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study Is Survival Impacted by One or Several Successive Cancers After Liver Transplantation? A French National Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1